Perhaps you think crooks have to be smart? Here we’re talking about a pandemic plan, but you trumpanzees can only work more scams.
Perhaps you think crooks have to be smart? Here we’re talking about a pandemic plan, but you trumpanzees can only work more scams.
Sally Vix wrote:
...assaulted a women....
No grammar class at trump u?
Sally Vix wrote:
semsurrrrrrrrr wrote:
Relax Sally Trump has already defended Biden saying it didn’t happen.
Biden said all female accusers should be believed. Are you supporting Biden? If so, do you agree that all women accusers should be believed, i.e,, Biden assaulted a defenseless woman? Do you agree that what Biden did - we are believing the lady after all according to Biden that all women accusers are truthful - that Biden should be in jail and never see the White House? If we believe the woman - like he said - he is a pathetic assaulter of women. You agree with that?
Please redo this incoherent gibberish you call a post
Have conservatives just thrown in the towel with the whole fiscal conservative principles?
It hasn’t been a talking point on Fox for well over three years now.
semsurrrrrrrr wrote:
Have conservatives just thrown in the towel with the whole fiscal conservative principles?
It hasn’t been a talking point on Fox for well over three years now.
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-52537938
when it costs the government maybe $4 billion in interest to borrow a trillion dollars...it's actually not that irresponsible. $4 bn is a rounding error, esp when much of it is paid to the federal reserve, which hands it back to the US treasury.
That said, the Rs will certainly be against such borrowing starting January 21, 2021.
This is going to be big news eventually.
Trump knows he is going to lose, so his people are taking control of OANN, a nutjob right wing conspiracy hawking 'news' organization.
When trump leaves office he will try to be a media baron, spewing his garbage around the country.
Apparently Trump is angry at Fox, because he thinks Fox owes its life to Trump and it isn't quite subservient enough.
I always said that Trump ran for president in order to start a media company so he could be a right wing talk radio guy. That's his fondest wish and here's how he will do it.
We are used to presidents being quiet after leaving office. That's not going to happen this time.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/05/trump-is-really-aiming-to-take-down-fox
If he can stay out of jail (doubtful).
agip wrote:
This is going to be big news eventually.
Trump knows he is going to lose, so his people are taking control of OANN, a nutjob right wing conspiracy hawking 'news' organization.
When trump leaves office he will try to be a media baron, spewing his garbage around the country.
Apparently Trump is angry at Fox, because he thinks Fox owes its life to Trump and it isn't quite subservient enough.
I always said that Trump ran for president in order to start a media company so he could be a right wing talk radio guy. That's his fondest wish and here's how he will do it.
We are used to presidents being quiet after leaving office. That's not going to happen this time.
Expect that the former Fox News #1 talking head will join the rebranded TAN (Trump America Network) as their #1 heading head, Sean Hannity.
Trollminator wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Biden said all female accusers should be believed. Are you supporting Biden? If so, do you agree that all women accusers should be believed, i.e,, Biden assaulted a defenseless woman? Do you agree that what Biden did - we are believing the lady after all according to Biden that all women accusers are truthful - that Biden should be in jail and never see the White House? If we believe the woman - like he said - he is a pathetic assaulter of women. You agree with that?
Please redo this incoherent gibberish you call a post
Your request is beyond Sally's ability.
agip wrote:
This is going to be big news eventually.
Trump knows he is going to lose, so his people are taking control of OANN, a nutjob right wing conspiracy hawking 'news' organization.
When trump leaves office he will try to be a media baron, spewing his garbage around the country.
Apparently Trump is angry at Fox, because he thinks Fox owes its life to Trump and it isn't quite subservient enough.
I always said that Trump ran for president in order to start a media company so he could be a right wing talk radio guy. That's his fondest wish and here's how he will do it.
We are used to presidents being quiet after leaving office. That's not going to happen this time.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/05/trump-is-really-aiming-to-take-down-fox
Trump never wanted to win to begin with, this was always the plan so I’m not surprised to see this!!
Fox News is bad enough, this would be insufferable!!!
jesseriley wrote:
If he can stay out of jail (doubtful).
He’ll stay out of jail for some reason no matter how corrupt leaders are they always seem to stay out of jail. He’ll forever go down as the most corrupt and worst president ever. Jesse Riley is constantly the most accurate and top poster on here, kudos to you!!
agip wrote:
This is going to be big news eventually.
Trump knows he is going to lose, so his people are taking control of OANN, a nutjob right wing conspiracy hawking 'news' organization.
When trump leaves office he will try to be a media baron, spewing his garbage around the country.
Apparently Trump is angry at Fox, because he thinks Fox owes its life to Trump and it isn't quite subservient enough.
I always said that Trump ran for president in order to start a media company so he could be a right wing talk radio guy. That's his fondest wish and here's how he will do it.
We are used to presidents being quiet after leaving office. That's not going to happen this time.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/05/trump-is-really-aiming-to-take-down-fox
It takes talent to be successful in talk radio like Rush and Trump doesn't have good speaking skills. His broadcast would be a daily, nonsensical, rally like monologue. Even his most ardent fans would soon tire of it. Attending a rally with likeminded people and listening to a speech on the radio are two different things.
semsurrrrrrrr wrote:
Have conservatives just thrown in the towel with the whole fiscal conservative principles?
It hasn’t been a talking point on Fox for well over three years now.
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-52537938
Nope, they will restart again in 2021 as Joe tries to salvage the mess President Knownothing has created.
agip wrote:
This is going to be big news eventually.
Trump knows he is going to lose, so his people are taking control of OANN, a nutjob right wing conspiracy hawking 'news' organization.
When trump leaves office he will try to be a media baron, spewing his garbage around the country.
Apparently Trump is angry at Fox, because he thinks Fox owes its life to Trump and it isn't quite subservient enough.
I always said that Trump ran for president in order to start a media company so he could be a right wing talk radio guy. That's his fondest wish and here's how he will do it.
We are used to presidents being quiet after leaving office. That's not going to happen this time.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/05/trump-is-really-aiming-to-take-down-fox
And he may we’ll become very rich with this plan if he’s not tossed in the brig. FOX has a monopoly on right-wing nutjob news. Trump figures correctly that there is market share to take. Fk FOX and trump.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
agip wrote:
This is going to be big news eventually.
Trump knows he is going to lose, so his people are taking control of OANN, a nutjob right wing conspiracy hawking 'news' organization.
When trump leaves office he will try to be a media baron, spewing his garbage around the country.
Apparently Trump is angry at Fox, because he thinks Fox owes its life to Trump and it isn't quite subservient enough.
I always said that Trump ran for president in order to start a media company so he could be a right wing talk radio guy. That's his fondest wish and here's how he will do it.
We are used to presidents being quiet after leaving office. That's not going to happen this time.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/05/trump-is-really-aiming-to-take-down-foxIt takes talent to be successful in talk radio like Rush and Trump doesn't have good speaking skills. His broadcast would be a daily, nonsensical, rally like monologue. Even his most ardent fans would soon tire of it. Attending a rally with likeminded people and listening to a speech on the radio are two different things.
And imagine having to work for him, tending to his constant need for praise and in general taking marching orders from a downright moron.
5/4 data
Today is a big day in virus statland.
Every Tuesday for a while has been a very bad day, presumably functioning as the day hospitals process all the paperwork for casualties over the weekend.
Tuesday April 28 was a particularly bad day, with deaths up 39% over Monday the 27th. The US had a +78% day.
That 39%/78% day has made the seven day average of change in daily deaths look very bad. That day rolls out of the 7 day average after today.
So 3 day averages are pretty good right now, but not 7 day averages.
World 3 day average change in daily deaths:
Negative 8% per day. Which is one of the better numbers we've seen.
But
World 7 day average is the same as it's ever been: +1% per day.
US is the same as it's been:
3 day average: Negative 9% per day
7 day average: +4% day
The Italy/France/Spain group has been improving slowly.
7 day change: Negative 2%.
That group was 60%+ of world deaths for a long time but now it's just 16% or so.
The US has been in the 30-40% range of total global deaths for a while.
No change in relative standings of Sweden or the US in terms of deaths per million.
agip wrote:
5/4 data
Today is a big day in virus statland.
Every Tuesday for a while has been a very bad day, presumably functioning as the day hospitals process all the paperwork for casualties over the weekend.
Tuesday April 28 was a particularly bad day, with deaths up 39% over Monday the 27th. The US had a +78% day.
That 39%/78% day has made the seven day average of change in daily deaths look very bad. That day rolls out of the 7 day average after today.
So 3 day averages are pretty good right now, but not 7 day averages.
World 3 day average change in daily deaths:
Negative 8% per day. Which is one of the better numbers we've seen.
But
World 7 day average is the same as it's ever been: +1% per day.
US is the same as it's been:
3 day average: Negative 9% per day
7 day average: +4% day
The Italy/France/Spain group has been improving slowly.
7 day change: Negative 2%.
That group was 60%+ of world deaths for a long time but now it's just 16% or so.
The US has been in the 30-40% range of total global deaths for a while.
No change in relative standings of Sweden or the US in terms of deaths per million.
point is, if today, Tuesday the Cinco de Mayo, is *not* a giant catastrophe day, the 7 day averages will go decidedly negative. Maybe for the first time.
right now the global *6* day global average is *negative 6%.*
In the US the *6* day average is *negative 9%*
Shows you how Tuesdays have affected the data and how the data are not pure mathematics - they are produced by humans on a human schedule.
Trollminator wrote:
FOX has a monopoly on right-wing nutjob news. Trump figures correctly that there is market share to take. Fk FOX and trump.
FOX has a monopoly? I guess you have not seen OANN. Or Newsmax TV for that matter.