Official LRC Kamala Harris for President Thread

Non-Running Politics

Reply New New Thread

Moderation Moderation Information Moderation Information & Rules

Page 484 of 1,459

1 483 484 485 1,459

Next Last

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:27pm EDT

re: Trollminator

maybe Trump shouldn't have tried to get Pence killed. Just spitballing here.

More than 200 Republicans who previously worked for either former President George W. Bush, the late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., or Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president in an open letter Monday obtained exclusively by USA TODAY.
From the letter: "Of course, we have plenty of honest, ideological disagreements with Vice President Harris and Gov. Walz. That’s to be expected. The alternative, however, is simply untenable."

This post was edited 22 seconds after it was posted.

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:29pm EDT

re: Trollminator

Trollminator wrote:
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
"Checked in with sources in MI WI and PA today and all of them said the race is essentially tied — within the margin of error."- Jake Tapper
Bad news for Cackles.
It must suck to watch your master's lead disappear like this and have to anxiously hang on to every single new poll result in fear. Harris has all the momentum and trump can't shake off his stink. He's not winning any new votes and Kamala's stock keeps rising. Sucks to be you.

Well I'm not an idiot so I was expecting a bump from sh*t canning Biden and having a convention.

The fact that her lead is small nationally and non-existent in the swing states would worry a more clever person.

Not you though! You're running with your head firmly stuffed up your culty @ss.

LOL!

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:29pm EDT

re: agip

agip wrote:
maybe Trump shouldn't have tried to get Pence killed. Just spitballing here.
More than 200 Republicans who previously worked for either former President George W. Bush, the late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., or Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president in an open letter Monday obtained exclusively by USA TODAY.
From the letter: "Of course, we have plenty of honest, ideological disagreements with Vice President Harris and Gov. Walz. That’s to be expected. The alternative, however, is simply untenable."

BUT TRUMP'S GOT RFK, JR, AND HIS FAMILY IS FILLED WITH DEMOCRATS!!!

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:30pm EDT

re: agip

agip wrote:
maybe Trump shouldn't have tried to get Pence killed. Just spitballing here.
More than 200 Republicans who previously worked for either former President George W. Bush, the late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., or Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president in an open letter Monday obtained exclusively by USA TODAY.
From the letter: "Of course, we have plenty of honest, ideological disagreements with Vice President Harris and Gov. Walz. That’s to be expected. The alternative, however, is simply untenable."

Almost September 2024 and you cultist imbeciles still haven't figured out that the neocons are all in your party now...

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:31pm EDT

re: WORLDS APART

WORLDS APART wrote:
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
"Checked in with sources in MI WI and PA today and all of them said the race is essentially tied — within the margin of error."- Jake Tapper
Bad news for Cackles.
538 polling average has Harris up by 2.9 in MI. A month ago, Trump was up by 0.9.
In Wisconsin, Harris is up by 3.6 points. On August 1, she was up 1.2.
In PA, Harris is up by 1.5 points. On July 30, she was up by 0.5.
Yes, it's close, and you could probably say that it's a toss up in those 3 states. But in all 3 states, Harris has made up ground over the last month or so and has a lead in all 3 states. She is trending in the right direction, while Trump is sinking. Unless the orange man can turn it around, Harris is going to continue to attract the undecided voters, and by November she'll be ahead by much more.
Bottom line, anyone would rather be in Harris' position than Trump's at this time.

yeah the only problem is that Trump always does 3-4 points better than the polls.

which means he'd probably win if the election were today.

Although I did read an interesting bit from one polling company, trying to adjust for distrustful alienated m'agas:

In the past, if m'agas just started screaming at the pollster, it was marked as a 'no answer.'

now, if a m'aga starts screaming at the pollster and it's clear he is indeed a Trump fan, he is marked as a Donny Epstein vote.

If more polling companies are doing that, it might eliminate some of the trump overperformance in the ballot booth. And therefore the polls might be more accurate this time. Fingers crossed.

This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:31pm EDT

re: WinstonSmith

WinstonSmith wrote:
Jorgon wrote:
We all know why you won't watch that video I told you to watch. You can't admit that you are pro-Islamic-terrorist-negotiation. I don't know how you people got that way. It's like the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 mean nothing to you. Just ancient history to the MAG@. It's sad. You are a very gullible type of people. You get sold on all kinds of fakery and lies.
People like you cheered on 9/11.
Meanwhile, your buddy Bin Laden was killed in 2011 and there was no reason in the world for the US to remain in Afghanistan.

People like you shed a tear when Bin Laden was killed. Then you negotiated with the Taliban that harbored him for all the years before and after he planned the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. You like negotiating with Islamic terrorists. There's a video where Trump admits he negotiates with Islamic terrorists. You were supposed to watch it. But you lied and didn't watch it. You can't bring yourself to watch it. It's packs too much of a wallop for your MAG@ fragility.

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:32pm EDT

re: WinstonSmith

WinstonSmith wrote:
agip wrote:
maybe Trump shouldn't have tried to get Pence killed. Just spitballing here.
More than 200 Republicans who previously worked for either former President George W. Bush, the late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., or Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president in an open letter Monday obtained exclusively by USA TODAY.
From the letter: "Of course, we have plenty of honest, ideological disagreements with Vice President Harris and Gov. Walz. That’s to be expected. The alternative, however, is simply untenable."
Almost September 2024 and you cultist imbeciles still haven't figured out that the neocons are all in your party now...

Is "neocon" the new word for anyone who doesn't kiss Trump's *ss?

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:32pm EDT

re: Ghost of Disco Gary

Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Kamala is applying for a job but is refusing to be interviewed for it. This is called DEI privilege.
Mean tweets 2024!

You are freaking out and we are loving it.

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:33pm EDT

re: agip

agip wrote:
maybe Trump shouldn't have tried to get Pence killed. Just spitballing here.
More than 200 Republicans who previously worked for either former President George W. Bush, the late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., or Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president in an open letter Monday obtained exclusively by USA TODAY.
From the letter: "Of course, we have plenty of honest, ideological disagreements with Vice President Harris and Gov. Walz. That’s to be expected. The alternative, however, is simply untenable."

I predict Bush will come out and support Harris, and when that happens Trump will implode.

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:34pm EDT

re: agip

agip wrote:
WORLDS APART wrote:
538 polling average has Harris up by 2.9 in MI. A month ago, Trump was up by 0.9.
In Wisconsin, Harris is up by 3.6 points. On August 1, she was up 1.2.
In PA, Harris is up by 1.5 points. On July 30, she was up by 0.5.
Yes, it's close, and you could probably say that it's a toss up in those 3 states. But in all 3 states, Harris has made up ground over the last month or so and has a lead in all 3 states. She is trending in the right direction, while Trump is sinking. Unless the orange man can turn it around, Harris is going to continue to attract the undecided voters, and by November she'll be ahead by much more.
Bottom line, anyone would rather be in Harris' position than Trump's at this time.
yeah the only problem is that Trump always does 3-4 points better than the polls.
which means he'd probably win if the election were today.
Although I did read an interesting bit from one polling company, trying to adjust for distrustful alienated m'agas:
In the past, if m'agas just started screaming at the pollster, it was marked as a 'no answer.'
now, if a m'aga starts screaming at the pollster and it's clear he is indeed a Donny Epstein fan, he is marked as a Trump vote.
If more polling companies are doing that, it might eliminate some of the trump overperformance in the ballot booth. And therefore the polls might be more accurate this time. Fingers crossed.

I get it, there's a margin of error and the polls can be inaccurate.

But I think it's safe to say that it's tight right now, but momentum is on Harris' side.

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:36pm EDT

re: Independent Ian

Independent Ian wrote:
Swing state voter here, a true independent. I hate all these people equally. I was going to vote for trump against biden for three reasons and harris was reason #2.

Translation: I'm a dyed in the wool Trumpette.

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:36pm EDT

re: Jorgon

Jorgon wrote:
WinstonSmith wrote:
People like you cheered on 9/11.
Meanwhile, your buddy Bin Laden was killed in 2011 and there was no reason in the world for the US to remain in Afghanistan.
People like you shed a tear when Bin Laden was killed. Then you negotiated with the Taliban that harbored him for all the years before and after he planned the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. You like negotiating with Islamic terrorists. There's a video where Trump admits he negotiates with Islamic terrorists. You were supposed to watch it. But you lied and didn't watch it. You can't bring yourself to watch it. It's packs too much of a wallop for your MAG@ fragility.

Hilarious that the pro-Hamas leftist is trying to lecture anyone about negotiating with terrorists. Your party literally advocated for terror groups in congress.

Why do you keep calling the Taliban "terrorists"?? The approved Democrat term is "freedom fighters".

Trump negotiated a conditional withdrawal with the Taliban. If they acted like terrorists he'd bomb the hell out of them. Meanwhile, your diaper wearing hero and Kamala bent over backwards to give the Taliban the entire country and all of the money and hardware they'd need to brutalize the population.

You remain an idiot.

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:37pm EDT

re: Oh Whore

Oh Whore wrote:
agip wrote:
maybe Trump shouldn't have tried to get Pence killed. Just spitballing here.
More than 200 Republicans who previously worked for either former President George W. Bush, the late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., or Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president in an open letter Monday obtained exclusively by USA TODAY.
From the letter: "Of course, we have plenty of honest, ideological disagreements with Vice President Harris and Gov. Walz. That’s to be expected. The alternative, however, is simply untenable."
I predict Bush will come out and support Harris, and when that happens Trump will implode.

nah m'aga would take it as a badge of honor

look at what our resident chief m'aga is saying: that the old R party was bad.

And yeah to be fair, Bush2 was a very very very bad president. They're right about that one.

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:38pm EDT

re: WORLDS APART

WORLDS APART wrote:
agip wrote:
yeah the only problem is that Trump always does 3-4 points better than the polls.
which means he'd probably win if the election were today.
Although I did read an interesting bit from one polling company, trying to adjust for distrustful alienated m'agas:
In the past, if m'agas just started screaming at the pollster, it was marked as a 'no answer.'
now, if a m'aga starts screaming at the pollster and it's clear he is indeed a Donny Epstein fan, he is marked as a Trump vote.
If more polling companies are doing that, it might eliminate some of the trump overperformance in the ballot booth. And therefore the polls might be more accurate this time. Fingers crossed.
I get it, there's a margin of error and the polls can be inaccurate.
But I think it's safe to say that it's tight right now, but momentum is on Harris' side.

She's at high tide and she's still losing.

Once she starts speaking in public her numbers will plummet.

She got ZERO votes in 2020 if you recall. Democrats hated her so much she didn't even make it to 2020 let alone Iowa. If you think independents are going to like her fake @ss more than the Democrats (who hate her) you're on crack.

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:41pm EDT

re: agip

agip wrote:
WORLDS APART wrote:
538 polling average has Harris up by 2.9 in MI. A month ago, Trump was up by 0.9.
In Wisconsin, Harris is up by 3.6 points. On August 1, she was up 1.2.
In PA, Harris is up by 1.5 points. On July 30, she was up by 0.5.
Yes, it's close, and you could probably say that it's a toss up in those 3 states. But in all 3 states, Harris has made up ground over the last month or so and has a lead in all 3 states. She is trending in the right direction, while Trump is sinking. Unless the orange man can turn it around, Harris is going to continue to attract the undecided voters, and by November she'll be ahead by much more.
Bottom line, anyone would rather be in Harris' position than Trump's at this time.
yeah the only problem is that Trump always does 3-4 points better than the polls.
which means he'd probably win if the election were today.
Although I did read an interesting bit from one polling company, trying to adjust for distrustful alienated m'agas:
In the past, if m'agas just started screaming at the pollster, it was marked as a 'no answer.'
now, if a m'aga starts screaming at the pollster and it's clear he is indeed a Trump fan, he is marked as a Donny Epstein vote.
If more polling companies are doing that, it might eliminate some of the trump overperformance in the ballot booth. And therefore the polls might be more accurate this time. Fingers crossed.

Trump is always underpolled.

Kamala's convention bounce is miniscule and her honeymoon ended too. She is one debate away from her doom.

She will approach Sleepy Joe polling numbers as we get closer to election night.

America is not electing a Marxist ticket.

This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:42pm EDT

re: agip

agip wrote:
WORLDS APART wrote:
538 polling average has Harris up by 2.9 in MI. A month ago, Trump was up by 0.9.
In Wisconsin, Harris is up by 3.6 points. On August 1, she was up 1.2.
In PA, Harris is up by 1.5 points. On July 30, she was up by 0.5.
Yes, it's close, and you could probably say that it's a toss up in those 3 states. But in all 3 states, Harris has made up ground over the last month or so and has a lead in all 3 states. She is trending in the right direction, while Trump is sinking. Unless the orange man can turn it around, Harris is going to continue to attract the undecided voters, and by November she'll be ahead by much more.
Bottom line, anyone would rather be in Harris' position than Trump's at this time.
yeah the only problem is that Trump always does 3-4 points better than the polls.
which means he'd probably win if the election were today.
Although I did read an interesting bit from one polling company, trying to adjust for distrustful alienated m'agas:
In the past, if m'agas just started screaming at the pollster, it was marked as a 'no answer.'
now, if a m'aga starts screaming at the pollster and it's clear he is indeed a Donny Epstein fan, he is marked as a Trump vote.
If more polling companies are doing that, it might eliminate some of the trump overperformance in the ballot booth. And therefore the polls might be more accurate this time. Fingers crossed.

I think a good chunk of non committed voters are motivated by momentum and the polls won't reflect that level honesty. People don't want to side with losers. They may say they are for Harris or Trump but as we get closer to election if their pick seems to be on their way to losing that voter might just stay home.

I'll leave it at this. Senile Biden did not even campaign in 2020 and he beat Trump the incumbent. Harris is young, sharp, superbly funded, knows how to control the headlines, and the Ds are united. Trump is that much older now, he's got a terrible VP, he is stuck in a lot of issues that both side care about a lot, and he's focused only on commenting his m6ga base and not appealing to new voters. Oh and let's not forget Nikki consistently took 15-25% of primary votes and she ran an anti-trump campaign. Worse of all, Trump has no answer to Harris' rise.

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:42pm EDT

re: WinstonSmith

WinstonSmith wrote:
WORLDS APART wrote:
I get it, there's a margin of error and the polls can be inaccurate.
But I think it's safe to say that it's tight right now, but momentum is on Harris' side.
She's at high tide and she's still losing.
Once she starts speaking in public her numbers will plummet.
She got ZERO votes in 2020 if you recall. Democrats hated her so much she didn't even make it to 2020 let alone Iowa. If you think independents are going to like her fake @ss more than the Democrats (who hate her) you're on crack.

Correct!

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:45pm EDT

re: Trollminator

So this is how another precious week starts for Trump. We are seeing embarrassing headlines about his team wanting his mic to be muted during the debate. Instead of finding something good on Harris or talking policy, we get yet another small circus act. Trump is the ultimate clown show.

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:46pm EDT

re: Ghost of Disco Gary

Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
agip wrote:
yeah the only problem is that Trump always does 3-4 points better than the polls.
which means he'd probably win if the election were today.
Although I did read an interesting bit from one polling company, trying to adjust for distrustful alienated m'agas:
In the past, if m'agas just started screaming at the pollster, it was marked as a 'no answer.'
now, if a m'aga starts screaming at the pollster and it's clear he is indeed a Trump fan, he is marked as a Donny Epstein vote.
If more polling companies are doing that, it might eliminate some of the trump overperformance in the ballot booth. And therefore the polls might be more accurate this time. Fingers crossed.
Trump is always underpolled.
Kamala's convention bounce is miniscule and her honeymoon ended too. She is one debate away from her doom.
She will approach Sleepy Joe polling numbers as we get closer to election night.
America is not electing a Marxist ticket.

😆 🤣 😂 desperation

1 year ago 08/26/2024 5:49pm EDT

re: Oh Whore

Oh Whore wrote:
agip wrote:
maybe Trump shouldn't have tried to get Pence killed. Just spitballing here.
More than 200 Republicans who previously worked for either former President George W. Bush, the late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., or Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president in an open letter Monday obtained exclusively by USA TODAY.
From the letter: "Of course, we have plenty of honest, ideological disagreements with Vice President Harris and Gov. Walz. That’s to be expected. The alternative, however, is simply untenable."
I predict Bush will come out and support Harris, and when that happens Trump will implode.

If Pence grows some more backbone he might endorse her too. Oh and the swifties if she tells them to. That'll devastate him.

Page 484 of 1,459

1 483 484 485 1,459

Next Last

What People Are Talking About On LetsRun

No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.

Reply Replying to

Username

Password

Leave the password field blank to post anonymously.

Post Preview

By posting you acknowledge that you have read and abide by our Terms and Conditions.

Remember me on this device.

Real Runners, Real Reviews

Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt. Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.

What shoe are you reviewing?

Rate your shoe

Overall Rating

Appearance

Comfort

Cushioning

Durability

Value

I would buy this shoe again

Yes No

Would you buy this shoe again?

One-line review. Optional. Your written review provides information to readers that numbers can't.

Email Optional. Required for t-shirt drawing.

Real runner reviews • Community-powered rankings

Official LRC Kamala Harris for President Thread

This thread has already been deleted.

You have been subscribed.

Official LRC Kamala Harris for President Thread

Jump To A Page

Follow agip

Block agip

Follow WinstonSmith

Block WinstonSmith

Follow WinstonSmith

Block WinstonSmith

Follow agip

Block agip

Follow Trollminator

Block Trollminator

Follow Real Obvi

Block Real Obvi

Follow WinstonSmith

Block WinstonSmith

Follow agip

Block agip

Follow WinstonSmith

Block WinstonSmith

Follow Ghost of Disco Gary

Block Ghost of Disco Gary

Follow Trollminator

Block Trollminator

Follow Ghost of Disco Gary

Block Ghost of Disco Gary

Follow Trollminator

Block Trollminator

Follow Trollminator

Block Trollminator

Follow Trollminator

Block Trollminator

Jump To A Page

This thread has already been deleted.

Reply Replying to

You have been subscribed.

Real Runners, Real Reviews