Yosinglerx wrote:
Are you a female suburbanite?
No. But I know a lot of their innermost thoughts.
Wink Wink[/quote]
^ Incel
Yosinglerx wrote:
Are you a female suburbanite?
No. But I know a lot of their innermost thoughts.
Wink Wink[/quote]
^ Incel
Spotter of Trumpers wrote:
Yosingler wrote:
There is a distinct race to the bottom on this thread by many (including you).
^ Trumanzee living at the bottom of the bottom. Wishes he was the thread mommy.
Trumanzee??
No way. Dewey all the way, brother.
https://www.investing.com/news/economy-news/nearly-95-of-all-job-growth-during-obama-era-part-time,-contract-work-449057Ciro wrote:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/teresaghilarducci/2020/02/09/trumps-economy-isnt-so-great/#67ac60df3ae9https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/482266-on-the-economy-democrats-must-brag-louder-than-trumpI’d have never guessed that, but Barrack Obama creates about 1.5 million MORE jobs in his last three in office than Donald Trump has in his first three years in office.
Barry created PART-TIME jobs.
Furthermore, adding part-time jobs when coming out of a deep recession is NOT the same as adding full-time jobs when at full employment. In the latter, you are replacing BAD JOBS with GOOD JOBS.
Trump wins again.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Barry created PART-TIME jobs.
Trump wins again.
The job market says, "ahem, no!"
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/12/04/jobs-creation-trump-goal-has-fallen-short/4249422002/https://money.cnn.com/2016/11/04/news/economy/jobs-under-obama/index.htmlSpotter of Trumpers wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Barry created PART-TIME jobs.
Trump wins again.
The job market says, "ahem, no!"
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/12/04/jobs-creation-trump-goal-has-fallen-short/4249422002/https://money.cnn.com/2016/11/04/news/economy/jobs-under-obama/index.html
+1, hard luck easily trigged.
Quid Pro Joe talks about putting kids in cages.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/joe-biden-grilled-obama-record-argues-we-kept-them-safe
When Democrats puts kids in cages = good
When Republicans puts kids in cages = bad
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
When Republicans puts kids in cages = bad
I take that you momma is a Republican. She needs to put you back in your cage.
Racket wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
If you are worried about women in the suburbs then those three are winning issues. Our suburbs are filled with women and their families who are uninsured or under-insured. Look it up. The suburbs are suffering.
And there is no denying the growing momentum of the green movement. These suburban women care about the future of their children and they will vote to protect that future from those who heartlessly profit at the expense of our children and grandchildren.
If Bernie is the nominee then Bernie's stance on the environment will be juxtaposed with Tiny's filthy coal obsession. It will be a huge winning issue for Democrats because we can talk about a clean healthy future. Republicans can not.
Well first of all : LOL
Second of all, this is assuming that a significant proportion of people generally vote on issues and not on the party line. Research (and the 2016 election) suggests otherwise.
Besides, most companies are/will soon go green. It's all the rage and quite trendy for Millennials, and most companies see the writing on the wall anyways. There's a reason every major car company is trying to get in on EVs. Tesla's valuation alone is evidence that even Wall Street knows what's up and they're the last ones to ever change anything.
I generally agree that green issues are going to blindside the Rs. They really don't believe people give a carp. But increasingly people do.
So ok, yeah, agreed.
BUT
The D green message will be swamped by kulturwar issues like transgender issues, gay rights, PC talk, campus politics...moms in the suburbs will shrug and say 'yeah I want a greener USA but that's in the future. RIGHT NOW I don't want my kid learning this crazy version of society from Dems in school. We'll deal with coal later.'
That's part of the appeal of Bberg. He doesn't seem to play in the crazy D culture sandbox. They think he might be normal.
Spotter of Trumpers wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Barry created PART-TIME jobs.
Trump wins again.
The job market says, "ahem, no!"
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/12/04/jobs-creation-trump-goal-has-fallen-short/4249422002/https://money.cnn.com/2016/11/04/news/economy/jobs-under-obama/index.html
Maybe you have selective memory. What happened to Obama's "stimulus" that was supposed to create "shovel ready jobs"? It didn't. Those claiming the Obama economy was so great forget that for the first 7 years, Obama blamed Bush for it.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/09/26/how-trump-rescued-our-economy-from-obamas-new-normal/Rigged for Hillary wrote:
https://www.investing.com/news/economy-news/nearly-95-of-all-job-growth-during-obama-era-part-time,-contract-work-449057Ciro wrote:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/teresaghilarducci/2020/02/09/trumps-economy-isnt-so-great/#67ac60df3ae9https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/482266-on-the-economy-democrats-must-brag-louder-than-trumpI’d have never guessed that, but Barrack Obama creates about 1.5 million MORE jobs in his last three in office than Donald Trump has in his first three years in office.
Barry created PART-TIME jobs.
Furthermore, adding part-time jobs when coming out of a deep recession is NOT the same as adding full-time jobs when at full employment. In the latter, you are replacing BAD JOBS with GOOD JOBS.
Trump wins again.
You are an idiot.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EQ3-sfgXsAAN_2a?format=png&name=small
Sure, because making fun of the man's stature is *definitely* better than responding to his ideas.
Disclaimers:
1) I am 6-2.
2) I have never checked the Dem box for any office, in any election.
Smorbun wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Actually, I am very much against cheaters and am surprised that there is not more talk of stripping the Astros of their 2017 World Series championship. I would even be okay with that. Or even just vacate the championship for that year. I am extremely anti-cheating and that is why I would never vote for Barry Bonds or Roger Clemens or the rest of those cheaters admission into the Hall of Fame. Never.
As far as cheating in the 2016 presidential election, Robert Mueller already and quite emphatically confirmed that there was no cheating/collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. In fact, the only cheating/collusion that occurred in 2016 was between the Hillary campaign and the DNC/Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (can she really not do anything with her hair?). That cheated Bernie Sanders out of a possible nomination. Hillary also cheated with paying for the Steele Dossier on Trump. Yes, the real cheaters in 2016 were Hillary, her campaign, the DNC and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. But you Dems had/have no problem supporting a chronic cheater.
Mueller did not say there was no cheating.
Trump committed a felony when he cheated with the campaign finance law violations.
Trump cheated by publicly asking Russia to help find Hillary's e-mails.
Trump cheated again this time around by asking Ukraine and China to investigate Biden.
The bulk of your post is BS spin or actually probly just not understanding on your part because you are ridiculously stupid. Also, you said you would not respond to me anymore. This thread is beyond you. Go away.
Will address just one, the one about Trump cheated by asking for Ukraine and China to investigate Biden. Trump is the Chief Law Enforcement officer of the US. There was ample evidence that the Bidens were engaged in corruption. Fully within Trump's authority as Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the country to get to the bottom of likely corruption.
agip wrote:
Racket wrote:
Well first of all : LOL
Second of all, this is assuming that a significant proportion of people generally vote on issues and not on the party line. Research (and the 2016 election) suggests otherwise.
Besides, most companies are/will soon go green. It's all the rage and quite trendy for Millennials, and most companies see the writing on the wall anyways. There's a reason every major car company is trying to get in on EVs. Tesla's valuation alone is evidence that even Wall Street knows what's up and they're the last ones to ever change anything.
I generally agree that green issues are going to blindside the Rs. They really don't believe people give a carp. But increasingly people do.
So ok, yeah, agreed.
BUT
The D green message will be swamped by kulturwar issues like transgender issues, gay rights, PC talk, campus politics...moms in the suburbs will shrug and say 'yeah I want a greener USA but that's in the future. RIGHT NOW I don't want my kid learning this crazy version of society from Dems in school. We'll deal with coal later.'
That's part of the appeal of Bberg. He doesn't seem to play in the crazy D culture sandbox. They think he might be normal.
If we accept the premise that people will vote on party lines (barring an extreme ideological shift like in South in the 60) then the moms in the suburbs who always vote Republican were never in play to begin with, regardless of the social issues you mentioned.
In my opinion, very few people feel strongly about most of those fringe social issues anyways and they tend to be (shock) young ideological kids in college going through a phase (how's that for PC talk). Most of those issues are just magnified through outrage media (because it generates clicks from Millennials) and outrage-at-the-outrage-media (which is even more lucrative and typically brought to you by boomers). Anyways, that's way off topic
kibitzer wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EQ3-sfgXsAAN_2a?format=png&name=smallSure, because making fun of the man's stature is *definitely* better than responding to his ideas.
Disclaimers:
1) I am 6-2.
2) I have never checked the Dem box for any office, in any election.
As long as the LR libs continue calling Trump "orange man", that is okay with you.
Sally Vix wrote:
Smorbun wrote:
Mueller did not say there was no cheating.
Trump committed a felony when he cheated with the campaign finance law violations.
Trump cheated by publicly asking Russia to help find Hillary's e-mails.
Trump cheated again this time around by asking Ukraine and China to investigate Biden.
The bulk of your post is BS spin or actually probly just not understanding on your part because you are ridiculously stupid. Also, you said you would not respond to me anymore. This thread is beyond you. Go away.
Will address just one, the one about Trump cheated by asking for Ukraine and China to investigate Biden. Trump is the Chief Law Enforcement officer of the US. There was ample evidence that the Bidens were engaged in corruption. Fully within Trump's authority as Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the country to get to the bottom of likely corruption.
Stop watching Fox. There was NOT ample evidence.
It was a case of Trump being Trump.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
As long as the LR libs continue calling Trump "orange man", that is okay with you.
Nope, I think it's stupid and infantile and doesn't address what's important.
Similarly, making fun of his girth is silly.
As is riffing on someone's name (really?). Nicknames are childish.
Yosinglerxy wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Will address just one, the one about Trump cheated by asking for Ukraine and China to investigate Biden. Trump is the Chief Law Enforcement officer of the US. There was ample evidence that the Bidens were engaged in corruption. Fully within Trump's authority as Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the country to get to the bottom of likely corruption.
Stop watching Fox. There was NOT ample evidence.
It was a case of Trump being Trump.
I quit watching Fox 5 or 6 years ago. I almost exclusively watch MSNBC now.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Quid Pro Joe talks about putting kids in cages.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/joe-biden-grilled-obama-record-argues-we-kept-them-safeWhen Democrats puts kids in cages = good
When Republicans puts kids in cages = bad
No equivalence - go back to school
kibitzer wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
As long as the LR libs continue calling Trump "orange man", that is okay with you.
Nope, I think it's stupid and infantile and doesn't address what's important.
Similarly, making fun of his girth is silly.
As is riffing on someone's name (really?). Nicknames are childish.
Trump made it ok. He doesn’t get to mock people and not get mocked back just because he’s POTUS. He’s straight out of a dumpster and deserves getting called out every single day for his horrendous personality and horrendous looks to go with it. He doesn’t respect anyone besides dictators so no one should respect him. He has no respect for the law, for patriots, war heroes, for disabled people, no one.... I will continue to call him every vile name in the book but he deserves much worse than that.