Masked Off wrote:
Oooops, these Loser at life "protesters" made a big mistake going into that church. Combine that with don lemon talking and talking, saying the church goers/leaders are supremacists. Losers!
Don Lemon is gay.
-
01
-
more police brutality.
the police should not have been in front of the car and they fired shots through the side windows after the car could no longer be a threat to them.
Murder.
11 -
The so called protesters are out of control.
A group of men enjoying lunch at a Minneapolis deli were bullied by a surging mob who mistook them for Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, video shows.13 -
stalwarts wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
His life wasn't at risk. He shot her as she was driving away. This thread is full of right wing poison like yours.
She hit him. He was hospitalized and is lucky to be alive.
Lies.
21 -
DontLie wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
She was driving away from him. You are blind or self deceiving or both. Why don't you start talking about a second shooter on the grassy knoll?
You’re reacting in a blindly partisan manner as well. 100% without a doubt her wheels were turned to the left when she accelerated. If you can’t admit this simple pure fact then you’re dishonest to the point that whatever you say next needs to be throughly examined. It is an unarguable position to take that her wheels weren’t pointed left. That is a complete and utter lie.
She was trying to drive away from him. He was trying to stop her. He was enraged at her telling him she "wasn't angry" with him and with her wife mocking him. His killing her was about pride, ego and hate, not the direction you believe her wheels were pointing.
32 -
stalwarts wrote:
joedlrt wrote:
Quick reminder that anti-ice protestors killed two detainees and shot another at an ICE facility in Texas. Over 750 ICE officers were assaulted last year. 60 were assaulted with vehicles last year. They committed a felony intimidating worshippers at a church service. They are even harassing their own.
Stupid leftist woman asks if one of the guys would support her riot crew.
"The way you guys are acting? No. And I don’t support ICE either, "I’m just trying to enjoy my lunch!"
So they support the Gestapo over their fellow citizens. Hope the lunch was worth it.
23 -
Armstronglivs wrote:
stalwarts wrote:
Stupid leftist woman asks if one of the guys would support her riot crew.
"The way you guys are acting? No. And I don’t support ICE either, "I’m just trying to enjoy my lunch!"
So they support the Gestapo over their fellow citizens. Hope the lunch was worth it.
you really do not understand English. Or maybe are just very stupid? "And I don’t support ICE either"
sounds like harass first, ask questions second, then ignore answers
12 -
stalwarts wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
She wasn't. That is your self serving delusion.
I know that she wasn't a 4,000 lb woman. That was a typo.
She did try to kill him with a 4,000 lb weapon.
She didn't. She told him she wasn't angry with him. She was trying to drive away from him and he was trying to prevent her - for which he had no legal right. You construct reality to fit your politics.
11 -
reallybroreally wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
So they support the Gestapo over their fellow citizens. Hope the lunch was worth it.
you really do not understand English. Or maybe are just very stupid? "And I don’t support ICE either"
sounds like harass first, ask questions second, then ignore answers
They failed to see there is no equivalence between ICE and their fellow citizens. ICE are your Gestapo - government secret agents who commit crimes without accountability.
11 -
stalwarts wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
He wasn't run over. There was no chance he was. He got out of the road of the vehicle and walked away. After killing a person he didn't like. He's a murderer.
Watch the video.
Hasn't helped you. I've seen videos that clearly show she was no threat to his life.
31 -
stalwarts wrote:
Masked Off wrote:
Oooops, these Loser at life "protesters" made a big mistake going into that church. Combine that with don lemon talking and talking, saying the church goers/leaders are supremacists. Losers!
Don Lemon is gay.
But not a jerk, like some of you.
20 -
Armstronglivs wrote:
reallybroreally wrote:
you really do not understand English. Or maybe are just very stupid? "And I don’t support ICE either"
sounds like harass first, ask questions second, then ignore answers
They failed to see there is no equivalence between ICE and their fellow citizens. ICE are your Gestapo - government secret agents who commit crimes without accountability.
so in other words, when you stated "They support ICE", you lied. That seems to happen a lot with you.
12 -
These threads remind me of the Ahmaud Arbery threads, the case of the black jogger in Georgia murdered by a couple of rednecks. They were endlessly defended here but the rednecks were convicted. You guys are always justifying and defending the rednecks - in this case the secret police, ICE.
The victim, Renee Good, was entitled to drive away from the ICE agent as she had committed no crime; they had no authority to arrest or detain her as she wasn't obstructing them. She was trying to leave. Ross was exceeding his powers to try to stop her and he committed culpable homicide by shooting her. Calling her a "f*cking b*tch" showed exactly what his motivations were.
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.41 -
reallybroreally wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
They failed to see there is no equivalence between ICE and their fellow citizens. ICE are your Gestapo - government secret agents who commit crimes without accountability.
so in other words, when you stated "They support ICE", you lied. That seems to happen a lot with you.
Their false equivalence between their fellow citizens and ICE means they supported ICE. You aren't bright enough to see that.
21 -
Armstronglivs wrote:
DontLie wrote:
You’re reacting in a blindly partisan manner as well. 100% without a doubt her wheels were turned to the left when she accelerated. If you can’t admit this simple pure fact then you’re dishonest to the point that whatever you say next needs to be throughly examined. It is an unarguable position to take that her wheels weren’t pointed left. That is a complete and utter lie.
She was trying to drive away from him. He was trying to stop her. He was enraged at her telling him she "wasn't angry" with him and with her wife mocking him. His killing her was about pride, ego and hate, not the direction you believe her wheels were pointing.
Her wheels were turned left when she accelerated.
12 -
DontLie wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
She was trying to drive away from him. He was trying to stop her. He was enraged at her telling him she "wasn't angry" with him and with her wife mocking him. His killing her was about pride, ego and hate, not the direction you believe her wheels were pointing.
Her wheels were turned left when she accelerated.
Whatever direction they were turned in for what was only a moment does not show an intent to kill or that his life was in danger. If she had intended to harm him the car would have been driven directly at him, at speed, and over a significant distance. That would show intent. But that wasn't what happened. Your garbage about the direction her wheels were turned is just that - garbage. She had just said to his face she wasn't angry with him. She tried to drive away and he tried to stop her for, which he did not have the legal authority as she wasn't obstructing him. But he couldn't cope with being challenged. So he called her a "f*cking b*tch" and shot her 3 times in the head.
10 -
Armstronglivs wrote:
DontLie wrote:
Her wheels were turned left when she accelerated.
Whatever direction they were turned in for what was only a moment does not show an intent to kill or that his life was in danger. If she had intended to harm him the car would have been driven directly at him, at speed, and over a significant distance. That would show intent. But that wasn't what happened. Your garbage about the direction her wheels were turned is just that - garbage. She had just said to his face she wasn't angry with him. She tried to drive away and he tried to stop her for, which he did not have the legal authority as she wasn't obstructing him. But he couldn't cope with being challenged. So he called her a "f*cking b*tch" and shot her 3 times in the head.
So have we finally established when she recklessly accelerated forward, to the point her tires broke traction, her wheels were pointed to the left?
11 -
DontLie wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Whatever direction they were turned in for what was only a moment does not show an intent to kill or that his life was in danger. If she had intended to harm him the car would have been driven directly at him, at speed, and over a significant distance. That would show intent. But that wasn't what happened. Your garbage about the direction her wheels were turned is just that - garbage. She had just said to his face she wasn't angry with him. She tried to drive away and he tried to stop her for, which he did not have the legal authority as she wasn't obstructing him. But he couldn't cope with being challenged. So he called her a "f*cking b*tch" and shot her 3 times in the head.
So have we finally established when she recklessly accelerated forward, to the point her tires broke traction, her wheels were pointed to the left?
No, she wasn't driving recklessly. She wasn't driving at speed. She was trying to drive away from the person who then killed her. He didn't have the legal right to stop her. His words and actions indicate he was motivated by malice.
11 -
DontLie wrote:
So have we finally established when she recklessly accelerated forward, to the point her tires broke traction, her wheels were pointed to the left?
i got it about 45 pages ago, lol. it was clear from the first slo mo. the funny thing is its the basis for their argument, whereas the fact she hit him is far more important.
01
1 post was removed from this page.
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.