Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

agip wrote:

Everyone seems to like Harris, other than anti-police types. But those people aren't voting anyway. She's the right choice.

I hate police and I am voting.

Harris is not a plus.

Umm, yeah . . . wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Let me reiterate for the record: I believe Biden's running mate will be Elizabeth Warren.

I *do* think that Warren would be a valuable Cabinet member. She is seriously oriented toward, not just ideology, but *making things work*. That's a tremendous asset in a Cabinet secretary.

I'm totally in the tank for Warren but I would rather have her a Treasury Secretary.

That is a governance position for me, not an election strategy.

I can only think of Harris and Warren for VP. I think it would be a waste for Warren to be VP, unless Biden has a clear plan to include her heavily in policy building and will somehow keep the spotlight on her. Needless to say, I prefer her over Harris given her accomplishments and mastery of all issues.

Arguably the SOS position is more desirable for someone aiming for the WH later and I think Warren would be very strong. It is very unfortunate that Warren doesn't seem to be liked enough, but there is a place for her in top leadership. I would love to see her debate Pence, lol.

You dodge all the facts that your one-dimensional brain can’t imagine, agip.

The current damage is already covered in-depth on the other thread, including economic damage since not everyone is stupid enough to experiment with their lives by going out, and others are dependent on the failing export market: a big factor since the domestic market is not large.

moderates suck wrote:

Umm, yeah . . . wrote:

I *do* think that Warren would be a valuable Cabinet member. She is seriously oriented toward, not just ideology, but *making things work*. That's a tremendous asset in a Cabinet secretary.

I'm totally in the tank for Warren but I would rather have her a Treasury Secretary.

That is a governance position for me, not an election strategy.

Ha! I can hear the GOP screaming and spreading fear if her name was even mentioned for Treasury Secretary. It would be hard for them to stomach someone in charge of the treasury actually working for the people.

Trollminator wrote:

I can only think of Harris and Warren for VP. I think it would be a waste for Warren to be VP, unless Biden has a clear plan to include her heavily in policy building and will somehow keep the spotlight on her. Needless to say, I prefer her over Harris given her accomplishments and mastery of all issues.

Arguably the SOS position is more desirable for someone aiming for the WH later and I think Warren would be very strong. It is very unfortunate that Warren doesn't seem to be liked enough, but there is a place for her in top leadership. I would love to see her debate Pence, lol.

Warren SOS?

has warren been concerned with international affairs? Doesn't seem to be her thing. Maybe I'm wrong.

I'm not sure what position is best for her. She's not very popular even in her state. And hardly a diplomat.

She'll probably just stay in the senate.

Amy K should take over Chuck Schumer's job - that guy is useless.

(All about Sweden, had to take a call.)

jesseriley wrote:

You dodge all the facts that your one-dimensional brain can’t imagine, agip.

The current damage is already covered in-depth on the other thread, including economic damage since not everyone is stupid enough to experiment with their lives by going out, and others are dependent on the failing export market: a big factor since the domestic market is not large.

I guess I have to go back to ignoring your posts. Every once in a while you pop up and are reasonable but then you go back to trolling. I can't stand trolls. Best ignored.

jesseriley wrote:

You dodge all the facts that your one-dimensional brain can’t imagine, agip.

The current damage is already covered in-depth on the other thread, including economic damage since not everyone is stupid enough to experiment with their lives by going out, and others are dependent on the failing export market: a big factor since the domestic market is not large.

(Sweden)

moderates suck wrote:

agip wrote:

Everyone seems to like Harris, other than anti-police types. But those people aren't voting anyway. She's the right choice.

I hate police and I am voting.

Harris is not a plus.

Would you vote for a Biden/Harris ticket?

Yes thanks troll.

Trolls are anonymous like you; I use my name which you can google, and I’ve been doxxed several times already.

With old man Biden, the VP has to be ready to take over as president within a year of his inauguration.

agip wrote:

moderates suck wrote:

I hate police and I am voting.

Harris is not a plus.

Would you vote for a Biden/Harris ticket?

I am currently planning to vote for Biden. I don't know if a Harris nomination would change my vote, but it sure wouldn't help.

Trollminator wrote:

Ha! I can hear the GOP screaming and spreading fear if her name was even mentioned for Treasury Secretary. It would be hard for them to stomach someone in charge of the treasury actually working for the people.

Well, nobody has to mention it until after the election.

Hopefully there will be a Dem. Senate as well.

L L wrote:

With old man Biden, the VP has to be ready to take over as president within a year of his inauguration.

agreed, and that's why he'd never pick Stacy Abrams or Val Demings. He knows he could die, he knows he probably wont' run for another term, and he knows whoever is VP is likely to be the Dem nominee in 2024 or 2028. He doesn't want a novice in that position.

I think you overestimate the dislike non-lefties have for her. I just haven't seen the evidence that moderate Democrats have a big problem with her. And among those who do have a problem, I don't see Biden losing a single vote because Warren is on the ticket.

On the other hand, Biden needs progressives to turn out this time. Harris doesn't help with that. Warren does.

Trollminator wrote:

moderates suck wrote:

I'm totally in the tank for Warren but I would rather have her a Treasury Secretary.

That is a governance position for me, not an election strategy.

Ha! I can hear the GOP screaming and spreading fear if her name was even mentioned for Treasury Secretary. It would be hard for them to stomach someone in charge of the treasury actually working for the people.

Stomach issues among the GOP would be a plus indeed.

I think the evidence that moderate dems don't like warren is that she lost so badly in 2020...and that she has done quite poorly in her elections in Mass. I think according to 538 she does rather appallingly among Dems in Western Mass. An area which is, I believe, is a lot like must-win PA in demographics. She was THIRD in her own state for Pete's sake. She is just not a very appealing candidate outside white college educated professionals. Who do love her very much. But those people are in the tank for the Dems anyway and will vote for Biden regardless. The ones we need to win over are moderate white suburban women and older black voters. Warren will not help much with them.

Whereas Harris will. I believe.

jesseriley wrote:

Yes, and trump again is calling for a halt to all immigration. He’ll continue trying to blame this on Mexicans. Insane.

The cover story is that he's halting immigration to protect American jobs. It comes as quite the surprise that the recent tidal wave of unemployment claims is because the army of immigrants storming the border rather than the "Covid hoax" shutting down the economy, but there you have it.