Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Ciro wrote:

single wing wrote:

You should ask a Sanders supporter that question. I am for Warren.

I also am not a democrat and have never said that any voter is obligated to vote for any candidate. It is a question of whether the moderates who have been wrongly excoriating the "Bernie Bros" for four years are going to be consistent.

Ah my bad, same question to you as a Warren backer?

I’ll back Warren or Sanders in a heartbeat over Trump.

If Buttigieg, Biden or Klobuchar got the nomination would you back any or all of them against Trump?

Are you excoriating all your fellow moderates who are saying they won't vote for a progressive? Or is you rage for independent minded voters solely directed at progressives?

Ciro wrote:

single wing wrote:

You should ask a Sanders supporter that question. I am for Warren.

I also am not a democrat and have never said that any voter is obligated to vote for any candidate. It is a question of whether the moderates who have been wrongly excoriating the "Bernie Bros" for four years are going to be consistent.

Ah my bad, same question to you as a Warren backer?

I’ll back Warren or Sanders in a heartbeat over Trump.

If Buttigieg, Biden or Klobuchar got the nomination would you back any or all of them against Trump?

Anybody who thinks agent orange has been one of the most disastrous things that could ever happen to our country should be happily voting for any functioning adult. Sack up, hold your noses and vote for whoever the nominee is. In 2024 if there isn't a trump-like candidate then we will have the luxury of getting picky again.

single wing wrote:

Ciro wrote:

Ah my bad, same question to you as a Warren backer?

I’ll back Warren or Sanders in a heartbeat over Trump.

If Buttigieg, Biden or Klobuchar got the nomination would you back any or all of them against Trump?

Are you excoriating all your fellow moderates who are saying they won't vote for a progressive? Or is you rage for independent minded voters solely directed at progressives?

I’m just curious man, no rage at all.

You are confusing me for a moderate, I am someone who thinks Trump is dangerous and a second term would be a disaster.

DACA, the Muslim travel ban, children in cages, the Supreme Court - huge PROGRESSIVE issues that should not be sacrificed just because I don’t get my preferred candidate.

But I will answer your question. Yes I ABSOLUTELY am encouraging moderates to vote for a more progressive candidate if a more progress candidate wins the nomination.

single wing wrote:

Ciro wrote:

Vote blue no matter who. Are you also onboard if Sanders does not get the nomination?

You should ask a Sanders supporter that question. I am for Warren.

I also am not a democrat and have never said that any voter is obligated to vote for any candidate. It is a question of whether the moderates who have been wrongly excoriating the "Bernie Bros" for four years are going to be consistent.

If you are not a Dem then you are statistically irrelevant. We need to know from registered Dems if they will vote for any nominee to prevent another 4 years of this

Trollminator wrote:

Ciro wrote:

Ah my bad, same question to you as a Warren backer?

I’ll back Warren or Sanders in a heartbeat over Trump.

If Buttigieg, Biden or Klobuchar got the nomination would you back any or all of them against Trump?

Anybody who thinks agent orange has been one of the most disastrous things that could ever happen to our country should be happily voting for any functioning adult. Sack up, hold your noses and vote for whoever the nominee is. In 2024 if there isn't a trump-like candidate then we will have the luxury of getting picky again.

Exactly.

Trollminator wrote:

If you are not a Dem then you are statistically irrelevant. We need to know from registered Dems if they will vote for any nominee to prevent another 4 years of this

I'm not sure that I understand this sentiment.

1) Independents make up something like 38% of the adult population. How can that many potential voters be "statistically irrelevant"?

John Kelly is talking to you directly rigged.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/former-white-house-chief-staff-164143306.html

Ciro wrote:

single wing wrote:

Are you excoriating all your fellow moderates who are saying they won't vote for a progressive? Or is you rage for independent minded voters solely directed at progressives?

I’m just curious man, no rage at all.

You are confusing me for a moderate, I am someone who thinks Trump is dangerous and a second term would be a disaster.

DACA, the Muslim travel ban, children in cages, the Supreme Court - huge PROGRESSIVE issues that should not be sacrificed just because I don’t get my preferred candidate.

But I will answer your question. Yes I ABSOLUTELY am encouraging moderates to vote for a more progressive candidate if a more progress candidate wins the nomination.

Well, I'm not confusing you for a moderate. It was a question I asked of moderates and you answered, so I think you self-identified as that, maybe incorrectly. In any case, it was a collective question and whether you did or not, there was plenty of disdain directed at any Sanders voters who didn't back Clinton (although, one again, they behaved like every other voter). I'm just trying to figure out if moderates are going to the claim the right to other voter's votes as well...

I don't tell other people who they should vote for. I am more than willing to share my opinion of the candidates. I personally will vote the the candidate who best represents me and my views, which is the same thing I do in every single election.

Trollminator wrote:

single wing wrote:

You should ask a Sanders supporter that question. I am for Warren.

I also am not a democrat and have never said that any voter is obligated to vote for any candidate. It is a question of whether the moderates who have been wrongly excoriating the "Bernie Bros" for four years are going to be consistent.

If you are not a Dem then you are statistically irrelevant. We need to know from registered Dems if they will vote for any nominee to prevent another 4 years of this

There are no registered Dems in my state. Or registered Republicans. My state, and a bunch of other states, do not register people by party.

single wing wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

If you are not a Dem then you are statistically irrelevant. We need to know from Dems if they will vote for any nominee to prevent another 4 years of this

There are no registered Dems in my state. Or registered Republicans. My state, and a bunch of other states, do not register people by party.

Fine, see revision

Cool single wide.

Sally Vix wrote:

Fat Hurts - what kind of car/truck do you drive? You are the biggest proponent of saving the planet here and biggest Global Warming person. I really hope you drive a Prius or similar type of car.

Also, can you please post a pic of your bus/train ticket here? You surely are using public transportation. Thanks!

How do you not know the answer to this? Oh, I forgot, you are an idiot. You apparently can't read and retain anything. Fat Hurts talks about his electric car all the time. If you have severe brain damage, a brain tumor, dementia, or some other malady of the brain, that would excuse you from the completely idiotic things you say and reveal about yourself. Otherwise, we all know that you are just as stupid as can be. Why do you continue to post here? This level of conversation is beyond you.

What is Trump talking about? I'm asking about currently and not anything that might have happened in 2016.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1228341384131772416?s=20

But we will keep patiently waiting for that hrc investigation, lol

https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/14/politics/andrew-mccabe-justice-department-investigation/index.html

Trollminator wrote:

But we will keep patiently waiting for that hrc investigation, lol

https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/14/politics/andrew-mccabe-justice-department-investigation/index.html

He’ll lock her up, he promised he would ?

SDSU Aztec wrote:

What is Trump talking about? I'm asking about currently and not anything that might have happened in 2016.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1228341384131772416?s=20

trying to say DNC is in Deep State family

Bottomline is Donald lacks proper English etiquette. He needs to conduct himself in a manner that's consistent with how he conducts himself in person to the people in the world that he's angry at.

It's about having class. Lacking proper English etiquette shows no class. I mean at least he's trying in the best way possible on how to conduct himself. So he gets an A for effort.

But he really needs to learn how to control his anger and hatred and sarcasm. Sarcasm is a form of hatred and anger.

Flagpole wrote:

I am not going to respond to most of this, but your opinion comment is bogus. Opinions for sure can be wrong. Several people have the opinion that the Earth is flat. You didn't state an opinion anyway. You stated something as a fact - "A strong economy is when everyone is happy, not just a majority or select few." That is simply not true.

"The earth is flat" is a factual assertion, not an opinion. It is wrong, but that doesn't make it an opinion.

"Hillary is going to win 100%" is a factual assertion, not an opinion.