Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Trollminator wrote:

When it comes to defeating trump, I don't care if it's JC, Mickey Mouse, or some wrestler, I'll take anyone with a slightly better moral compass and intellect than him.

There it is. The soft bigotry of low expectations.

Such an inspiring endorsement to run on!

You believe Gallup polls. Ok. Nuff said. Can I speak to you about a ladder to the moon I am selling?

Trollminator wrote:

Yosinglerzy wrote:

Given his track record and the increasing power of the Executive branch over the last 20 years, he doesn’t need Pelosi.

It seems as though Bloomberg supporters are willing to overlook his bigotry in order to defeat an unlikeable opponent.

Sounds very 2016.

Sorry - BB is no HRC. Comparisons to 2016 are idiotic.

I’ll unignore you for this one. Not surprising you’d think that way. You’ve proven over and over again that you’re not the brightest.

Here’s a hint. The unlikeable GE opponent in 2020 would not be Bloomberg.

agip wrote:

Yosinglerzy wrote:

Sanders needs to get to the convention with enough delegates to secure the nomination. The delegate leader won’t do. He wouldn’t survive the vote.

you seriously think the Dems would nominate someone who had fewer delegates than bernie?

I can't see that happening.

Oh yeah. If it’s a contested convention, Bernie is in trouble.

Esterhazy wrote:

agip wrote:

you and the people may be miserable with their awful American existence but that's a marginal viewpoint.

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Nine in 10 Americans are satisfied with the way things are going in their personal life, a new high in Gallup's four-decade trend. The latest figure bests the previous high of 88% recorded in 2003.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/284285/new-high-americans-satisfied-personal-life.aspx

You believe Gallup polls. Ok. Nuff said. Can I speak to you about a ladder to the moon I am selling?

Cool. Go with your gut and anecdote instead of going with data. You'll be able to keep your views that way.

Yosinglerzy wrote:

agip wrote:

you seriously think the Dems would nominate someone who had fewer delegates than bernie?

I can't see that happening.

Oh yeah. If it’s a contested convention, Bernie is in trouble.

you aren't one of those people who thinks the 2016 dem primary was rigged, are you?

person who agrees..... wrote:

As I say, I agree. For the life of me I never understand why politicians do not do this. It seems like the most logical way to discuss a decision made in the past that one no longer supports... yet they never do.

I agree that this is a good and effective strategy. Possibly the best available to Bloomberg right now.

I am not against politicians changing positions and learning and growing.

The problem with that position is that is looks like (and is) craven political opportunism, not learning and growing. Last January he was both defending stop-and-frisk and denying that it was race-based.

agip wrote:

Cool. Go with your gut and anecdote instead of going with data. You'll be able to keep your views that way.

Oh, the irony

Fat hurts wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

If you fools nominate Crazy Bernie, you just dug your own grave.

#Trumplandslide

KAG2020

You sound scared.

Far from it. You dems should be frightened. All your candidates have less charisma than Cankles & she had none.

My confidence in a Trump victory is as high as ever.

America first.

#Trumplandslide

"Four more years!"

KAG2020

so excited wrote:

agip wrote:

Cool. Go with your gut and anecdote instead of going with data. You'll be able to keep your views that way.

Oh, the irony

this is pretty cool - my own bernie bro type.

dude I am actually flattered.

No one has been like this toward me since the days of Uncle B, a decade ago.

Party on

agip wrote:

Yosinglerzy wrote:

Oh yeah. If it’s a contested convention, Bernie is in trouble.

you aren't one of those people who thinks the 2016 dem primary was rigged, are you?

I am not.

agip wrote:

so excited wrote:

Oh, the irony

this is pretty cool - my own bernie bro type.

dude I am actually flattered.

No one has been like this toward me since the days of Uncle B, a decade ago.

Party on

Uncle B would have hated both Little Mikey & Crazy Bernie since he was an anti-Semite.

Yosinglerzy wrote:

agip wrote:

you aren't one of those people who thinks the 2016 dem primary was rigged, are you?

I am not.

ok well given the bad taste from that whole thing, I can't see the Dems not giving the nomination to whoever has the most delegates coming into the convention.

In theory there could be some coalition building where two candidates agree to combine their delegates prior to the convention but that just seems unamerican. Who sacrifices themselves in american politics? Not what we do.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

agip wrote:

this is pretty cool - my own bernie bro type.

dude I am actually flattered.

No one has been like this toward me since the days of Uncle B, a decade ago.

Party on

Uncle B would have hated both Little Mikey & Crazy Bernie since he was an anti-Semite.

Stop pretending you give a f*ck about bigotry.

So, 'excited', who would you like to be our president in 2020? Doesn't seem like you are for any of the Dems...

agip wrote:

Yosinglerzy wrote:

I am not.

ok well given the bad taste from that whole thing, I can't see the Dems not giving the nomination to whoever has the most delegates coming into the convention.

In theory there could be some coalition building where two candidates agree to combine their delegates prior to the convention but that just seems unamerican. Who sacrifices themselves in american politics? Not what we do.

I can’t see a scenario, for example, where Sanders comes to the convention with 40% of the delegates and walks out with the nomination.

person who agrees..... wrote:

So, 'excited', who would you like to be our president in 2020? Doesn't seem like you are for any of the Dems...

I'm for Warren.

I am in a Super Tuesday state. I am considering Bernie for the primary as well. Waiting to see how things shake out in the next two states.

Corrupt!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-offered-assange-pardon-covered-171516819.html

agip wrote:

Esterhazy wrote:

You believe Gallup polls. Ok. Nuff said. Can I speak to you about a ladder to the moon I am selling?

Cool. Go with your gut and anecdote instead of going with data. You'll be able to keep your views that way.

Those who believe a Gallup poll is "data" are the same people who believe Bloomberg news. Which part of the electorate is represented in that 90% of allegedly content Americans? Which part of those who support Bernie Sanders? Just admit that you don't care about those people and don't think they deserve a say. But don't worry too much. Soon enough they will have even less of a say than they do now.