Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

The Burghh wrote:

Ciro wrote:

The Forbes article is about Trump and shows that many of the jobs created during his tenure have been part time and low paying.

So you are saying Sally is full of sh*t. Making up things when he can’t explain the truth.

Correct, even when replying to an article that shows most of the jobs created by Trump fall into that category, he still will deny and deflect.

He really should have read the articles first.

Trollminator wrote:

Conundrum wrote:

Many Dems are idealists. But they lose site of the real danger of 4 more years of Trump.

I know a number of smart successful Republicans who are embarrassed by Trump. They won't vote trump but will if Bernie or Elizabeth are running.

All wealthy Rs will vote for trump, he has really looked out for them. There are also many Rs who will vote for him because they are scared to death of the communist/socialist Dems, deep state, etc. The rest are just trumpanzees like trigged and Sally.

I am no Trumpanzee - I will vote for Trump for the following reasons ...

The most consequential and long-lasting effects that he will have on the country are his Supreme Court nominees. If he can make the court 7-2 in favor of conservatives that will survive for 30 to 35 years.

I don't like any of the Democratic candidates. Warren and Bernie are outright socialists. Mayor Pete is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Not sure what to think of Bloomberg --- what he said in that audio of black communities will come back to haunt him. Joe Biden, not sure what to think of him. He seems to be losing it more and more each day now.

I want Trump to win just to stick it to the Dems in the Congress. What they have done is really terrible. To pursue Trump's removal for 3-plus years is beyond the pale. Just sad what the Democratic party has become.

Ciro wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Your party wants socialism, that's how they have lost the moderate voters.

Bullish!t from you once again. Bernie Sanders and maybe Elizabeth Warren want a form of democratic socialism similar to what’s practiced with success in Scandinavia. There is a world of difference between that and just socialism.

Again that’s one or two Democratic candidates. People like Biden, Klobuchar and Buttigieg don’t even advocate democratic socialism.

Warren is a capitalist.

The position of the candidate doesn't matter, though, the Republicans are going to try to label democrats as socialists who are out to destroy America, regardless of who the nominee is. People like agip are just priming the pump for them, though.

I'm sure most of you haven't noticed, but capitalism as practiced in America is not working very well. Republicans act like the absence of any government regulation is capitalism, but capitalism does not work with the amount of market concentration that has accumulated in America. This is not some sort of normal or natural state, it is one that has very deliberately been pursued by the elites in our society.

Racket wrote:

Ciro wrote:

Agree, idealists to a fault, severely lacking in pragmatism.

Trump will be out of control if he gets a second term, with no concern regarding reelection and without anyone in the GOP prepared to hold him accountable.

Trump will very likely get to replace another liberal Supreme Court judge with a conservative one. Trump will of course continue filling the courts with conservatives. The impact will be felt for decades.

No liberal of any hue should be “or bust” about their favorite candidate. Sometimes in life you have to be practical and pick the lesser of two evils.

Dreamers and their families will appreciate it, much more than idealist sound-bytes are necessary from the left.

lol who said it better, Republicans in 2016 or Democrats in 2020.

Dreamers in 2020 said it best. I’m sure many in the hispanic population are watching to see if the Bernie or bust crew sell them out once again.

Ciro wrote:

The Burghh wrote:

So you are saying Sally is full of sh*t. Making up things when he can’t explain the truth.

Correct, even when replying to an article that shows most of the jobs created by Trump fall into that category, he still will deny and deflect.

He really should have read the articles first.

I never replied to that article or articles. I never even read those articles. My information I got from a different source. You really are going to punish me for not reading an article I never even pretended to read? Next time please try to be a bit more circumspect when bashing me.

agip wrote:

what I want is the democrats to take some responsibility and become a governing party, as in the days of Bill Clinton and Obama. People who picked a few winnable battles and compromised to get the win but not lose their soul.

I have very little tolerance for bernie or bust people - who don't believe the Dem party should ever reach out to the middle. whp think you just try to revolutionalize a large portion of the US economy and don't settle.

This is the Joe Biden fantasy. There is nobody to compromise with.

Bill Clinton lost his soul (if he every had one) with welfare reform and the crime bill. Not sure exactly what he got in return.

We did cut military spending, which was good.

There isn't a candidate out there who has the will to state the clear fact that we need to cut military spending by 50%.

single wing wrote:

Ciro wrote:

Bullish!t from you once again. Bernie Sanders and maybe Elizabeth Warren want a form of democratic socialism similar to what’s practiced with success in Scandinavia. There is a world of difference between that and just socialism.

Again that’s one or two Democratic candidates. People like Biden, Klobuchar and Buttigieg don’t even advocate democratic socialism.

Warren is a capitalist.

.

I stopped right there. I was giggling too much! Nice one!

I agree that’s why I and maybe Warren. To address the posters view.

It will be easy for Trump to label Sanders as a socialist in Iowa, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin & Pennsylvania. Biden for example would be a much more difficult sell and he knows it.

Agip isn’t priming the pump for anyone, he’s a guy posting his opinions on a running form. The “or bust” crew are the biggest asset the GOP have.

Sally Vix wrote:

Ciro wrote:

Correct, even when replying to an article that shows most of the jobs created by Trump fall into that category, he still will deny and deflect.

He really should have read the articles first.

I never replied to that article or articles. I never even read those articles. My information I got from a different source. You really are going to punish me for not reading an article I never even pretended to read? Next time please try to be a bit more circumspect when bashing me.

We know, that’s why the put of jobs created during Obama’s time backfired spectacularly ?

Trump doesn't have to "label" Bernie as a socialist. Bernie is a self-avowed socialist. Was that easy? No need to question who he is . He calls himself a socialist. That will fly over swimmingly in middle America.

Ciro wrote:

I agree that’s why I and maybe Warren. To address the posters view.

It will be easy for Trump to label Sanders as a socialist in Iowa, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin & Pennsylvania. Biden for example would be a much more difficult sell and he knows it.

Agip isn’t priming the pump for anyone, he’s a guy posting his opinions on a running form. The “or bust” crew are the biggest asset the GOP have.

Sure, of course Joe Biden will be more moderate and thus more electable in a state like Iowa.

Whoops, he came in fourth. Oh well, I'm sure it won't stop you from arguing that.

There is no evidence supporting the idea that Biden is more electable. It is just a mirror you hold up to yourself.

Ciro wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

I never replied to that article or articles. I never even read those articles. My information I got from a different source. You really are going to punish me for not reading an article I never even pretended to read? Next time please try to be a bit more circumspect when bashing me.

We know, that’s why the put of jobs created during Obama’s time backfired spectacularly ?

Do you not understand that I got the part of Obama's jobs being low-paying and part-time from a DIFFERENT SOURCE??? How many times must I say that. I never read the linked articles and don't care what they say.

Sally Vix wrote:

Ciro wrote:

I agree that’s why I and maybe Warren. To address the posters view.

It will be easy for Trump to label Sanders as a socialist in Iowa, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin & Pennsylvania. Biden for example would be a much more difficult sell and he knows it.

Agip isn’t priming the pump for anyone, he’s a guy posting his opinions on a running form. The “or bust” crew are the biggest asset the GOP have.

Trump doesn't have to "label" Bernie as a socialist. Bernie is a self-avowed socialist. Was that easy? No need to question who he is . He calls himself a socialist. That will fly over swimmingly in middle America.

Yes we are making the same point. Although I think Bernie describes himself a Democratic socialist more along the lines of Scandinavia than just a simple socialist.

single wing wrote:

Ciro wrote:

I agree that’s why I and maybe Warren. To address the posters view.

It will be easy for Trump to label Sanders as a socialist in Iowa, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin & Pennsylvania. Biden for example would be a much more difficult sell and he knows it.

Agip isn’t priming the pump for anyone, he’s a guy posting his opinions on a running form. The “or bust” crew are the biggest asset the GOP have.

Sure, of course Joe Biden will be more moderate and thus more electable in a state like Iowa.

Whoops, he came in fourth. Oh well, I'm sure it won't stop you from arguing that.

There is no evidence supporting the idea that Biden is more electable. It is just a mirror you hold up to yourself.

He came forth out of Democrat options, he polls stronger head to head in the more the states I listed than anyone else. He wouldn’t even be my first choice.

This is Biden's third campaign for President.

It is his most successful.

He finished fourth in Iowa with 15% of the vote. That beat his best previous finish by one place and 14% of the vote.

He has never previously made it to New Hampshire so tonight will be his best finish there.

But I'm sure he is the most electable.

Liking trump because he sticks it to the libs means you are a typical trumpanzee. I don’t even know why you try to deny you are one, just own it. No potus has trashed the constitution and reputation of the country as much as your boy. Today is just another one of hundreds of examples - he has made the DOJ an extension of his mob activity. There is zero objectivity and separation. There is no other way to look at it. When he didn’t like the recommended sentence for Stone he simply told Barr to fix it. Supporting someone like this makes you a traitor and someone with zero integrity. I’ll wait for your usual deflection. You won’t address the point on Barr because you are a trumpanzee, which means you support trump at all costs.

“Stop Bernie or Bust”

Yeah, that worked in 2016

single wing wrote:

Ciro wrote:

I agree that’s why I and maybe Warren. To address the posters view.

It will be easy for Trump to label Sanders as a socialist in Iowa, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin & Pennsylvania. Biden for example would be a much more difficult sell and he knows it.

Agip isn’t priming the pump for anyone, he’s a guy posting his opinions on a running form. The “or bust” crew are the biggest asset the GOP have.

Sure, of course Joe Biden will be more moderate and thus more electable in a state like Iowa.

Whoops, he came in fourth. Oh well, I'm sure it won't stop you from arguing that.

There is no evidence supporting the idea that Biden is more electable. It is just a mirror you hold up to yourself.

I’ll leave this here for you to dissect. It isn’t absolute prove but it is evidence to suggest that Biden might be the strongest candidate to win the battleground states that are up for grabs in a head to head with Trump.

Playing it smug and asking for evidence doesn’t suit you when you’ve offered nothing yourself. Again Biden wouldn’t be my first pick but there’s a reason Trump impeached himself trying to undermine Biden’s campaign.

Sally Vix wrote:

Ciro wrote:

We know, that’s why the put of jobs created during Obama’s time backfired spectacularly ?

Do you not understand that I got the part of Obama's jobs being low-paying and part-time from a DIFFERENT SOURCE??? How many times must I say that. I never read the linked articles and don't care what they say.

You don’t read, period.