Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

5 years does go quickly, sally.

As the CIA will remind you in Guantanamo.

Sally Vix wrote:

Communist Trump wrote:

Sally, please don't whine because Trump is forever impeached, and received 48 conviction votes in the Senate. These are FACTS.

The majority of Senators declared him not guilty. THOSE are the facts, Jack.

true

but

the number of Americans represented by the senators voting guilty...was far larger than the number of Americans represented by the senators voting not guilty.

One more example of minority rule. This will not end well.

agip wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

The majority of Senators declared him not guilty. THOSE are the facts, Jack.

true

but

the number of Americans represented by the senators voting guilty...was far larger than the number of Americans represented by the senators voting not guilty.

One more example of minority rule. This will not end well.

Are we really going back to the Electoral College and how some senators represent much more populous states than others? Are we really going to that again? The US Constitution has lasted for 140 years. It has worked beautifully. You Liberals want to change that SIMPLY because the last few elections have not allowed your candidate to win. You want to change it MERELY because you have not been winning. You have no idea why the Electoral College is beautiful. You need to go back and read why the Electoral College is the greatest thing ever. Put down your political hat - and appreciate the Electoral College.

agip wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

The majority of Senators declared him not guilty. THOSE are the facts, Jack.

true

but

the number of Americans represented by the senators voting guilty...was far larger than the number of Americans represented by the senators voting not guilty.

One more example of minority rule. This will not end well.

Very e e cummings. Well done.

agip wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

The majority of Senators declared him not guilty. THOSE are the facts, Jack.

true

but

the number of Americans represented by the senators voting guilty...was far larger than the number of Americans represented by the senators voting not guilty.

One more example of minority rule. This will not end well.

Please show me other examples of "minority rule." There are none. This is not an example of "minority rule." This is an example of providing the minority of some say in the electoral process. Again, please provide me of any examples of "minority rule." Thanks in advance!

Sally Vix wrote:

agip wrote:

true

but

the number of Americans represented by the senators voting guilty...was far larger than the number of Americans represented by the senators voting not guilty.

One more example of minority rule. This will not end well.

Please show me other examples of "minority rule." There are none. This is not an example of "minority rule." This is an example of providing the minority of some say in the electoral process. Again, please provide me of any examples of "minority rule." Thanks in advance!

I'm sure I'm walking into some kind of an attempted trap here, but clearly you must know that both Trump and Bush2 won elections despite more people voting for their opponents.

ergo, minority rule.

Mapleton Runner wrote:

I’m voting for Biden in a few weeks. If you guys vote Sanders as the nominee, the consequences are on you.

I suggest you do some research on Sanders’ position.

LOL yeah sure we will feel responsible for your lack of imagination and urgency

jesseriley wrote:

I’m not a Romney supporter, but trump questioning his faith today at the PRAYER breakfast was so inappropriate, it’s laughable.

He should not be questioning anyone's faith, ever

The Burgh wrote:

Republicans are evil to the core. Time to take the gloves off.

Trump supporters intentionally swarmed the Iowa Caucus phone lines to delay the results

http://va.topbuzz.com/s/mUkQyf

I told my wife yesterday that the Repubs probably had something to do with the problems in Iowa.

There was never a question that trump & co (incld putin) would stoop to another layer of unethical behavior and corruption

Trollminator wrote:

The Burgh wrote:

Republicans are evil to the core. Time to take the gloves off.

Trump supporters intentionally swarmed the Iowa Caucus phone lines to delay the results

http://va.topbuzz.com/s/mUkQyf

I told my wife yesterday that the Repubs probably had something to do with the problems in Iowa.

There was never a question that trump & co (incld putin) would stoop to another layer of unethical behavior and corruption

and honor-free Repubs are organizing to go vote for Bernie in the NC Dem primary.

Absolutely freakishlly bad americans.

Sally Vix wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

Correct. I agree it's an individual right, but lets not pretend it can't have massive negative consequences and that those who don't vote don't have any accountability.

So, if people who vote differently than how you THINK they should vote it will have massive negative consequences? So you are the determiner of how people should vote and if they don't vote how you think they should vote they are idiots? You decide how people should vote?

Did I say they are wrong? I'm saying that in 2016, people who thought trump was corrupt and unfit, but proceeded to vote for Jill or simply didn't vote because they didn't like Hillary are idiots. That is my opinion. They can do whatever they want but they are partly responsible for the outcome - that should be obvious, even for a math/computer science genius like you.

Sally Vix wrote:

agip wrote:

true

but

the number of Americans represented by the senators voting guilty...was far larger than the number of Americans represented by the senators voting not guilty.

One more example of minority rule. This will not end well.

[a bunch of stupid sh!t and then this gem] - "The US Constitution has lasted for 140 years."

So, you believe the Constitution was written in 1880? That is massively embarrassing. Why do you post at all? You are wrong every single time about something. Why should anyone listen to a thing you say?

agip wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Please show me other examples of "minority rule." There are none. This is not an example of "minority rule." This is an example of providing the minority of some say in the electoral process. Again, please provide me of any examples of "minority rule." Thanks in advance!

I'm sure I'm walking into some kind of an attempted trap here, but clearly you must know that both Trump and Bush2 won elections despite more people voting for their opponents.

ergo, minority rule.

That is not minority rule. If minority rule would apply, the one winning the fewest votes would have won. That is not what happened. The US Constitution provides for an Electoral College whereby each state is allowed a specific number of electoral votes. The one who wins the most electoral votes wins. It is not a democracy.

Smorbun wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

[a bunch of stupid sh!t and then this gem] - "The US Constitution has lasted for 140 years."

So, you believe the Constitution was written in 1880? That is massively embarrassing. Why do you post at all? You are wrong every single time about something. Why should anyone listen to a thing you say?

240 years loser.

Mapleton Runner wrote:

L L wrote:

I've said that I prefer Biden over Sanders.

But I prefer Sanders way over Trump.

Now I have researched Sanders' positions and wonder what consequences you are talking about.

He may die soon or have more heart attacks.

He can only pass what Congress votes on.

The executive orders are limited.

He's not going to make obnoxious, divisive tweets.

He'll push hard for healthcare change.

He will push for a tax code that pays for things.

Awesome. Vote for him. I’m not.

choose not to exercise your right but don't complain later

Trollminator wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

So, if people who vote differently than how you THINK they should vote it will have massive negative consequences? So you are the determiner of how people should vote and if they don't vote how you think they should vote they are idiots? You decide how people should vote?

Did I say they are wrong? I'm saying that in 2016, people who thought trump was corrupt and unfit, but proceeded to vote for Jill or simply didn't vote because they didn't like Hillary are idiots. That is my opinion. They can do whatever they want but they are partly responsible for the outcome - that should be obvious, even for a math/computer science genius like you.

You should not even mockingly call Sally a "genius." He will believe it. He's a raging idiot as we all are aware.

Mapleton Runner wrote:

Awesome. Vote for him. I’m not.

I'm not voting for Bernie in the primary either. But I would in the general.

But you still haven't explained the "consequences" based on his positions.

Unless you mean that he isn't electable.

And that may be fair or not. We've seen a number of moderates not get elected.

If you mean the consequences of him as president, please explain.

Sally Vix wrote:

Smorbun wrote:

So, you believe the Constitution was written in 1880? That is massively embarrassing. Why do you post at all? You are wrong every single time about something. Why should anyone listen to a thing you say?

240 years loser.

Well, not quite 240, but I would have let it go if you had written that. You wrote "140." You dumb this whole thread down.

Sally Vix wrote:

agip wrote:

I'm sure I'm walking into some kind of an attempted trap here, but clearly you must know that both Trump and Bush2 won elections despite more people voting for their opponents.

ergo, minority rule.

That is not minority rule. If minority rule would apply, the one winning the fewest votes would have won. That is not what happened. The US Constitution provides for an Electoral College whereby each state is allowed a specific number of electoral votes. The one who wins the most electoral votes wins. It is not a democracy.

FFS

Ok I will again go into my ' do not read Sally's posts anymore' mode.

thanks for reminding me of how empty your thinking is.