Idiots like you have argued Komen's 2 mile record wasn't strong, despite it lasting for nearly a quarter of a century. You want it both ways. Snell was the best md runner in the world for 4 years - Ryun wasn't - and achieved championship titles Ryun didn't. Ryun would likely acknowledge who was greater in the sport. And if you insist on going by times, then Hocker and co, who have run faster than Ryun's 3:33, are all better than Ryun.
You sound completely unhinged. Can't you go for one day, just one day without insulting people? Disagree with them, refute their arguments, whatever, but without insulting them?
So are those who direct insults at me in their posts also unhinged?
Two athletes from only one small nationality have both shown they were better than Ingebrigtsen in a championship final. If they could whip his *ss there is little doubt a legend like Snell would if competing and training in the same era. Oh, I forgot - and doping like Ingebrigtsen does.
I saw this "logic" from other dumbers as well, Dumbstrong, so you are in good company.
Scots are better than Ingebrigtsen (they aren't), so is the rest of the world. Dumbstrong in his element.
In a extremely slow race, Snell would beat Ingebrigtsen most likely. Faster than 3:32: no chance.
Scots are better than Ingebrigtsen in a world championship 1500 final. Two golds to his silver medals says so.
If Snell competed in the modern era he would have all its advantages. He would also be doped like Jakob is. So Snell wins.
For sure, 4:43.13 and 7:53.10 are hardly worth mentioning, I agree.
I have not seen this asterisk next to his name yet. Any link?
Those time are meaningless. They were run springs, on an extra bouncy track, with wave lights. Nobody knows what they mean.
You want to give him credit for the artificial advantages provided by Nike etal.
For you the shoes give an enormous advantage. Your friend, the other dumber, says again and again that the benefit of the shoes is extremely little (for the only reason, that he still WANTS to explain all the good times which were run recently solely by doping).
Only one of you two dumbers can be right. Or none.
So, a time better than Komen's 7:20.67 is meaningless. Dumbstrong is not alone.
Those time are meaningless. They were run springs, on an extra bouncy track, with wave lights. Nobody knows what they mean.
You want to give him credit for the artificial advantages provided by Nike etal.
For you the shoes give an enormous advantage. Your friend, the other dumber, says again and again that the benefit of the shoes is extremely little (for the only reason, that he still WANTS to explain all the good times which were run recently solely by doping).
Only one of you two dumbers can be right. Or none.
So, a time better than Komen's 7:20.67 is meaningless. Dumbstrong is not alone.
I never said it's only the shoes. Doping + shoes is what I said. It's cheating on top of cheating.
Komen's doped up time is pretty meaningless as well.
I saw this "logic" from other dumbers as well, Dumbstrong, so you are in good company.
Scots are better than Ingebrigtsen (they aren't), so is the rest of the world. Dumbstrong in his element.
In a extremely slow race, Snell would beat Ingebrigtsen most likely. Faster than 3:32: no chance.
Scots are better than Ingebrigtsen in a world championship 1500 final. Two golds to his silver medals says so.
If Snell competed in the modern era he would have all its advantages. He would also be doped like Jakob is. So Snell wins.
Ingebrigtsen is better than Wightman. Ingebrigtsen is better than Kerr.
That's true while looking on all competitions at 1500m.
It's also true when looking on Championship competitions.
It's also true when just looking on World championships competitions.
So, what exactly is your point, Dumbstrong?
Snell would win against Ingebrigtsen today regularly, that's what you're saying. For exactly 1 reason: you are from his country and almost his age. Those are the only reasons why you try to argue strongly against all rationality.
Snell probably would be a strong medal contender in the 800m but not in the 1500m. He wouldn't even try the longer event and concentrate on his strength.
For you the shoes give an enormous advantage. Your friend, the other dumber, says again and again that the benefit of the shoes is extremely little (for the only reason, that he still WANTS to explain all the good times which were run recently solely by doping).
Only one of you two dumbers can be right. Or none.
So, a time better than Komen's 7:20.67 is meaningless. Dumbstrong is not alone.
I never said it's only the shoes. Doping + shoes is what I said. It's cheating on top of cheating.
Komen's doped up time is pretty meaningless as well.
For sure. Ingebrigtsen is on Henry Rono level and the rest on Ron Clarke level. Coe today would ran sub 1:40 and Ryun 3:24.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.