The SPONSOR of the bill said boys can menstruate. So must be in boys bathrooms. And what about girls who identify as boys?. They menstruate too.
Your turn genius. Read the text of the law and tell me where is require they be put in the boys restroom.
If you can't you can kindly shut up.
Do you know the difference between explicit and implicit? Again, the sponsor of the bill said not only females menstruate. Well, if males can menstruate, according to the bill, they must be provided with pads and tampons. Also, boys can identify as girls. Can girls identify as boys? If one girl identifies as a boy and uses the boys' bathroom, pads and tampons MUST be provided in that bathroom.
Your turn genius. Read the text of the law and tell me where is require they be put in the boys restroom.
If you can't you can kindly shut up.
Do you know the difference between explicit and implicit? Again, the sponsor of the bill said not only females menstruate. Well, if males can menstruate, according to the bill, they must be provided with pads and tampons. Also, boys can identify as girls. Can girls identify as boys? If one girl identifies as a boy and uses the boys' bathroom, pads and tampons MUST be provided in that bathroom.
Your turn genius. Read the text of the law and tell me where is require they be put in the boys restroom.
If you can't you can kindly shut up.
Do you know the difference between explicit and implicit? Again, the sponsor of the bill said not only females menstruate. Well, if males can menstruate, according to the bill, they must be provided with pads and tampons. Also, boys can identify as girls. Can girls identify as boys? If one girl identifies as a boy and uses the boys' bathroom, pads and tampons MUST be provided in that bathroom.
There's no such thing as implicit in the letter of the law. The law is very explicit. It clearly states:
121A.212 ACCESS TO MENSTRUAL PRODUCTS. A school district or charter school must provide students with access to menstrual products at no charge. The products must be available to all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12 according to a plan developed by the school district. For purposes of this section, "menstrual products" means pads, tampons, or other similar products used in connection with the menstrual cycle.
Here's the thing that you're too dumb to understand. The law doesn't require that the products are placed in all restrooms. It just says in restrooms regularly used by students. It doesn't even specify which kind of restroom. That could be 1 girls restroom per school. That fulfills the requirement of that statute.
I'll give you another chance to prove me wrong. Please point out where the law requires tampons in boys restrooms.
Do you know the difference between explicit and implicit? Again, the sponsor of the bill said not only females menstruate. Well, if males can menstruate, according to the bill, they must be provided with pads and tampons. Also, boys can identify as girls. Can girls identify as boys? If one girl identifies as a boy and uses the boys' bathroom, pads and tampons MUST be provided in that bathroom.
liar
the bill does not say boys menstruate
The sponsor of the bill DOES SAY boys menstruate. And girls menstruate too.
Do you know the difference between explicit and implicit? Again, the sponsor of the bill said not only females menstruate. Well, if males can menstruate, according to the bill, they must be provided with pads and tampons. Also, boys can identify as girls. Can girls identify as boys? If one girl identifies as a boy and uses the boys' bathroom, pads and tampons MUST be provided in that bathroom.
liar
the bill does not say boys menstruate
And the bill doesn't say girls menstruate either, does it?
Coulter was right. That kid is weird. Not beta-groom-wears-dress-to-his-own-wedding type weird, but still weird.
Coulter is pretty weird herself. Talk about a childless cat shrew. What happened to her? She faded bad. Couldn't sustain. And despite the Christalytics, she remains unmarried and barren.
Trump has no respect for the majority of MAG@s. He thinks they are lower class and unintelligent. I completely agree. After years of observing MAG@s, I can absolutely say there are below average people in every criterion that matters.
And the bill doesn't say girls menstruate either, does it?
Correct. What's your point?
If the school has someone like Nikki Hiltz, non-binary and/or transgender, and some days she uses the boys room and some days she uses the girl room, then EVERY bathroom in that school needs to have pads and tampons. Yes?
If the school has someone like Nikki Hiltz, non-binary and/or transgender, and some days she uses the boys room and some days she uses the girl room, then EVERY bathroom in that school needs to have pads and tampons. Yes?
No because if you do that then it'll spark the curiosity with inbreds like Winston, Sally and Gary and they'll start to question their own sex and gender. Tampons! Quick, run for your lives!!!
The sponsor of the bill DOES SAY boys menstruate. And girls menstruate too.
The sponsor of the bill isn't the law
What does the law say?
Cowboy Sally has been corrected on this point multiple times already.
She is pure, 100% troll. Her pattern is way too obvious by now for anyone to still think she is anything but.
1) Make ridiculous claim (even one that has gone through the cycle many times before) 2) Have claim proven wrong unequivocally 3) Repeat ridiculous claim 4) Have folks point out that claim was clearly proven to be incorrect 5) Repeat ridiculous claim - now daring anyone to prove them wrong 6) Have folks point out that they are tired of proving this claim wrong 7) Repeat ridiculous claim. Compound it by claiming that no "lib" is able to even address it 8) Have someone shout out, "LOOK AT THE F'ING PROOF THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN SHOWN TO YOU EIGHT TIMES, YOU MORON!!!" 9) Reply that poster is being rude and that only "libs" are rude 10) Have some "saint" on here very politely point out that the claim is pure BS, completely made up by Breitbart & Co. 11) Thank saint for "finally" providing the answer. Give kudos (saint now reverts back to "Maybe Sally isn't a troll. Maybe she is just a lost soul.") 12) Make new ridiculous claim 13) Have new claim proven wrong unequivocally 14) Repeat new ridiculous claim . . . And so on, ad infinitum
Sorry, but this is classic trolling. And there is no way that it is anything other than trolling.
If the school has someone like Nikki Hiltz, non-binary and/or transgender, and some days she uses the boys room and some days she uses the girl room, then EVERY bathroom in that school needs to have pads and tampons. Yes?
Wrong. The law doesn't require that.
Your problem is, you lack reading comprehension. Point to the text that states it's required in every restroom used by students that menstruate. Heck, point to where it says has to be placed in restrooms used by students that menstruate.
If the school has someone like Nikki Hiltz, non-binary and/or transgender, and some days she uses the boys room and some days she uses the girl room, then EVERY bathroom in that school needs to have pads and tampons. Yes?
Wrong. The law doesn't require that.
Your problem is, you lack reading comprehension. Point to the text that states it's required in every restroom used by students that menstruate. Heck, point to where it says has to be placed in restrooms used by students that menstruate.
Please, I'll wait.
You don't know too much about law. You have the letter of the law or the literal reading of the law and you have the spirit of the law looking at the intent of the law. You are engaging in the former and why you are wrong. You want to look at what the people who wrote the law were intending when they did indeed write the law.
What does Kamala keep spewing 'one day one' when she's in power now to make these changes? She's a fraud and even the Dems see it. They hope she loses so Newscum can be elevated in 2028.
Your problem is, you lack reading comprehension. Point to the text that states it's required in every restroom used by students that menstruate. Heck, point to where it says has to be placed in restrooms used by students that menstruate.
Please, I'll wait.
You don't know too much about law. You have the letter of the law or the literal reading of the law and you have the spirit of the law looking at the intent of the law. You are engaging in the former and why you are wrong. You want to look at what the people who wrote the law were intending when they did indeed write the law.
Your problem is, you lack reading comprehension. Point to the text that states it's required in every restroom used by students that menstruate. Heck, point to where it says has to be placed in restrooms used by students that menstruate.
Please, I'll wait.
You don't know too much about law. You have the letter of the law or the literal reading of the law and you have the spirit of the law looking at the intent of the law. You are engaging in the former and why you are wrong. You want to look at what the people who wrote the law were intending when they did indeed write the law.
What does Kamala keep spewing 'one day one' when she's in power now to make these changes? She's a fraud and even the Dems see it. They hope she loses so Newscum can be elevated in 2028.
Harris owns you now and there is nothing you can do. Enjoy your loss! 👋 🤠 🇺🇸
Your problem is, you lack reading comprehension. Point to the text that states it's required in every restroom used by students that menstruate. Heck, point to where it says has to be placed in restrooms used by students that menstruate.
Please, I'll wait.
You don't know too much about law. You have the letter of the law or the literal reading of the law and you have the spirit of the law looking at the intent of the law. You are engaging in the former and why you are wrong. You want to look at what the people who wrote the law were intending when they did indeed write the law.
Hey moron. Not only do you misunderstand the letter of the law, you also misunderstand the spirit of the law.
The spirit of the law (the intent) is to provide the products to those that need them.
So neither the letter of the law nor the spirit of the law requires tampons in boys restrooms.
