johnny99 wrote:
The majority of America voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016.
Nah, it was just a plurality. She didn't quite get 50%+ of the votes cast.
johnny99 wrote:
The majority of America voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016.
Nah, it was just a plurality. She didn't quite get 50%+ of the votes cast.
formerly present wrote:
johnny99 wrote:
The majority of America voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016.
Nah, it was just a plurality. She didn't quite get 50%+ of the votes cast.
True. I took a little license there.
Stop embarrassing yourself and promoting your naivety Biff.
Biden categorically does NOT support defunding the police, he has been crystal clear.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Dementia Joe has joined the far left mob. He supports defunding the police.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/biden-says-police-become-enemy-calls-cutting-police-funding-video/#Trumplandslide
"Four more years!"
KAG2020
Biden makes a lot of sense, and is light years ahead of Trump in terms of being able to answer questions. Trump doesn't have the intellect or the nerve to do an interview like this one.
https://twitter.com/AdyBarkan/status/1280883173719752704?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweetagip wrote:
today we learned in various news sources:
1) The DNC and the Biden campaign are working harmoniously together and little friction is happening. This is not usually the case - usually a campaign is always fighting the DNC.
2) Rasmussen, a pro-trump outlier of a pollster, has Biden +10
3) Nearly 100% of Warren and Bernie voters in the swing states have every plan to vote for Joe. Absolutely no dissension in the Dem ranks. (that will not last but it's fun now)
So far so good.
Yep. #1 is likely to get Norpoth (The Primary Model) to either say Biden is going to win or that it will be much closer than he has said so far.
That Rasmussen and Fox News polls have Biden winning overall and in key states is really bad for Trump.
Trollminator wrote:
semsurrrrrrrrrr wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ign_vZupjnoHa - well done
Excellent.
TTH wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Trump is laughable. He can't string a coherent sentence together even when fumbling through a teleprompter, let alone think on his feet w/o constantly looking down at his notes.
You're right Rigged.
Nonsense. Trump can riff for an hour straight, easy and make absolute sense. Only the haters with careful editing get something they can obsess about. One on one in a debate, Biden will be toast. Hardcore dems will still vote for him but the precious middle ground will not be compelled to show up to vote for him. There will be Dems who are disillusioned the race is between two old white guys, again. Some undecideds will not bother or vote Trump. Trump fans will cite the continued lies about Trump and come out in record numbers. Name recognition is huge and Trump has it along with 3 years of very strong economic numbers before the virus hit.
semsurrrrrrrrr wrote:
Stop embarrassing yourself and promoting your naivety Biff.
Biden categorically does NOT support defunding the police, he has been crystal clear.
No, you need to face reality. Dementia Joe has contradicted what he said in the past. He either changed his mind or completely forgot what he said earlier this year. Your choice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HzifzNAEDoPresidentTrump wrote:
TTH wrote:
You're right Rigged.
Nonsense. Trump can riff for an hour straight, easy and make absolute sense. Only the haters with careful editing get something they can obsess about. One on one in a debate, Biden will be toast. Hardcore dems will still vote for him but the precious middle ground will not be compelled to show up to vote for him. There will be Dems who are disillusioned the race is between two old white guys, again. Some undecideds will not bother or vote Trump. Trump fans will cite the continued lies about Trump and come out in record numbers. Name recognition is huge and Trump has it along with 3 years of very strong economic numbers before the virus hit.
This is wishful thinking of the highest order.
There are at least two well funded Republican groups who are openly, actively and effectively campaigning against Trump and in favor of Biden. You should check out their videos, they're very well done. Point me to the Democratic groups that are campaigning against Biden and in favor of Trump.
And unless Hannity is the one asking the questions, Trump's not going to do well in a debate.
Flagpole wrote:
agip wrote:
today we learned in various news sources:
1) The DNC and the Biden campaign are working harmoniously together and little friction is happening. This is not usually the case - usually a campaign is always fighting the DNC.
2) Rasmussen, a pro-trump outlier of a pollster, has Biden +10
3) Nearly 100% of Warren and Bernie voters in the swing states have every plan to vote for Joe. Absolutely no dissension in the Dem ranks. (that will not last but it's fun now)
So far so good.
Yep. #1 is likely to get Norpoth (The Primary Model) to either say Biden is going to win or that it will be much closer than he has said so far.
That Rasmussen and Fox News polls have Biden winning overall and in key states is really bad for Trump.
Sure. What ever you say, Mister Zero Percent Chance & I know about more about presidential elections than anybody.
Enjoy your loss, ?pole.
Fat hurts wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
You have most certainly called yourself an Evangelical or belonging to an Evangelical Church MANY TIMES in this thread including in this current discussion of ours where you have proven not to know much about Evangelical Churches. Convenient that you now say you rarely use that term. You said they (Evangelical churches) all operate independently. That is patently false, and in fact there are many that do not. You are wrong on this point. I am right and have been proven so. There really is nothing more for you to say on this matter. Take this as something you have learned today and move on. Absolutely BS on your part to say I haven't got a clue. YOU are the one who had to learn something here. I already knew everything and taught you something today.
I can tell you that neither I nor anyone I know identifies themselves as an "evangelical" unless the name comes up, which it basically never does except in rare cases like this discussion. But you didn't know that because you know almost nothing about evangelicals.
Evangelical churches do all operate independently. The rare exceptions aren't even worth considering. Your insistence that "we" should "break off" and "find a new name" also shows you know almost nothing. There is no "we", because "we" are all independent from each other.
Stay in your lane Flaggy. You don't know what you are talking about.
Dude, this is my lane. I am not sure how old you are, but I was a practicing Christian until I was almost 40. I grew up in the church with a pastor for a father and as such went to every possible service, youth group, outing, etc. as a kid and then taught Sunday school with my wife for years until we had had enough of the crap that began to seep into our church. I had to deal with people coming into our church who identified as Evangelicals. You are not right about this. There is nothing you have told me that I do not already know. My YOU was to YOU and your own church. Don't make me think you aren't as smart as I have thought. ANYONE who isn't happy with the label of an Evangelical, whether loosely apply or not should do something about it. Since YOUR church is independent, how about "FormerlEvangicals".
And again, NO, not all Evangelical churches are independent. I don't want to do the work for you, but there are TONS of them in the US that have EVANGELICAL in their name (many also that do not), and they have structured conferences, boards, hierarchy, etc. My own Methodist Church (of which I am still a member) has an Evangelical split off called the Evangelical Methodist Church of America. They run a college, have a conference, etc. Go do the research for yourself and learn something. You are not right about this. It isn't just a few rare exceptions. Again, initially you said NONE of them had any hierarchy. Now you are trying to backtrack. You are wrong. Accept defeat. Just because you are a devout Evangelical Christian does not mean you know everything about Evangelical Christians and their churches, because you do not. You do not know what you think you know.
You can be in this lane, but you need to learn some more first.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
The New York Times is already making up excuses for Dementia Joe to duck the debates.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EcZ4e8IXkAA_BXo?format=jpg&name=900x900Dementia Joe is senile. They know he's senile. That's what all this is about.
Elder abuse.
Yes Biff, you've got this figured out. Who knew you were also a stable genius?
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
TTH wrote:
You're right Rigged.
Dr Ronny Jackson- Former White House physician for Obama and Trump administrations, gave the Montreal Cognitive Assessment to Trump in 2018 at the President’s request, so Trump could quell criticisms from his foes that he was mental unfit.
“If (Trump) goes head-to-head with Joe Biden cognitively, there just wouldn’t be much of a comparison. It would be very one-sided,” Jackson said.
He suspected that’s why Biden hasn’t been in public much lately and said he thought the Biden campaign will try to get out of the three debates they have agreed to.
“They cannot afford to put Joe Biden on the stage side-by-side with President Trump. It will be an unmitigated disaster for their party,” Jackson said.
The doctor believes Biden should take the MoCA, detailed here, because “the standard has been set and it’s been pushed by the far-left and the liberal press.”
He pointed to a group of psychiatrists who called on Trump to be examined by a “panel” of them.
Jackson said they asserted “from now on, anybody who’s considered for President of the United States should be submitted to a screening exam” by a number of psychiatrists as a way to get Trump.
“Now that they’ve got Joe Biden as their candidate, nobody is saying that. It’s crickets,” he said.
Jackson asserted Biden is “flawed on many fronts with regards to his cognitive prowess,” and Jackson is “disgusted with the double standard.”
He added those who have called on Trump to be examined should have “some urgency” in demanding the same thing for Biden.
Jackson said many people have suspicions “something’s wrong and he wouldn’t do well” on the test and that he’s “not cognitively sharp enough to be our President right now.”
He added that Biden’s campaign is “not going to let” him take it.
“They will do everything in their power to prevent that from happening. They will not let him be examined because it’s not going to be good for him,” Jackson said.
“I want my President, my Commander-in-Chief, my head of state to be a little bit sharper mentally than Joe Biden currently is,” Jackson said.
“Maybe he would have been fine ten years ago, but I legitimately think Joe Biden’s window … has closed,”
“It doesn’t take a neurosurgeon, it doesn’t take a psychiatrist to realize that Joe Biden does not possess the mental acuity right now to lead this country,” he told The Kyle Olson Show.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=19elWWUmIj8&feature=emb_logohttps://thefederalist.com/2020/07/03/biden-campaign-refuses-to-release-cognitive-test-results/
^ post unread because regarding debates, only one of the two has so far publicly mentioned they may not debate and has bellyached that it will be rigged. But sure, you're the stable genius here, so I defer to you.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EcbX4qyU8AAckjD?format=jpg&name=small"Come on, man!"
You keep proving to us with every post that trump is toast... the dementia hoax is all you can come up with. No more mention of the polls and betting odds - amazing how that works.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
semsurrrrrrrrr wrote:
Stop embarrassing yourself and promoting your naivety Biff.
Biden categorically does NOT support defunding the police, he has been crystal clear.
No, you need to face reality. Dementia Joe has contradicted what he said in the past. He either changed his mind or completely forgot what he said earlier this year. Your choice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HzifzNAEDo
You're not serious, are you?
Here's the entire interview. From about 22:00-23:00, he discusses police reform. He mentions that police don't need surplus military equipment and that when they come into a neighborhood in a military Humvee, they become the enemy, whereas they're supposed to protect us.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4CLoiA3vfQsemsurrrrrrrrr wrote:
Stop embarrassing yourself and promoting your naivety Biff.
This will only be possible if and once he's no longer a tzee... so never
Trollminator wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
The New York Times is already making up excuses for Dementia Joe to duck the debates.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EcZ4e8IXkAA_BXo?format=jpg&name=900x900Dementia Joe is senile. They know he's senile. That's what all this is about.
Elder abuse.
Yes Biff, you've got this figured out. Who knew you were also a stable genius?
Dementia Joe's campaign staff doesn't want to put him on the stage. They will do anything to keep him hiding in the basement. It's time for you to accept the fact that your candidate's brain is fried.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eca13-WXQAE1KW5?format=jpg&name=small"Come on, man!"
johnny99 wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
No, you need to face reality. Dementia Joe has contradicted what he said in the past. He either changed his mind or completely forgot what he said earlier this year. Your choice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HzifzNAEDoYou're not serious, are you?
Here's the entire interview. From about 22:00-23:00, he discusses police reform. He mentions that police don't need surplus military equipment and that when they come into a neighborhood in a military Humvee, they become the enemy, whereas they're supposed to protect us.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4CLoiA3vfQ
Trigged is a clown, con artists take advantage of this simpleton.
He’ll die an idiot that grifters like the Trumps & Kushners rode.