Don’t say delete, sally, unless you mean it.
Don’t say delete, sally, unless you mean it.
Fat hurts wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Seriously , FAt Hurts? He was the co-founder of the biggest tech company ever. He was not a computer science expert? Really?
He founded a computer company, not a computer science company. Again, you don't know what computer science is.
Computer science is as much about computers as astronomy is about telescopes.
So Apple or Microsoft have nothing to do with computer science? Do you have any idea how stupid you sound?
Sally you dumb@ss, Jobs was mostly a marketer/salesman/supervisor.
Trollminator wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
I support Racket's right to vote for third party or not at all. In a democracy, that's a legitimate choice (except in Brazil).
But I think in the end, he will vote for the Democratic nominee.
This feeds directly into the old Repub strategy of limiting turnout... they fare well when that happens.
Also, it boils down to your values. IMO, trump has been the most damaging thing in government since the super PACs were allowed. I will therefore use my vote in the most strategic manner to help him lose. Pretty simple.
"Also, it boils down to your values. IMO, "hillary" has been the most damaging thing in government since the super PACs were allowed. I will therefore use my vote in the most strategic manner to help her lose. Pretty simple." - Republicans, circa 2016.
This should be a great learning opportunity. Perhaps you now see how easy it is to fall into a "win at all costs" mindset. I guess that's fine if you think Trump is literally the lowest the bar can go and anyone else is better. Seems disingenuous to me though
jesseriley wrote:
Always the same tagline: “I’m just a businessman!”
excellent point
Racket wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
This feeds directly into the old Repub strategy of limiting turnout... they fare well when that happens.
Also, it boils down to your values. IMO, trump has been the most damaging thing in government since the super PACs were allowed. I will therefore use my vote in the most strategic manner to help him lose. Pretty simple.
"Also, it boils down to your values. IMO, "hillary" has been the most damaging thing in government since the super PACs were allowed. I will therefore use my vote in the most strategic manner to help her lose. Pretty simple." - Republicans, circa 2016.
This should be a great learning opportunity. Perhaps you now see how easy it is to fall into a "win at all costs" mindset. I guess that's fine if you think Trump is literally the lowest the bar can go and anyone else is better. Seems disingenuous to me though
I think trump is literally the lowest the bar can go and anyone else in the current field is light years better.
BS! Trump brags about murder, sexual assault, and treason. His own words.
Trollminator wrote:
That is pretty weak. You have a vote and you don't want to use it to for what you believe is right.
I have a vote and I'll use it for the person I think will be best for the nation. If it's a third party candidate then I sure as hell won't hesitate. Oh an by the way you might wanna check Bernie's party affiliation before you accuse Democrats of stepping out of line because last I checked Bernie's only been a Democrat twice in his life, now and once in 2016.
If trump hasn’t gone low enough, just wait awhile.
Trollminator wrote:
I think trump is literally the lowest the bar can go and anyone else in the current field is light years better.
I think everyone in the field would be an improvement except for Bernie so we're really not that different.
Obvious trumpanzee
Sally Vix wrote:
How can the health care cost be cut in half? Are we in Fantasyland?
Gutting administrative costs. Healthcare middlemen (those are involved with creating "billing") and drug companies (those involved with creating "paperwork" and billing).
Racket wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
I think trump is literally the lowest the bar can go and anyone else in the current field is light years better.
I think everyone in the field would be an improvement except for Bernie so we're really not that different.
Even that baby McKinsey hack who's tenure as mayor of a college town somehow qualifies him would be better than Trump (not that he has a chance anyways)
Mapleton Runner wrote:
Swing Voter wrote:
Here is a simple math version for you.
Trump gets 100 votes
Bernie gets 99 votes became Racket refused to vote for him or Trump.
Wrong. It would 98 since I would vote for either one as well.
What????
Trump gets 100 votes
Bernie gets 99 votes because Racket refused to vote for him or Trump.
Racket votes for Bernie.
New result is ...
Trump gets 100 votes
Bernie gets 100 votes
This is called addition, not subtraction.
We need some better trumper trolls. These guys aren’t even a challenge.
Racket wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
That is pretty weak. You have a vote and you don't want to use it to for what you believe is right.
I have a vote and I'll use it for the person I think will be best for the nation. If it's a third party candidate then I sure as hell won't hesitate. Oh an by the way you might wanna check Bernie's party affiliation before you accuse Democrats of stepping out of line because last I checked Bernie's only been a Democrat twice in his life, now and once in 2016.
Comes back to your sense of urgency. In the pre-Trump era, I would vote for the one I thought was best for the country, recognizing and tolerating the fact that a candidate I might not like could be elected. For this election, just like in 2016, I will vote for the one who has the best chance to beat him, because I believe he's the worst thing that's happened to the WH and the sooner he's gone the better. I will go back to voting for the one I think is best once this plague is gone.
Sally Vix wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
He founded a computer company, not a computer science company. Again, you don't know what computer science is.
Computer science is as much about computers as astronomy is about telescopes.
So Apple or Microsoft have nothing to do with computer science? Do you have any idea how stupid you sound?
I sound like someone who knows what computer science is. You sound like Sally.
Trollminator wrote:
Racket wrote:
I have a vote and I'll use it for the person I think will be best for the nation. If it's a third party candidate then I sure as hell won't hesitate. Oh an by the way you might wanna check Bernie's party affiliation before you accuse Democrats of stepping out of line because last I checked Bernie's only been a Democrat twice in his life, now and once in 2016.
Comes back to your sense of urgency. In the pre-Trump era, I would vote for the one I thought was best for the country, recognizing and tolerating the fact that a candidate I might not like could be elected. For this election, just like in 2016, I will vote for the one who has the best chance to beat him, because I believe he's the worst thing that's happened to the WH and the sooner he's gone the better. I will go back to voting for the one I think is best once this plague is gone.
Oh man that is the slipperiest of slopes and literally, LITERALLY, how we ended up with Trump in the first place but OK
Trump has the habit of inadvertently speaking out his intentions under the guise of what he sees coming.
Trump raises possibility he will be impeached again
Meaning Trump KNOWS he will be impeached again because he intends to continue breaking laws.
At his noontime rally, Trump said: "Because if they find that I happen to walk across the street and maybe go against the light or something, let’s impeach him. So we’ll probably have to do it again."
"Go against the light" in Trumpspeak means breaking the law.