Lol a "the authoritarian socialists were actually conservatives" in the wild.
The national socialists were indeed socialists. This is clear from their policies: putting price caps on goods and services, drastically increasing the minimum wage, nationalizing industry, preventing mobility between careers, manipulating the money supply, and institutionalizing red tape and bureaucracy. All perfect examples of "Hardcore conservative principals"
0/10
Do you believe that putting price caps on goods is more of a conservative position or a liberal one?
Do you believe that putting radically increased price floors on labor is more of a conservative position or a liberal one?
How about nationalization of industry and squashing entrepreneurship with red tape, is that more of a conservative position or a liberal one?
the better answeer is that American kids don't give a flying carp about their standardized test score so they don't try very hard. Pay them $1 per correct answer and they catch up to otehr nations right quick.
Other nations' kids dont' respond to the same stimulus.
You’re too stupid to understand how standardized testing works.
The researchers administered a 25-question math test at schools in Shanghai and the US comprised of previous PISA questions. Students were randomly divided into two groups: in the first, students received $25 at the start of the test, losing a dollar for every question they got wrong. The other group was not paid. The scores of Shanghai students didn’t shift much in response to financial incentives. But the American students who were paid answered at least one more question correctly, on average. The average honor student did even better, boosting her score by two points. As a result, the researchers think a $25 incentive scheme could meaningfully change the US’s PISA rankings. They predict that if the US had used financial incentives during the 2012 PISA test, the country’s math ranking would have risen to 19th, from 36th. (The effects, though, would be smaller if all countries paid their students.)
He didnt cost them that much. Contrary to popular belief he was not the main character in the Dominion crapola.
Fox News didn't hand over $787 million for "crapola." And yes Carlson was a main witness regarding Dominion's claims of false reporting, as evidence by the fact that he got fired over it.
Go ahead and try another spin.
seeing reports that tucker was fired as much for his criticism of fox management as anything else. So dominion dollars might have been just a part of it unfortunately.
in any case, murdoch has to be furious that he told the news people that the 'stolen election' story was false but the news people ran with it anyway. Murdoch has been proven right and now can't trust the news people much and has to pay a billion dollars. I could see murdoch in a fury trying to reestablish control over the news division by firing a rebellious carlson.
“The effects, though, would be smaller if all countries paid their students.”
This explains why standardized testing within the USA is already rigged. More students with a higher score, lower proficiency rate. You proved the original point of being too stupid.
The decision to fire Tucker Carlson came straight from Fox Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch, according to people familiar with the situation who were not authorized to comment. https://t.co/RsBWFVjYSS
It seems like the motivation for Tucker's terminiation was not the Dominion case, but an ongoing harassment/discrimination suit against Fox by a former female producer. He's really following the footsteps of his predecessor, Bill O'Rapey.
Nazi Germany was a right-wing (fake socialist) dictatorship. Hardcore conservative principals, racism, white supremacy, 95% Christian. They demanded a a single-minded, obedient "national community". Sound familiar in 2023?
Lol a "the authoritarian socialists were actually conservatives" in the wild.
The national socialists were indeed socialists. This is clear from their policies: putting price caps on goods and services, drastically increasing the minimum wage, nationalizing industry, preventing mobility between careers, manipulating the money supply, and institutionalizing red tape and bureaucracy. All perfect examples of "Hardcore conservative principals"
Hitler was actually asked about this in 1923
‘Why’, I asked Hitler, ‘do you call yourself a National Socialist, since your party program is the very anthesis of that commonly accredited to Socialism?’
‘Socialism’, he retorted, putting down his cup of tea, ‘is the science of dealing with the common weal [health or well-being]. Communism is not Socialism. Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take Socialism away from the Socialists. ‘Socialism is an ancient Aryan, Germanic institution. Our German ancestors held certain lands in common. They cultivated the idea of the common weal. Marxism has no right to disguise itself as socialism. Socialism, unlike Marxism, does not repudiate private property. Unlike Marxism, it involves no negation of personality and, unlike Marxism, it is patriotic.
So there you have it, he was a 'patriotic' anti-Marxist, pro-private property nationalist who's politics was viewed as the antihesis of socialism by the public and journalists at the time.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
