... and had little Revolutionary War *debt*. ...
... and had little Revolutionary War *debt*. ...
Flagpole wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Correct. And if we teach falsehoods like "slavery was a necessary evil" then we will never learn anything from history. Our students will only learn a Soviet style of history where the United States is eternally virtuous and can never do anything wrong.
Our treatment of native Americans was a necessary evil
Japanese interment camps were a necessary evil.
The Tuskegee syphilis experiments were a necessary evil.
Segregation was a necessary evil.
Child separations at the border are a necessary evil.
Fat Hurts is 100% right going back several pages on this topic. All posters who have questioned him or given Tom Cotton even a little bit of leeway here are wrong.
Word
Trump's double standards...
Flagpole wrote:
unbiasedohiovoter2020 wrote:
Jim Ryun is a true hero. Lifelong losers and Christian haters (Agip, fat hurts, flagpole, et al) are jealous disgusting pieces of trash. Be sure of this, losers, you will give an account for your support of democrat evils.
You are calling Fat Hurts a "Christian hater"? Dude, he's an Evangelical Christian! What are you talking about? As for me, while I am agnostic these days, I definitely don't hate Christians. I dislike hypocrisy and I do see that in many Christians, but I see that in atheists too.
Democrats are definitely not evil. Donald Trump is evil. People who support him are one of two things:
1) JUST stupid.
2) Racist.
There are no other possibilities.
“It’s like saying to somebody, ‘You have a bowl of sh!t in front of you, and all you’ve got to do is eat half of it instead of the whole thing.’ It’s still sh!t.”- Nina Turner commenting on Biden (Crazy Bernie's campaign co-chair)
Dementia Joe supporters are eating sh!t and saying it tastes great.
Election Stolen by Trump wrote:
The Minneapolis riots TERRORIST, who used a loaded umbrella to smashed windows, and who set fires, has been identified. AND he is ....
... Biff tRigged is going to have a meltdown ...
Since when has he cared about facts? He will just move on and find another bogeyman.
Wondering if impeachment of Barr makes sense right now...
Very likely that Barr's daughter is facilitating trump and Barr's corruption. Remember when I said Barr stands to make much more money than he'd ever sniffed before?
unbiasedohiovoter2020 wrote:
Jim Ryun is a true hero. Lifelong losers and Christian haters (Agip, fat hurts, flagpole, et al) are jealous disgusting pieces of trash. Be sure of this, losers, you will give an account for your support of democrat evils.
A true hero?
https://web.archive.org/web/20061103012733/http://cjonline.com/stories/102306/loc_ryunboyda1.shtmlTrollminator wrote:
Trump's double standards...
https://twitter.com/RVAwonk/status/1288203761257775106?s=20
Powerful stuff.
unbiasedohiovoter2020 wrote:
Jim Ryun is a true hero. Lifelong losers and Christian haters (Agip, fat hurts, flagpole, et al) are jealous disgusting pieces of trash. Be sure of this, losers, you will give an account for your support of democrat evils.
These are accurate statements. The democrat lovers listed above have continuously posted false and offensive (profanity laced) statements. They have rejected Christian truths and embraced democrat evils.
Fat hurts wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Trump's double standards...
https://twitter.com/RVAwonk/status/1288203761257775106?s=20Powerful stuff.
Incorrect. Just another Christian hating democrat spewing lies and nonsense. Democrats have rejected Christian truths and embraced evils.
Fat hurts wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Trump's double standards...
https://twitter.com/RVAwonk/status/1288203761257775106?s=20Powerful stuff.
It was one thing to have unhinged trump from the beginning, but with the help of the AG and others trump becomes a threat to our democracy and future.
Barr signaled today that something big is coming. This is similar to Rudy's announcement on HRC's emails. Barr is unfortunately a smart and experienced person, he can really give trump a shot at staying in the WH. My guess is he makes an outrageous announcement close to election and even throws some political enemies in jail to give his claim maximum potency. Just remember this - once they get the results to be close enough, they can throw the whole thing in limbo and find a way to keep trump in the office. We would be crazy to think the SC is going to get involved - they'd kick right back to congress. Trump and co will do whatever it takes.
Trollminator wrote:
Trump's double standards...
https://twitter.com/RVAwonk/status/1288203761257775106?s=20
So speaks the woman who had no problem with CHOP/CHAZ in Seattle. She needs to be put into a rubber room.
Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
unbiasedohiovoter2020 wrote:
Jim Ryun is a true hero. Lifelong losers and Christian haters (Agip, fat hurts, flagpole, et al) are jealous disgusting pieces of trash. Be sure of this, losers, you will give an account for your support of democrat evils.
A true hero?
https://web.archive.org/web/20061103012733/http://cjonline.com/stories/102306/loc_ryunboyda1.shtml
That was not good. Ryun deflected about knowing Mark Foley (sexting underage girls), and then he backed up Dennis Hastert (a pedophile) to investigate Foley. "Ryun backed up Hastert for calling for an investigation [into Foley] by the Justice Department." Those events in 2006 lead to Ryun's defeat in the 2007 Republican primary when he attempted to keep his seat.
Trollminator wrote:
Wondering if impeachment of Barr makes sense right now...
https://www.citizensforethics.org/press-release/crew-releases-attorney-general-barr-impeachment-report/
It only makes sense to all the delusional leftards. Let me remind you that Congress has a 25% approval rating.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/207579/public-approval-rating-of-the-us-congress/Annah Historian wrote:
agip wrote:
So your view is that the US could have been a 13-colony nation if slavery had been outlawed in the 1787 Constitution? Because no historian would agree with you.
Slavery was the trade-off for having a 13 colony new nation. That's what Cotton was saying and that is correct.
You are incorrect. The northern states were in debt because they mostly financed the Revolutionary War -- the southern states were not much involved and had little Revolutionary War free. The southern states bought into the new nation -- there was no requirement that they join at all -- by assuming some of the revolutionary war debt (by becoming part of the new nation), and insisting that the new capital be located in the south. So, the kicker was assuming debt in exchange for a southern capital.
please give us your interpretation and rationale for the 3/5 compromise.
agip wrote:
Annah Historian wrote:
You are incorrect. The northern states were in debt because they mostly financed the Revolutionary War -- the southern states were not much involved and had little Revolutionary War free. The southern states bought into the new nation -- there was no requirement that they join at all -- by assuming some of the revolutionary war debt (by becoming part of the new nation), and insisting that the new capital be located in the south. So, the kicker was assuming debt in exchange for a southern capital.
please give us your interpretation and rationale for the 3/5 compromise.
Here, to get you started:
The founders’ efforts to create a more perfect union foundered here, on this fundamental issue of whether fellow humans could be the property that government existed to protect. It’s not that many founders didn’t oppose slavery in theory. Gouverneur Morris declared it “a nefarious institution” and “the curse of heaven,” while Maryland’s Luther Martin deemed the importation of slaves “inconsistent with the principles of the revolution and dishonorable to the American character.” Martin held slaves at the time, as did others, like George Mason and James Madison, who also disavowed aspects of slavery at the convention.
Their commitment to union, though, overmastered their commitment to liberty. Southerners whined and threatened; northerners temporized and accommodated. William R. Davie of North Carolina declared that “the business was at an end,” for his state “would never confederate” without slave representation.[/b/ Finally, they agreed that each enslaved human would count toward three-fifths of a full person for purposes of representation only. Gouverneur Morris capitulated, conceding that “it is in vain for the Eastern States to insist on what the Southn. States will never agree to”; he had come “to form a compact for the good of America.”
Hugh Williamson of North Carolina captured the mood, declaring “that both in opinion and practice, he was against slavery; but thought it more in favor of humanity . . . to let in South Carolina, and Georgia, on those terms than to exclude them from the Union.”
Southern delegates had successfully ransomed the union in exchange for constitutional protections of slavery.
agip wrote:
Annah Historian wrote:
You are incorrect. The northern states were in debt because they mostly financed the Revolutionary War -- the southern states were not much involved and had little Revolutionary War free. The southern states bought into the new nation -- there was no requirement that they join at all -- by assuming some of the revolutionary war debt (by becoming part of the new nation), and insisting that the new capital be located in the south. So, the kicker was assuming debt in exchange for a southern capital.
please give us your interpretation and rationale for the 3/5 compromise.
Properly called the Three-Fifths Compromise, not the 3/5 compromise. Answer: It is an amendment passed in 1787. It has nothing to do with establishing the United States in 1776.