Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

If Bernie runs away with this, rest assured trump is going to Find a way to disgust and anger that many more young libs and fire them up to vote. If he taps into even a small portion of those new young voters it is game over for trump. Bernie has been increasing consistent at mobilizing the youngsters. He’s finding a new piece of the pie, while trump merely tries to keep what he had before. Goddamn it would be glorious to watch Bernie of all candidates ruin him.

America will not elect an angry old nutjob commie with a bad ticker to the WH.

Enjoy your loss.

KAG2020

The biggest question is will the meltdown and subsequent riots be worse than last time Trump won.

Do You Remember? wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

America will not elect an angry old nutjob commie with a bad ticker to the WH.

Enjoy your loss.

KAG2020

The biggest question is will the meltdown and subsequent riots be worse than last time Trump won.

Uh oh, 84 out 93 superdelegates said they’d ignore a plurality of voters, and instead pick someone who “we could all get behind & celebrate.”

The Bernie bros WILL riot if this scenario occurs.

Trump is at -8.7% net approval....

H.W Bush was at -8.6 net approval at this point in his reelection campaign....

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/

Sanders will win because he isnt Trump. Anybody else would easily beat Sanders.

What this means is back to back 1 term presidents as we elect radical presidents who fall outside of the mainstream.

Alan

Runningart2004 wrote:

Trump is at -8.7% net approval....

H.W Bush was at -8.6 net approval at this point in his reelection campaign....

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/

Sanders will win because he isnt Trump. Anybody else would easily beat Sanders.

What this means is back to back 1 term presidents as we elect radical presidents who fall outside of the mainstream.

Alan

538 showed approval rates of every president since Truman, and Trump's disapproval rating at this point was worse than all of them. He was closest to George HW. We haven't had a president who has generated this much hate and discord. He seems to revel and feed off hate and cruelty. He is clear about only being president for his base.

Under Trump's leadership, the wealthy got too greedy and hence we get an uprising from the lower economic class with the Bernie socialist rebellion. Sure Trump's populism will keep a group of low economic people voting against their economic interests but not enough to stop the Bernie rebellion.

It has become a class battle of the extremes. Selfishness of the business rich, lead by Trump, have hurt the appeal of the moderate Democrat. The anti trump antirich uprising demands more and Bernie fills that niche. Free giveaways paid for by the rich is his platform and it's very appealing.

The voice of reason coming from the moderate Democrats will have a battle in this climate of discord to assert itself. But don't count them out yet.

Runningart2004 wrote:

Yosinglercz wrote:

More reasons not to vote for Sanders.

A vote for Bernie puts Trump back in the White House.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/27/politics/sanders-trump-2020-general/index.html

That map isnt too far off from most elections. Wisconsin is basically what Ohio used to be. Sanders wins WI and PA game over.

I still think states like IA and AZ are more up for grabs.

Alan

You’re right that it’s not too far off most elections, but shows that Sanders performs worse against Trump than against a generic Dem.

This, coupled with the down-ballot issues, could be really bad for Dems in an election against an unpopular, weak President. The House could be in play again.

Good opinion piece in the Times.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/27/opinion/bernie-sanders.html?0p19G=0038

Armstronglivs wrote:

P wrote:

You have proven yourself to be a moron. Sorry, but I have limited patience for morons. I am done with you.

So you can't say that you accept the scientists' report. Thank you for making that clear. Now that we have established just who is the moron here.

Yosinglercz wrote:

Do you consider Democratic Socialists mainstream Dems?

If Bernie wins the nomination then the answer will be "yes".

Fat hurts wrote:

Yosinglercz wrote:

Do you consider Democratic Socialists mainstream Dems?

If Bernie wins the nomination then the answer will be "yes".

Have there been ANY Democrats who said they are opposed to open borders? Have there been any Democrats (and I include Congressmen and Congresswomen) who have said they are opposed to giving health insurance to illegals? The Democrats have gone off the rails. They have become a radical party. To say anything but the party line will get you nothing but smears. Does the Democratic party even allow moderates to voice their opinions anymore? Is there any Democrat who can oppose abortion and not be viciously attacked? The party is a mess.

Fat hurts wrote:

Yosinglercz wrote:

Do you consider Democratic Socialists mainstream Dems?

If Bernie wins the nomination then the answer will be "yes".

Far from it, unless Congressional Dems and the thousands of other local Dem politicians turn Socialist.

A single elected official means little.

Sally Vix wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

If Bernie wins the nomination then the answer will be "yes".

Have there been ANY Democrats who said they are opposed to open borders? Have there been any Democrats (and I include Congressmen and Congresswomen) who have said they are opposed to giving health insurance to illegals? The Democrats have gone off the rails. They have become a radical party. To say anything but the party line will get you nothing but smears. Does the Democratic party even allow moderates to voice their opinions anymore? Is there any Democrat who can oppose abortion and not be viciously attacked? The party is a mess.

This post of your proves how ignorant you are. Not even worth a point by point refutation because you have proven not to be able to understand anything anyway. The only thing you have even remotely right is the abortion stance, and that's because legal abortion has been settled in this country, and it is the right thing to allow women to have one. Discussion based on knowledge is not for you.

“The House is in play”???

So ignorant, my young incel friend. No one disputes that R’s are leaving the House because they are stuck in the minority, they’ve said so themselves.

BREAKING NEWS...

Biden announces VP pick—Barack HUSSEIN Obama!!!!!!

This is allowed under the 22nd amendment! Neither the Constitution's eligibility provisions nor the Twenty-second Amendment's presidential term limit explicitly disqualify a twice-elected president from serving as vice president.

LOL! Suck it cons!!!!! Biden-OBAMA 2020 FTW! Black voter turnout out just went through the MFing roof, yo! Buh-buy Donnie enjoy federal prison.

Another insightful post from my trolling revolutionary Bernie-Bro friend.

Viva la revolucion!

Yosinglercz wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

If Bernie wins the nomination then the answer will be "yes".

Far from it, unless Congressional Dems and the thousands of other local Dem politicians turn Socialist.

A single elected official means little.

The president or presidential nominee is always dubbed the leader of the party.

Also, the question was will Democtratic Socialists be considered mainstream Dems. If Bernie is the nominee then the answer will be a resounding "Yes!"

Fat hurts wrote:

Yosinglercz wrote:

Far from it, unless Congressional Dems and the thousands of other local Dem politicians turn Socialist.

A single elected official means little.

The president or presidential nominee is always dubbed the leader of the party.

Also, the question was will Democtratic Socialists be considered mainstream Dems. If Bernie is the nominee then the answer will be a resounding "Yes!"

I don't see why not. It's basically what Trump has done despite him not really being a Republican

Fat hurts wrote:

Yosinglercz wrote:

Far from it, unless Congressional Dems and the thousands of other local Dem politicians turn Socialist.

A single elected official means little.

The president or presidential nominee is always dubbed the leader of the party.

Also, the question was will Democtratic Socialists be considered mainstream Dems. If Bernie is the nominee then the answer will be a resounding "Yes!"

If that is the case, who is the leader of the Dem Party now? Or, from Jan 2017 until now? HRC, the last Dem nominee?

With FDR, dems turned left very successfully. The key was that pubs offered a poor alternative (just like now) and revolution was waiting even further left (currently possible, but more because of fallout from environmental concerns than poverty).

"A team of researchers in the U.S. and the U.K. found that global warming has caused a shift in wind patterns that are ultimately bringing more warm ocean water into contact with the region’s ice."

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-reason-antarctica-is-melting-shifting-winds-driven-by-global-warming/

One more for the climate-change deniers here, like Sally, who think it's all "a crock".