Supreme Court ends affirmation action

I just provided a few of many papers that have shown the white candidate will get an interview while the black candidate is far less likely to even get a phone call.

There are many other papers that show that people tend to hire people who look like them, which also hugely favors white people.

In many cases, then, black people don't even get a chance to demonstrate their merit.

But I know you don't care. You've posted time after time that "black people are dumber/have lower IQs" or whatever other racist crap you spew.

(God, I'm sorry I am corresponding with a known racist. Please forgive me.)

Is this why many cis hetero white men are complaining about "discrimination" these days?

It's amazing you don't see the irony in your post.

I never said that. Average IQ can explain group differences but obviously each person is an individual

Just occurred to me that in the coming year we might be seeing somewhat fewer of the heart-warming stories about kids who get into all eight Ivies.

1) What peer-review did that video go through?

2) As the peer-reviewed studies show, you can send out the exact same resume to the same employer for the same job. The one with a "white name" gets an interview. The one with the "black name" is significantly less likely to.

3) Then you can repeat that study making the white-named resume slightly worse, by deleting some qualifications. It is STILL more likely to get the interview.

Your click-bait video, making money by affirming the victimhood status of entitled white people, is not going to disprove those studies.

If you watched the video, every comment is cited from peer-reviewed studies.

Is there some way in which one can report a post as literally insane?

It makes as much sense to say that you want fewer whites and Asians in college. Yet the number of whites and Asians in colleges for the last several decades has been suppressed due to so-called "Affirmative Action" that favors some applicants due to their races and disfavors some applicants due to their races - in other words "racial discrimination."

Exactly.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid036QNeUvjA3zk9yuxX6yBjP8kyad5i3RVq6A7yxLYvXWz8Kh4kwRZMJ3VHuYoHzLvl&id=541838932&mibextid=ZbWKwL

Affirmative action in the United States consists of government-mandated, government-approved, and voluntary private programs granting special consideration to historically excluded groups, specifically racial minorities or women. The programs tended to focus on access to education and employment.

I read this article. If he refers to the highly qualified legacy students as "mediocre", I wonder what he'd use to describe the 'diversity' students with 1300-1400s SAT.

But he thinks every group has the same innate capabilities so of course he'll never say this

Chief Justice John Roberts himself, who ruled that affirmative action violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. The 14th Amendment was, of course, written explicitly to revoke the racism practiced by whites against Blacks through their slaver’s Constitution, but Roberts doesn’t care about all that. His opinion attempts to capture the 14th Amendment and redeploy it to justify a white version of “color blindness” that just so happens to lock in a status quo that benefits whites.