Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Trollminator wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

LOL even you couldn't help messing up this troll job. Pretty good.

https://twitter.com/JC_Christian/status/1273666526747344896?s=20https://twitter.com/gregkarber/status/1273668732485726209?s=20

https://twitter.com/cherijacobus/status/1273795534738927616?s=21

This is starting to look like another big fat lie from Pizza Gaetz....

I’d stay away from this one - it seems genuine and honest. Plenty of better ways to criticize Gaetz.

Trollminator wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

LOL even you couldn't help messing up this troll job. Pretty good.

https://twitter.com/JC_Christian/status/1273666526747344896?s=20https://twitter.com/gregkarber/status/1273668732485726209?s=20

https://twitter.com/cherijacobus/status/1273795534738927616?s=21

This is starting to look like another big fat lie from Pizza Gaetz....

I’d be willing to bet this guy was never adopted and has never even been Gaetz’ dependent. At most it appears Gaetz might have been some kind of mentor given he dated his sister and probably formed some relationship with the guy. He had no problem straight up calling him his son though, in a very opportune political moment. I am generally against prying into people’s personal lives but when you start to uncover lies it tells you a lot about their character. So far all I’ve seen about Gaetz is that he is an entitled, bigoted, childish, attention-hungry blowhard.

agip wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

https://twitter.com/cherijacobus/status/1273795534738927616?s=21

This is starting to look like another big fat lie from Pizza Gaetz....

I’d stay away from this one - it seems genuine and honest. Plenty of better ways to criticize Gaetz.

https://twitter.com/katiehill4ca/status/1273698286939996160?s=21

Yeah I’m not nearly convinced since Gaetz is the one who brought it up. Don’t blame me for not believing anything that comes out of his mouth. A few close people coming to the rescue isn’t going to help much if he used this moment to rub in his Hispanic foreign son.

Katie hill is a liberal democrat. Just let this one go.

Do NOT let it go if you believe Gaetz is being dishonest.

agip wrote:

Katie hill is a liberal democrat. Just let this one go.

No. Katie may be a Democrat but she is also a disgraced party girl. It’s all making sense now with her being close to Matt... I’ll wait to hear from Nestor’s sister before passing further judgement though.

semsurrrrrrrr wrote:

Do NOT let it go if you believe Gaetz is being dishonest.

Yeah he is a trump-loving bold face liar and I have no reason to believe anything that guy says. And Katie trying to come to the rescue doesn’t exactly help him. All I see right now is an opportunist who is exploiting his relationship with this kid because he got owned in a debate about racial issues. He has a criminal past and ethics has not been his strong point. Like I said I will wait to hear from the sister/ex-GF and then make up my mind on this specific issue. Facts so far: he did not adopt this kid, he lived with him at some point because he was his former GF’s brother, and he has only made references to him in the past as an “intern” and “helper”.

Looks like Amy K just pushed Harris at the top of the list for VP. Warren is definitely done.

...and what could you uncover about Gaetz here? Where are you going with this?

Trump sinking lower and lower...

https://twitter.com/glennkesslerwp/status/1273774312739295234?s=21

Is the book full of lies or full of classified into

Which is it?

How about that he’s a next level lier like trump, willing to really dig so deep in a lie that he potentially asked Nestor to cover for him. He is not his fkn father and he volunteered that he is when no one was asking. It smells like a preemptive reveal. Possible a story was about to break here and he’s trying to jump ahead of it.

I’m not going anywhere with this btw. The guy is an elected official so I’d like to see him held accountable if he’s full of $hit.

agip wrote:

SDSU Aztec wrote:

Biden was OK during the Democrat debates so I don't see the magical moment of dementia that the Trump campaign people are hoping for.

Trump is not a good debator and would get an F in a college debate. He goes on tangents that make you forget what the question was, talks over his opponents and will try to blame Biden for anything negative that happened during the Obama presidency or even over the last 40 years. He'll probably take some shots at Hunter Biden as well.

One debate would be plenty and having four is ridiculous. It would be like watching 4 Trump rallies.

The problem will be when trump attacks and lies and misrepresents Biden’s record. I do think joe will get flustered at those moments and that could hurt.

I still don't see it. No way 4 will happen. I say only a 10% chance of just one debate and a 90% chance of zero debates. Trump is calling for 4 debates now because he knows that will never happen, and he will ultimately blame Biden, say he "chickened out" or some such thing.

Doesn't really matter what happens between now and election day. Debates or not, Biden wins if he is breathing.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Dementia Joe's "rally" yesterday. Look at all of that energy & excitement!

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ea0lxfZWkAEzWwG?format=jpg&name=small

Because most Democrats are smart enough to stay home during a pandemic, you nimrod.

Biff, you are getting dumber and dumber. How is that even possible?

"Come on, man!"

Smorbun wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Dementia Joe's "rally" yesterday. Look at all of that energy & excitement!

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ea0lxfZWkAEzWwG?format=jpg&name=small

Because most Democrats are smart enough to stay home during a pandemic, you nimrod.

Biff, you are getting dumber and dumber. How is that even possible?

Most democrats continue to riot in our cities, idiot.

This is Sourpole at a Dementia Joe rally.

Enjoy your loss.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Most [D]emocrats continue to riot in our cities, idiot.

Y'know, someone who makes an obviously, observably false claim like "most Democrats continue to riot in our cities" . . . probably shouldn't introduce a word like "idiot" into the discussion.

Just seems like poor strategy, you know?

Since WWII, American presidents have been in office through good, booming, lousy, and "meh" economies. Despite variable economies, each of Donald Trump's dozen post-war predecessors has spent at least some time with an approval rating above 60%, and most of them have been above 70% for a while.

President Trump has been in office for 1,246 days. For more than a thousand of them he presided over a *very* strong economy. Yet he has not had even 50% approval on a single day.

Sad.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/