say it again. wrote:
original liar soorer wrote:
Cognitive distortions !
Perhaps she won’t admit because she did not cheat.
Haha,someone is very close to Shelby or needs a court order as they are obsessed with her.
She cheated and is banned so you both need to move on.
Rules…. Read them.
westsouthrunner wrote:
original liar soorer wrote:
Cognitive distortions !
Perhaps she won’t admit because she did not cheat.
What I don't get is how the lab director was able to testify in court again. She should be fined/jailed for her handling of the Lawson case. That's just a huge red flag to me. Regardless I'm happy she is still doing workouts and grinding until the ban is over.
It has been argued that CAS is not as disassociated from WADA as you would expect to see in the real world.
original liar soorer wrote:
say it again. wrote:
Haha,someone is very close to Shelby or needs a court order as they are obsessed with her.
She cheated and is banned so you both need to move on.
Rules…. Read them.
Weird stalker alert.
The Young and The Clueless wrote:
kratom l wrote:
Yeah, people love to act like running is a time suck.
It's hilarious. I'm not sure there's any other sport where the best train for less time a day than runners?
Look at the Pro Tour cycling guys on Strava. Read about the time spent in a pool for olympic swimmers.
Running 45 to 120min a day is doable for almost any schedule if someone wants it bad enough.
Spoken like a true hobby jogger that has never really trained like a pro. Check out some of the pros on IG. In addition to their running, most true world class competitors are also lifting, doing prehab and rehab work, meeting with nutritionists, psychologists, and other performance consultants, working with product developers and sports research experts, posting on social, doing interviews and podcasts, traveling to support the sponsors, etc. I have known a few BTC athletes and they are engaged in running and related activities for at least 8-10 hours a day. Granted, it is not 40+ hours of labor or office drudgery but it's not as if they run for about an hour each day and then have 23 hours of unadulterated free time.
When German Fernandez was a pro, I read an article about him where he said he spent hours playing video games. If what you said about pro athletes is true, it’s not helping them run any faster. Hocker has run well without devoting 60 hours a week to running. Posters have pointed out that someone can sign a pro contract and still attend college but according to you, that would be impossible.
What is a “performance consult” Do you mean the coach? Most of the stuff you listed wouldn’t be on a daily basis and/or would take minutes instead of hours.
2 THE GILLS!!!
say it again. wrote:
original liar soorer wrote:
Rules…. Read them.
Weird stalker alert.
Well; have you read them?
original liar soorer wrote:
say it again. wrote:
Weird stalker alert.
Well; have you read them?
I know she's a convicted cheat and banned from the sport so good riddance.
Weird person.
say it again. wrote:
original liar soorer wrote:
Well; have you read them?
I know she's a convicted cheat and banned from the sport so good riddance.
Weird person.
The conviction is not for intent/ cheating..
Do read the rules.
original liar soorer wrote:
say it again. wrote:
I know she's a convicted cheat and banned from the sport so good riddance.
Weird person.
The conviction is not for intent/ cheating..
Do read the rules.
She wasn’t even convicted.
Exactly
SDSU Aztec wrote:
original liar soorer wrote:
The conviction is not for intent/ cheating..
Do read the rules.
She wasn’t even convicted.
You forgot to add ….. for cheating.
original liar soorer wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
She wasn’t even convicted.
You forgot to add ….. for cheating.
Pack it in buddy. She cheated and got banned. It’s over
original liar soorer wrote:
say it again. wrote:
I know she's a convicted cheat and banned from the sport so good riddance.
Weird person.
The conviction is not for intent/ cheating..
Do read the rules.
Go away Shelby stalker,she's banned 👍
say it again. wrote:
original liar soorer wrote:
The conviction is not for intent/ cheating..
Do read the rules.
Go away Shelby stalker,she's banned 👍
But not for cheating.👍
Have you read the rules?
say it again. wrote:
original liar soorer wrote:
The conviction is not for intent/ cheating..
Do read the rules.
Go away Shelby stalker,she's banned 👍
Correctly banned, but not for cheating.
Payton.ramynke@gmail.comwrote:
Check her insta story.
No thanks - I would sooner soil my pants than look at anything this convicted drug cheat says or does. Based on her "testimony" nothing she says can be believed other than by the brain dead hard-of-thinking.
Nothing to see here... wrote:
Payton.ramynke@gmail.comwrote:
Check her insta story.
No thanks - I would sooner soil my pants than look at anything this convicted drug cheat says or does. Based on her "testimony" nothing she says can be believed other than by the brain dead hard-of-thinking.
Well; yet another that has not studied the rules nor the decision.
Go but some diapers.
original liar soorer wrote:
say it again. wrote:
Go away Shelby stalker,she's banned 👍
Correctly banned, but not for cheating.
I know Shelby threads always devolve into this same argument, but can you explain how she wasn't cheating. She produced a positive test for a banned drug. How is this not cheating?
mr65 wrote:I know Shelby threads always devolve into this same argument, but can you explain how she wasn't cheating. She produced a positive test for a banned drug. How is this not cheating?
LOL, yes, she was banned for intentional doping after testing positive.
Some people here (mostly the same two over and over again) always make a big deal that intent was presumed/deemed after her excuse was laughed out of town, not "proven", according to the Wada's wording.
Of course logic suggests that if you have no excuse for testing positive, that you doped on purpose.
But, trolls will be trolling, and doper apologists will be obfuscating.
2 THE GILLS!!!