No disrespect, but your opinion of the bill is irrelevant.
It passed in the Senate, and it would have passed in the House had Trump not shot it down.
“This is clear. Mike Johnson simply needs to put the bipartisan national security bill on the House floor for an up-or-down vote, and it will pass,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday. “That’s it.” Rep. Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), the senior Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, delivered a similar warning. “We’ve got a bill; it’s got bipartisan support in the Senate. It ought to be sent up here for a vote. … And you know what? It would pass overwhelmingly,” she said.
“The key aspect of this, again, is are we, as Republicans, going to have press conferences and complain the border’s bad and then intentionally leave it open after the worst month in American history in December?” Lankford argued.
What the F*CK do Ukraine and Israel have to do with national security?
Trump doesn't have any votes. Trump didn't kill the bill. Intelligent people who read the bill and saw that it was complete and utter dogsh*t killed the bill.
You can repeat the idiotic propaganda all you like.
The bill itself was terrible and would have done NOTHING to improve the situation at the border.
and yet the bill was not killed because of anything like what you say
the bill was killed in order to keep immigrants flowing over the border, to keep the nation in crisis. To help Donny J Epstein's campaign.
dodge and weave all you want. but that's the facts, jack.
most americans understand that is bad. You do not.
No disrespect, but your opinion of the bill is irrelevant.
It passed in the Senate, and it would have passed in the House had Trump not shot it down.
“This is clear. Mike Johnson simply needs to put the bipartisan national security bill on the House floor for an up-or-down vote, and it will pass,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday. “That’s it.” Rep. Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), the senior Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, delivered a similar warning. “We’ve got a bill; it’s got bipartisan support in the Senate. It ought to be sent up here for a vote. … And you know what? It would pass overwhelmingly,” she said.
“The key aspect of this, again, is are we, as Republicans, going to have press conferences and complain the border’s bad and then intentionally leave it open after the worst month in American history in December?” Lankford argued.
What the F*CK do Ukraine and Israel have to do with national security?
Trump doesn't have any votes. Trump didn't kill the bill. Intelligent people who read the bill and saw that it was complete and utter dogsh*t killed the bill.
You can repeat the idiotic propaganda all you like.
The bill itself was terrible and would have done NOTHING to improve the situation at the border.
No disrespect, but your opinion of the bill is irrelevant.
It passed in the Senate, and it would have passed in the House had Trump not shot it down.
“This is clear. Mike Johnson simply needs to put the bipartisan national security bill on the House floor for an up-or-down vote, and it will pass,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday. “That’s it.” Rep. Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), the senior Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, delivered a similar warning. “We’ve got a bill; it’s got bipartisan support in the Senate. It ought to be sent up here for a vote. … And you know what? It would pass overwhelmingly,” she said.
“The key aspect of this, again, is are we, as Republicans, going to have press conferences and complain the border’s bad and then intentionally leave it open after the worst month in American history in December?” Lankford argued.
What the F*CK do Ukraine and Israel have to do with national security?
Trump doesn't have any votes. Trump didn't kill the bill. Intelligent people who read the bill and saw that it was complete and utter dogsh*t killed the bill.
You can repeat the idiotic propaganda all you like.
The bill itself was terrible and would have done NOTHING to improve the situation at the border.
Wrong again. You didn't like the bill, we get it. Unless you're in Congress, your opinion of the bill doesn't matter to me.
The bill would have passed had Mike Johnson put it up for a vote. Mike Johnson didn't put it up for a vote because Trump told him not to (Trump admitted he killed the bill!), so Trump could use the border for political purposes. Lankford suggested as much in his statement, where he states that Republicans complain about the border but then intentionally leave it open.
Some people who know a little more about the border than you or I seem to think that the bill would have been good for the country:
How about the president of the National Border Patrol Council? The council, which represents approximately 18,000 Border Patrol agents and support personnel, endorsed Sinema’s border security package. Brandon Judd, president of the council, said in part in a statement after the bill was introduced, “The Border Act of 2024 will give U.S. Border Patrol agents authorities codified, in law, that we have not had in the past. This will allow us to remove single adults expeditiously and without a lengthy judicial review which historically has required the release of these individuals into the interior of the United States.
“This alone will drop illegal border crossings nationwide and will allow our agents to get back to detecting and apprehending those who want to cross our borders illegally and evade apprehension. While not perfect, the Border Act of 2024 is a step in the right direction and is far better than the current status quo."
What the F*CK do Ukraine and Israel have to do with national security?
Trump doesn't have any votes. Trump didn't kill the bill. Intelligent people who read the bill and saw that it was complete and utter dogsh*t killed the bill.
You can repeat the idiotic propaganda all you like.
The bill itself was terrible and would have done NOTHING to improve the situation at the border.
and yet the bill was not killed because of anything like what you say
the bill was killed in order to keep immigrants flowing over the border, to keep the nation in crisis. To help Donny J Epstein's campaign.
dodge and weave all you want. but that's the facts, jack.
most americans understand that is bad. You do not.
NO..... That's why your cult told you it was voted down.
You have no idea what a fact is. Literally everything you think you know is filtered to your through a cult.
Banning travel from China was pointless. I had Covid-19 in January 2020 and I had never been to China. I had been to Mexico, and in several other areas scattered across the USA. No idea where I picked it up. Didn't know I was an early case until much later on.
Trump is a terrible leader and would absolutely minimize a threat, as he did with Covid, if he thinks it makes him look bad. A more sober, honest approach to the early stages of the pandemic may well have saved lives.
Except we have an entire globe worth of data which shows you're wrong.
You idiots are so invested in blaming absolutely everything on the scary orange man that you make yourselves look like unhinged morons.
The most damage done by COVID was done by Democrat lockdowns enforced by people like Newsom and Whitmer who completely ignored the rules they imposed in their own lives.
Outdoor church was a "super spreader event" while rioting over stupid sh*t was perfectly fine.
The Democrats completely and utterly sh*t the bed on COVID. Why you idiots think this is a winning topic for you is baffling.
Whatever you think Trump did poorly Biden went on to be even more incompetent. You lose both ways.
You're not even responding to the points. A globe worth of data that shows I'm wrong about what? Wrong that Covid had already spread to the USA prior to January 19? There's plenty of data to suggest that Covid was already present in December 2019. So a travel ban from China was pointless.
Wrong that Trump's approach is open to criticism? Are you serious? Check the timeline posted before where he claimed it would disappear in two weeks. All this stuff is public record: "…when you have 15 people, and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero, that’s a pretty good job we’ve done." (2/26/20).
People actually believed that crap, you know.
I live in a red state that was almost completely locked down. Are you blaming Democrats for that?
What the F*CK do Ukraine and Israel have to do with national security?
Trump doesn't have any votes. Trump didn't kill the bill. Intelligent people who read the bill and saw that it was complete and utter dogsh*t killed the bill.
You can repeat the idiotic propaganda all you like.
The bill itself was terrible and would have done NOTHING to improve the situation at the border.
What was terrible about it?
The bill called for about $114,000,000,000 in spending.
Of that almost 90% of the money that would need to be printed would be sent to foreign countries.
That alone is enough information to kill the stupid bill.
The fraction of printed money that was actually allocated to our own country would be used almost entirely to speed up the asylum process rather than fix it.
This alone is enough information to kill the stupid bill.
Except we have an entire globe worth of data which shows you're wrong.
You idiots are so invested in blaming absolutely everything on the scary orange man that you make yourselves look like unhinged morons.
The most damage done by COVID was done by Democrat lockdowns enforced by people like Newsom and Whitmer who completely ignored the rules they imposed in their own lives.
Outdoor church was a "super spreader event" while rioting over stupid sh*t was perfectly fine.
The Democrats completely and utterly sh*t the bed on COVID. Why you idiots think this is a winning topic for you is baffling.
Whatever you think Trump did poorly Biden went on to be even more incompetent. You lose both ways.
You're not even responding to the points. A globe worth of data that shows I'm wrong about what? Wrong that Covid had already spread to the USA prior to January 19? There's plenty of data to suggest that Covid was already present in December 2019. So a travel ban from China was pointless.
Wrong that Trump's approach is open to criticism? Are you serious? Check the timeline posted before where he claimed it would disappear in two weeks. All this stuff is public record: "…when you have 15 people, and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero, that’s a pretty good job we’ve done." (2/26/20).
People actually believed that crap, you know.
I live in a red state that was almost completely locked down. Are you blaming Democrats for that?
Countries all responded in different ways to COVID and the data shows that none of the responses made a difference.
Doing literally nothing would have been more effective than anything you were advocating for.
Under Tim Walz, Minnesota has adopted an ethnic studies curriculum for all students, written by anti-Israeli activists. Kids are taught about “racial capitalism” and how minorities suffer under “European beauty standards.” This is what’s behind the normal guy facade.
No disrespect, but your opinion of the bill is irrelevant.
It passed in the Senate, and it would have passed in the House had Trump not shot it down.
“This is clear. Mike Johnson simply needs to put the bipartisan national security bill on the House floor for an up-or-down vote, and it will pass,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday. “That’s it.” Rep. Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), the senior Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, delivered a similar warning. “We’ve got a bill; it’s got bipartisan support in the Senate. It ought to be sent up here for a vote. … And you know what? It would pass overwhelmingly,” she said.
“The key aspect of this, again, is are we, as Republicans, going to have press conferences and complain the border’s bad and then intentionally leave it open after the worst month in American history in December?” Lankford argued.
What the F*CK do Ukraine and Israel have to do with national security?
Trump doesn't have any votes. Trump didn't kill the bill. Intelligent people who read the bill and saw that it was complete and utter dogsh*t killed the bill.
You can repeat the idiotic propaganda all you like.
The bill itself was terrible and would have done NOTHING to improve the situation at the border.
The House didn't have a problem with the fact that the border security bill was joined with aid to Ukraine and Israel. They had a problem with the border security part of the bill. And to be clear, the problem they had with the bill was that Trump didn't want it passed.
After Trump shot the border bill down, separate bills providing for aid to Ukraine and Israel were passed by the House.
The bill called for about $114,000,000,000 in spending.
Of that almost 90% of the money that would need to be printed would be sent to foreign countries.
That alone is enough information to kill the stupid bill.
The fraction of printed money that was actually allocated to our own country would be used almost entirely to speed up the asylum process rather than fix it.
This alone is enough information to kill the stupid bill.
You're 100% wrong. Here's the text of the bill. It outlines exactly where the money is spent. Please point out where $102,600,000,000 is to be sent to foreign countries.
Nobody said it was voted down. It wasn't voted down. It passed the Senate. Didn't come to a vote in the House.
You made a claim that it was a crap bill. You never answered. What was bad about it?
The Democrat senate passed it and the GoP House said it was dead on arrival.
When a bill is so bad the Speaker won't even bring it to the floor it's a bad bill.
Why was it dead on arrival? Please explain. Here's Trump on video admitting to killing the bill, because it would be good for the other side. Is he lying or are you lying?
What the F*CK do Ukraine and Israel have to do with national security?
Trump doesn't have any votes. Trump didn't kill the bill. Intelligent people who read the bill and saw that it was complete and utter dogsh*t killed the bill.
You can repeat the idiotic propaganda all you like.
The bill itself was terrible and would have done NOTHING to improve the situation at the border.
The House didn't have a problem with the fact that the border security bill was joined with aid to Ukraine and Israel. They had a problem with the border security part of the bill. And to be clear, the problem they had with the bill was that Trump didn't want it passed.
After Trump shot the border bill down, separate bills providing for aid to Ukraine and Israel were passed by the House.
