jesseriley wrote:
“Stop Bernie or Bust”
Yeah, that worked in 2016
If Bernie wins great. But polls suggest that 82% of Biden’s backers will support whichever Dem wins the nomination, for Bernie backers that percentage is only 53%. Little more than half.
That’s what we’re talking about. If you don’t get your first pick do not hand Trump another four year and a 7-2 conservative Supreme Court.
Democrats are fairies
single wing wrote:
This is Biden's third campaign for President.
It is his most successful.
He finished fourth in Iowa with 15% of the vote. That beat his best previous finish by one place and 14% of the vote.
He has never previously made it to New Hampshire so tonight will be his best finish there.
But I'm sure he is the most electable.
You do understand the difference between head to head with Trump versus the primaries?
You do understand that a handful of states will decide the election? You have looked at the demographics of those battleground states and which policies poll popular and unpopular?
If Biden isn’t nominated that’s fine, he hasn’t earned it. But the fact remains he still polls best against Trump and his policies poll more popular than Sanders or Warrens in those particular states.
Ciro wrote:
single wing wrote:
This is Biden's third campaign for President.
It is his most successful.
He finished fourth in Iowa with 15% of the vote. That beat his best previous finish by one place and 14% of the vote.
He has never previously made it to New Hampshire so tonight will be his best finish there.
But I'm sure he is the most electable.
You do understand the difference between head to head with Trump versus the primaries?
You do understand that a handful of states will decide the election? You have looked at the demographics of those battleground states and which policies poll popular and unpopular?
If Biden isn’t nominated that’s fine, he hasn’t earned it. But the fact remains he still polls best against Trump and his policies poll more popular than Sanders or Warrens in those particular states.
Sure. The way to find a candidate who is most electable is surely to find a guy who has run a bunch of pathetic losing election campaigns...I'm sure it doesn't say anything about his ability to organize, or inspire, or generate enthusiasm. I'm sure none of that is at all important in the general.
single wing wrote:
Ciro wrote:
You do understand the difference between head to head with Trump versus the primaries?
You do understand that a handful of states will decide the election? You have looked at the demographics of those battleground states and which policies poll popular and unpopular?
If Biden isn’t nominated that’s fine, he hasn’t earned it. But the fact remains he still polls best against Trump and his policies poll more popular than Sanders or Warrens in those particular states.
Sure. The way to find a candidate who is most electable is surely to find a guy who has run a bunch of pathetic losing election campaigns...I'm sure it doesn't say anything about his ability to organize, or inspire, or generate enthusiasm. I'm sure none of that is at all important in the general.
You’re restricted and limited to sound bytes, got it.
I’ll support whichever Dem gets the nomination. Good luck.
Ciro wrote:
single wing wrote:
Sure. The way to find a candidate who is most electable is surely to find a guy who has run a bunch of pathetic losing election campaigns...I'm sure it doesn't say anything about his ability to organize, or inspire, or generate enthusiasm. I'm sure none of that is at all important in the general.
You’re restricted and limited to sound bytes, got it.
I’ll support whichever Dem gets the nomination. Good luck.
Sure, when trying to make predictions about electability, results or past elections are all just soundbytes instead of data.
Good luck to you getting through life.
News flash: some politicians hire their primary opponents & adopt compromise platforms to keep the party together.
Not HRC, though.
Biden toast; Sanders versus Buttigieg, perhaps Bloomberg if a brokered convention.
jesseriley wrote:
News flash: some politicians hire their primary opponents & adopt compromise platforms to keep the party together.
Not HRC, though.
Have I ever expressed support for HRC? Nor do I necessarily disagree with you.
I’m talking about the present and supporting whoever gets the nomination, you in?
single wing wrote:
Ciro wrote:
You’re restricted and limited to sound bytes, got it.
I’ll support whichever Dem gets the nomination. Good luck.
Sure, when trying to make predictions about electability, results or past elections are all just soundbytes instead of data.
Good luck to you getting through life.
Respectfully you haven’t produced an ounce of data, I have.
Good luck.
Sally Vix wrote:
Ciro wrote:
We know, that’s why the put of jobs created during Obama’s time backfired spectacularly ?
Do you not understand that I got the part of Obama's jobs being low-paying and part-time from a DIFFERENT SOURCE??? How many times must I say that. I never read the linked articles and don't care what they say.
That’s the problem with you ignorant Republican low information voters. You stick your fingers in your ears and refuse to listen to the truth. If it doesn’t fit your Fox News Right Wing narrative...you have no interest in hearing it.
Calling it now, Democratic nominee will be Buttigieg.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Calling it now, Democratic nominee will be Buttigieg.
How do you feel about him as a candidate?
Like him, from what I know.
Trollminator wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Quid Pro Joe left NH to campaign in South Carolina.
It's over. He'll drop out soon.
Good thing you’re not known for your accurate predictive ability.
Way better than the ?pole's prediction record. The NH primary is showing 5th place Quid Pro Joe with 29% reporting.
I stand by my prediction. Quid Pro Joe is toast, his campaign is on life support.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Like him, from what I know.
Is there any Dem candidate you’d vote for in a head to head versus Trump?
How’s life with you in Boise?
I don’t have anything against Tim Kaine, but we’d lose again with him as VP.
jesseriley wrote:
I don’t have anything against Tim Kaine, but we’d lose again with him as VP.
Sure, but I don’t follow your overall point, or is that it?
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Biden toast; Sanders versus Buttigieg, perhaps Bloomberg if a brokered convention.
Could be.
In other news and this is very bad for the dems:
NBC News exit polls show that voters ages 18 to 29 made up only 11 percent of the New Hampshire Democrat primary electorate on Tuesday, far below the 19 percent of 18 to 29-year-olds who voted in the Democrat primary in 2016.
Ciro wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Like him, from what I know.
Is there any Dem candidate you’d vote for in a head to head versus Trump?
How’s life with you in Boise?
Sure. There are a lot of things I do not like about Trump: budget, market cheer leading, military expenditures, environmental cuts....
Good, looking like spring now. Mornings still chilly around 30s. Nice clear afternoons around 45.