Sage with the top comment, who could he be referring to? 😆
"Yep also gotta bring more Energy, Passion and Authentic Vibes too! It's all about the Vibes and being "Authentic" and "Grounded" while appealing to the masses on just some relatable level. Be sure to say something sensational and kind of "science based" like it's the next game changer for that extra 1% in performance boost ! Think like Andrew Huberman, but deliver like Tony Robbins! Sell toxic positivity....errr "positive positivity"....to also sell hope (and amplify sheer materialism and consumerism)!! . Since I'm not coaching you anymore maybe you can even get a code to shill from Runna?!"
This post was edited 51 seconds after it was posted.
Preface by writing Chatbot David went a little overboard on my inquiry, but I digress:
"Ah, the venerable and oftentimes tumultuous realm of the LetsRun message board! Where hope, despair, camaraderie, and vitriol all swirl together in a digital potpourri of human emotion, comparable only to the ancient streets of Athens where philosophers of old would come together in passionate discourse—or, if one prefers, akin to a gladiatorial arena, where opinions clash like swords and the echoes of heated debates reverberate through cyberspace like the fabled roars of Colosseum crowds. I, David Roche—trail runner, coach, Columbia graduate (a proud institution of academic rigors and lofty ideals, naturally), and, lest we forget, holder of a law degree from the esteemed halls of Duke University—must admit, that the LetsRun message board holds a special place in my heart. Indeed, as I sit here by a crackling fire, perhaps between training runs or soothing aching legs with a light stretch (which, you know, one must always do, particularly as the body ages like the fine Bordeaux it sometimes wishes to resemble), I reflect upon the curious amalgamation that is LetsRun. A place where the virtue of our sport—running—becomes both a thing of lofty discussion and absurd mockery in equal measure. It is here, in this realm, that posters with usernames as obscure as "Bananas4Life" and "MileMark13" engage in debates as philosophical as the Socratic dialogues themselves. Some discuss the nuances of training theory, offering sagely advice on tempos and intervals, while others flit about with the speed of a haphazard hare, slinging opinions on marathon splits like javelins, often in the form of snarky one-liners and unfounded bravado. It is a place that tests the limits of patience and endurance, much like the hallowed trails I’ve spent years learning to conquer, though the stakes are not nearly as steep. And let us not forget the fine art of the haters, the ever-present chimeras of negativity, who provide the perfect foil for those of us trying to elevate the conversation to the realms of real training, progress, and, dare I say it, community. To them I say: I love you, even though you are haters. Because in their complaints and grievances, they provide the necessary friction to refine our own running philosophies, sharpening the edge of the discourse as an artist sharpens his chisel. We may not always agree, but within the chaos, there is always something to learn—a new angle, a new approach, or even just a new appreciation for the simplicity of putting one foot in front of the other, as one does when embarking on a trail run in the Cascade Range, or the foothills of Boulder. Huzzah, indeed! Let me pause here for a moment, as a well-educated man (ahem), to reflect upon the historical significance of LetsRun. The message board is, in some respects, the digital equivalent of a Greek symposium, a modern-day space where ideas fly, fall, and flutter away, but also sometimes crystallize into something of true value. The intellectual pursuits of the ancient world now occur not on marble benches or in the shadow of Acropolis, but in the fluorescent glow of screen-lit faces. As I scroll through threads debating the minutiae of carbon-plated shoes, or the virtues of ultra-distance training versus the aggressive, fire-breathing sprints of track running, I can’t help but chuckle to myself with the subtle joy of knowing that I too have contributed to the fray. With my trail-running background and coaching insights, I engage with a degree of passion that perhaps only a law degree from Duke could instill—yes, Duke, where I earned the tools necessary to think with the precision of a litigator but, most importantly, to temper my wit with the intellectual grace of a scholar. As I read the posts by various individuals—who, at times, adopt the eloquence of Virgil, only to then descend into the staccato rants more befitting of a character from a Shakespearean tragedy—I feel that unmistakable sense of belonging. There is a paradox here, one I find both comforting and unnerving. The members of LetsRun are bound together by the unspoken rule that running—whether on roads or trails—is more than just a sport; it’s a way of being, a way of thinking. Yes, let me say it again—thinking—as much as we love to ridicule each other and our respective opinions, this very thoughtfulness (even in its most poorly argued forms) is what makes it all worthwhile. The question of training paces, race strategies, and shoe choices, once only the purview of elite athletes and coaches, has been democratized to the point where a simple “What’s your PR?” now feels like a vital inquiry akin to asking about someone's lineage or favorite Homeric hero. I, David Roche, have been part of this merry band for years, after all. We share this sacred ground of virtual space. And while it may sometimes feel like a cacophony, it is also a chorus. Huzzah! Long live the curious souls who tirelessly post, debate, and challenge one another with a fervor usually reserved for the great philosophical schools. Whether discussing the ethics of doping in sport or pondering the theoretical limits of VO2 max, these digital conversations serve as an intellectual battleground—a place where ideas live and die with a quickness that is both exhilarating and terrifying. In the end, what are we but runners on this wild journey? Searching, debating, striving, and—perhaps most importantly—failing, only to rise again, like the phoenix, from the ashes of our lost hopes, armed with new knowledge and a renewed desire to press onward. And to all those trail runners out there who venture into this fray—do not despair, for your voice, like the solitary runners’ rhythmic footfalls on a mountain trail, is heard. Your opinions, while often shouted down by the cacophony of others, resonate in ways that I, a humble coach and runner, can appreciate. You are the essence of the sport itself: unyielding, determined, and willing to stand firm in the face of the constant winds of internet banter. Let us then continue, in the spirit of both humility and bravado, to ask questions, to challenge, and to grow. And in moments of quiet reflection, I will recall the simple beauty of running—a quiet, solitary act that connects all of us in ways that transcends even the most heated of LetsRun debates. Huzzah, my friends. Huzzah. And once more: I love you, even though you are haters."
"This is Eric Sevareid.
It is one of the minor tragedies of our time that the impulse to parody so often outstrips the talent required to do it well. It is not enough to pretend to be clever, nor is it enough to wield a stale vocabulary like a man swinging a broadsword at an opponent who has already left the room.
This, I regret to inform you, is where 'Lorne Michaels'—who bears no apparent relation to the producer of Saturday Night Live, and certainly no relation to Tom Lehrer—has found himself. He attempts, as many before him have, to send up the distinctive cadences of David Roche, a man whose rhetorical flourishes can, at times, invite such an effort. But to parody a style is to understand it, and it is in that understanding that our friend Lorne has fallen tragically short.
There is no rhythm to his prose. The sentences meander without music, their weight sinking heavily in the reader’s mind like a stone dropped into a still pond—only without the satisfaction of the splash. His words do not dance; they lurch. They do not build; they pile up, undisciplined and formless, collapsing under their own pretension.
And so we find ourselves, once again, where we so often do on these digital back roads of the information age: confronted not with the sharp sting of genuine satire, but with the dull, plodding weight of failed ambition.
I would be remiss if I did not say this much for David Roche: for all his mannerisms, for all his flourishes, there is an internal logic to his style. A rhythm. A voice. A sense of play. And if he is, at times, earnest to a fault, he is at least a man whose words move. The same cannot be said of his would-be parodists.
There is a certain kind of man who believes himself clever, not because he is, but because he assumes cleverness to be the natural byproduct of condescension. He mistakes verbosity for depth, florid prose for thoughtfulness, a well-worn literary reference for wisdom. And worst of all, he believes that to tear something down—someone down—requires no greater skill than to build something up. That it is, in fact, the easier thing. He is wrong.
We also got "pressure is love" from this video which is... a sequence of words.
Maybe it's my emotion-shy Britishness but I can't hear "love you guys" without assuming he's being sarcastic or something. It's so weird.
Also what’s with him reading out loud that rather innocuous tweet saying David was putting a lot of pressure on himself. David reads this as if this is someone “hating” on him. It’s not. It’s not even really criticism. It’s really nothing at all.
But in David’s mind, if you’re not loving or praising him, you’re hating him
We also got "pressure is love" from this video which is... a sequence of words.
Maybe it's my emotion-shy Britishness but I can't hear "love you guys" without assuming he's being sarcastic or something. It's so weird.
Also what’s with him reading out loud that rather innocuous tweet saying David was putting a lot of pressure on himself. David reads this as if this is someone “hating” on him. It’s not. It’s not even really criticism. It’s really nothing at all.
But in David’s mind, if you’re not loving or praising him, you’re hating him
I thought the same. David had one of the all time trail running greats recognizing him in a tweet. Not calling him out at all, but instead offering some (very good in my opinion) advice. But to David that’s fuel for the hate fire. I can’t with this guy anymore.
Classic “love and inclusion” moment in the latest podcast episode: minutes 47:00 to 49:00. Poor Megan can’t even get a word in despite trying multiple times. She finally brings up David’s magical Leadville just to change the topic. Honestly, that exchange was hard to listen to.
Classic “love and inclusion” moment in the latest podcast episode: minutes 47:00 to 49:00. Poor Megan can’t even get a word in despite trying multiple times. She finally brings up David’s magical Leadville just to change the topic. Honestly, that exchange was hard to listen to.
For someone always shouting about “breaking down gender barriers” he sure is good at interrupting his wife and mansplaining…
Sage with the top comment, who could he be referring to? 😆
"Yep also gotta bring more Energy, Passion and Authentic Vibes too! It's all about the Vibes and being "Authentic" and "Grounded" while appealing to the masses on just some relatable level. Be sure to say something sensational and kind of "science based" like it's the next game changer for that extra 1% in performance boost ! Think like Andrew Huberman, but deliver like Tony Robbins! Sell toxic positivity....errr "positive positivity"....to also sell hope (and amplify sheer materialism and consumerism)!! . Since I'm not coaching you anymore maybe you can even get a code to shill from Runna?!"
Sage is definitely not posting in this thread. lol.
Runforthehillz: The Destructive Dialectic of Ideological Self-Preservation
"There are two kinds of critique: one that seeks transformation and one that seeks only to sustain itself. Runforthehillz' belongs firmly to the latter.
István Mészáros, one of the great Marxist theorists of the late 20th century, identified a critical flaw in much of contemporary critique: the tendency for oppositional discourse to become structurally dependent on the very systems it claims to resist. That is, rather than functioning as a force for historical rupture, many so-called critics merely reinforce the ideological framework they claim to expose, unwittingly maintaining the very power relations they profess to despise.
It is through this lens that we must examine Runforthehillz and their ongoing fixation with David Roche. Theirs is not a critique of material conditions, nor even of power in any meaningful sense. It is, rather, a project of discursive self-preservation—one that requires the perpetual reproduction of its chosen adversary.
For Mészáros, genuine critique must always concern itself with structural determinations—the concrete forces that shape social relations and power dynamics. It is not enough to identify the flaws of an individual; one must ask what systemic function that individual serves. But Runforthehillz asks no such questions. Instead, they engage in a ritualized denunciation, one that remains fixated on affect and mannerism: Roche interrupts his wife; Roche is too enthusiastic; Roche has a self-congratulatory tone.
What is the purpose of such a critique? It is not to challenge the real material conditions of running culture—the sponsorship structures that privilege certain demographics, the ways in which athletic labor is commodified, the deeply ingrained hierarchies that determine access to coaching, media representation, and financial security. No, Runforthehillz is engaged in what Mészáros called the destructive dialectic—a form of pseudo-opposition that exists only to reproduce itself.
This is the precise mechanism by which late capitalism neutralizes its critics. By turning systemic problems into personal grievances, by making critique a matter of affect rather than material structures, the ideological apparatus ensures that no real transformation can take place. For what can be changed about Roche’s speaking style? His tone? His enthusiasm? These are not sites of structural oppression but matters of personal taste. And yet, Runforthehillz continues to return to these trivialities, as though they constitute a meaningful political struggle.
What we see here, then, is not a revolutionary project but an adaptive one—one that ensures its own perpetuation by keeping its gaze firmly downward, toward individuals, rather than upward, toward the institutions and economic structures that actually determine the material conditions of the sport.
Mészáros warned of this phenomenon in his work on ideological mystification: 'The dominant ideology does not merely attempt to distort reality—it works to absorb its own opposition, ensuring that critique remains safely within the bounds of the system itself.'
This is exactly what Runforthehillz has done. By fixating on Roche as a symbol, they allow themselves to avoid the harder, more necessary work of structural analysis. They do not challenge the economic foundations of running culture; they merely sneer at those who have found a way to navigate its contradictions with sincerity and, dare one say it, joy.
Thus, the real function of Runforthehillz becomes clear: theirs is not a critique of running’s political economy but a performance of exclusion, a way to situate themselves as arbiters of legitimacy within an ideological space they have no real intention of changing. They are, in Mészáros’ terms, agents of reproduction, ensuring that the existing conditions persist by redirecting energy away from structural critique and into personal disdain.
And so they find themselves trapped in a paradox, locked in a dialectical contradiction of their own making. Roche is at once their target and their necessary condition; his perceived transgressions are both intolerable and indispensable. Without him, their critique has no object, no momentum. And so, like capitalism itself, their opposition does not seek resolution—it seeks continuity.
Because Roche himself is unchanging, the critique of him remains unchanging. Like an assembly line producing the same widget over and over, Runforthehillz churns out the same observations, the same complaints, the same weary posturing. The problem is not that they have exhausted Roche as a subject—it is that they have exhausted themselves as critics.
In the end, one suspects that Runforthehillz is not really critiquing Roche at all, but rather performing the only kind of critique that the system allows: one that changes nothing."
Classic “love and inclusion” moment in the latest podcast episode: minutes 47:00 to 49:00. Poor Megan can’t even get a word in despite trying multiple times. She finally brings up David’s magical Leadville just to change the topic. Honestly, that exchange was hard to listen to.
Like I said earlier on this thread, I'm in weird position semi-defending David because I think some of their training stuff (heat, high-carb fueling, etc) is interesting but think they can be over the top...and don't think David can scare a sub-4 mile if he has actually said that. Apparently that makes me a "fan" or "stan" or whatever on this thread. With that caveat out of the way:
1. Rent-free guys. Truly rent-free. Not just "pookiebear" but all of you. You are clearly slurping up (pun intended) his content with comments like "OMG, he was ridiculous at minute 47 of his new podcast" and "OMG, his 30-minute YouTube video was laughable at minute 18." I'm the so-called stan but I haven't listened to their most recent podcast or watched the video (who has time but secret Roche fans?) yet you guys have.
2. This thread jumped the shark at least 20 pages ago. What is this ChatGPT stuff? Whoever is posting it, it's a wall of text and no one is reading it. The joke is on you for bothering.
3. Wouldn't it be great if we had a thread that picked apart some of the training methodology? We get it, a lot of you don't like the Roches and have invented reasons to say that they are "frauds" and "liars" and whatever else without much evidence. Sure, they are pretty easily parodied with the over-the-top "we love you all" stuff, but let's move on.
Runforthehillz: The Destructive Dialectic of Ideological Self-Preservation
"There are two kinds of critique: one that seeks transformation and one that seeks only to sustain itself. Runforthehillz' belongs firmly to the latter.
István Mészáros, one of the great Marxist theorists of the late 20th century, identified a critical flaw in much of contemporary critique: the tendency for oppositional discourse to become structurally dependent on the very systems it claims to resist. That is, rather than functioning as a force for historical rupture, many so-called critics merely reinforce the ideological framework they claim to expose, unwittingly maintaining the very power relations they profess to despise.
It is through this lens that we must examine Runforthehillz and their ongoing fixation with David Roche. Theirs is not a critique of material conditions, nor even of power in any meaningful sense. It is, rather, a project of discursive self-preservation—one that requires the perpetual reproduction of its chosen adversary.
For Mészáros, genuine critique must always concern itself with structural determinations—the concrete forces that shape social relations and power dynamics. It is not enough to identify the flaws of an individual; one must ask what systemic function that individual serves. But Runforthehillz asks no such questions. Instead, they engage in a ritualized denunciation, one that remains fixated on affect and mannerism: Roche interrupts his wife; Roche is too enthusiastic; Roche has a self-congratulatory tone.
What is the purpose of such a critique? It is not to challenge the real material conditions of running culture—the sponsorship structures that privilege certain demographics, the ways in which athletic labor is commodified, the deeply ingrained hierarchies that determine access to coaching, media representation, and financial security. No, Runforthehillz is engaged in what Mészáros called the destructive dialectic—a form of pseudo-opposition that exists only to reproduce itself.
This is the precise mechanism by which late capitalism neutralizes its critics. By turning systemic problems into personal grievances, by making critique a matter of affect rather than material structures, the ideological apparatus ensures that no real transformation can take place. For what can be changed about Roche’s speaking style? His tone? His enthusiasm? These are not sites of structural oppression but matters of personal taste. And yet, Runforthehillz continues to return to these trivialities, as though they constitute a meaningful political struggle.
What we see here, then, is not a revolutionary project but an adaptive one—one that ensures its own perpetuation by keeping its gaze firmly downward, toward individuals, rather than upward, toward the institutions and economic structures that actually determine the material conditions of the sport.
Mészáros warned of this phenomenon in his work on ideological mystification: 'The dominant ideology does not merely attempt to distort reality—it works to absorb its own opposition, ensuring that critique remains safely within the bounds of the system itself.'
This is exactly what Runforthehillz has done. By fixating on Roche as a symbol, they allow themselves to avoid the harder, more necessary work of structural analysis. They do not challenge the economic foundations of running culture; they merely sneer at those who have found a way to navigate its contradictions with sincerity and, dare one say it, joy.
Thus, the real function of Runforthehillz becomes clear: theirs is not a critique of running’s political economy but a performance of exclusion, a way to situate themselves as arbiters of legitimacy within an ideological space they have no real intention of changing. They are, in Mészáros’ terms, agents of reproduction, ensuring that the existing conditions persist by redirecting energy away from structural critique and into personal disdain.
And so they find themselves trapped in a paradox, locked in a dialectical contradiction of their own making. Roche is at once their target and their necessary condition; his perceived transgressions are both intolerable and indispensable. Without him, their critique has no object, no momentum. And so, like capitalism itself, their opposition does not seek resolution—it seeks continuity.
Because Roche himself is unchanging, the critique of him remains unchanging. Like an assembly line producing the same widget over and over, Runforthehillz churns out the same observations, the same complaints, the same weary posturing. The problem is not that they have exhausted Roche as a subject—it is that they have exhausted themselves as critics.
In the end, one suspects that Runforthehillz is not really critiquing Roche at all, but rather performing the only kind of critique that the system allows: one that changes nothing."
I’m honored you wasted so much time writing about me David. Sorry to say no one is reading all that gibberish. Huzzah!!!
1. Rent-free guys. Truly rent-free. Not just "pookiebear" but all of you. You are clearly slurping up (pun intended) his content with comments like "OMG, he was ridiculous at minute 47 of his new podcast" and "OMG, his 30-minute YouTube video was laughable at minute 18." I'm the so-called stan but I haven't listened to their most recent podcast or watched the video (who has time but secret Roche fans?) yet you guys have.
2. This thread jumped the shark at least 20 pages ago. What is this ChatGPT stuff? Whoever is posting it, it's a wall of text and no one is reading it. The joke is on you for bothering.
1. Rent-free guys. Truly rent-free. Not just "pookiebear" but all of you. You are clearly slurping up (pun intended) his content with comments like "OMG, he was ridiculous at minute 47 of his new podcast" and "OMG, his 30-minute YouTube video was laughable at minute 18." I'm the so-called stan but I haven't listened to their most recent podcast or watched the video (who has time but secret Roche fans?) yet you guys have.
2. This thread jumped the shark at least 20 pages ago. What is this ChatGPT stuff? Whoever is posting it, it's a wall of text and no one is reading it. The joke is on you for bothering.
Chatbot David = high effort troll
Umm, no… = low effort troll
Is the Chatbot stuff "pro-David"? Like I said, I'm not reading it. It's stupid regardless.
Not a troll. Just don't have an irrational hatred for the Roches. Yes, a lot of the stuff on this thread is irrational. The Roches might be a little full of themselves, sure. But all I've read on here otherwise is people saying that his Strava treadmill uploads are "fraud"...well, no, they're not fraud but I agree he couldn't run some of those times on a track. And that his coaching for a lot of people was cookie-cutter and not personalized. Clearly they should be jailed for such crimes against humanity (sarcasm-alert).
Is the Chatbot stuff "pro-David"? Like I said, I'm not reading it. It's stupid regardless.
Not a troll. Just don't have an irrational hatred for the Roches. Yes, a lot of the stuff on this thread is irrational. The Roches might be a little full of themselves, sure. But all I've read on here otherwise is people saying that his Strava treadmill uploads are "fraud"...well, no, they're not fraud but I agree he couldn't run some of those times on a track. And that his coaching for a lot of people was cookie-cutter and not personalized. Clearly they should be jailed for such crimes against humanity (sarcasm-alert).
those treadmill workouts are 100% fraudulent. He doesn't upload or track the workout with his treadmill, he does so with his watch, which is very innacurate
Is the Chatbot stuff "pro-David"? Like I said, I'm not reading it. It's stupid regardless.
Not a troll. Just don't have an irrational hatred for the Roches. Yes, a lot of the stuff on this thread is irrational. The Roches might be a little full of themselves, sure. But all I've read on here otherwise is people saying that his Strava treadmill uploads are "fraud"...well, no, they're not fraud but I agree he couldn't run some of those times on a track. And that his coaching for a lot of people was cookie-cutter and not personalized. Clearly they should be jailed for such crimes against humanity (sarcasm-alert).
those treadmill workouts are 100% fraudulent. He doesn't upload or track the workout with his treadmill, he does so with his watch, which is very innacurate
Newsflash: that's not "fraud." Give it a rest. Already discussed on this thread a long time ago that he acknowledged the inaccuracy of his treadmill.
I will, though, troll you a bit: dude, you're showing your loser-living-in-a-basement-ness with your inability to spell simple words. Maybe spend a little more time on, umm, education and getting outside than irrationally waging jihad against the Roches.
those treadmill workouts are 100% fraudulent. He doesn't upload or track the workout with his treadmill, he does so with his watch, which is very innacurate
Newsflash: that's not "fraud." Give it a rest. Already discussed on this thread a long time ago that he acknowledged the inaccuracy of his treadmill.
I will, though, troll you a bit: dude, you're showing your loser-living-in-a-basement-ness with your inability to spell simple words. Maybe spend a little more time on, umm, education and getting outside than irrationally waging jihad against the Roches.
you used the word fraud, tool, so I was just going along with that.
No, he didn't say that. He mentioned on his podcast about how his treadmill might be perfectly accurate, but then back tracked on that.
those treadmill workouts are 100% fraudulent. He doesn't upload or track the workout with his treadmill, he does so with his watch, which is very innacurate
Newsflash: that's not "fraud." Give it a rest. Already discussed on this thread a long time ago that he acknowledged the inaccuracy of his treadmill.
I will, though, troll you a bit: dude, you're showing your loser-living-in-a-basement-ness with your inability to spell simple words. Maybe spend a little more time on, umm, education and getting outside than irrationally waging jihad against the Roches.
He has posted, time and time again, treadmill workouts that he is incapable of.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.