Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Sally Vix wrote:

Well, ok then wrote:

Suppose there were some policy implemented that cut the average American's healthcare cost in half, thus putting in line with the rest of the world. What effect would that have on the economy?

Seriously? it would devastate the economy. If everyone's healthcare cost was cut in half, who is paying for that? Santa Claus? We Americans would be paying for that and it would cost TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS. Do you not understand how stuff like that works?

What I'm asking is what would happen if the gross cost of healthcare were cut in half, ignoring for the purpose of discussion how this might happen.

Sally Vix wrote:

You really posted ....

^ Troll

agip wrote:

Racket wrote:

Not sure what part of "literally not true" and "however you want to define 'is'" you don't understand but I'll assume that like 95% of the people on this thread you're just severely on the spectrum.

Isn't that right jesse!

in a democracy not voting is unacceptable. It's our responsibility to choose our leaders.

Fair enough. I accept the premise and choose to vote third party.

Well, ok then wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Seriously? it would devastate the economy. If everyone's healthcare cost was cut in half, who is paying for that? Santa Claus? We Americans would be paying for that and it would cost TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS. Do you not understand how stuff like that works?

What I'm asking is what would happen if the gross cost of healthcare were cut in half, ignoring for the purpose of discussion how this might happen.

How can the health care cost be cut in half? Are we in Fantasyland?

Racket wrote:

agip wrote:

in a democracy not voting is unacceptable. It's our responsibility to choose our leaders.

Fair enough. I accept the premise and choose to vote third party.

No, you should figure out who you hate the least of the major party candidates. If it's an exact tie, then vote for the 3rd party candidate.

Sally Vix wrote:

nothing better wrote:

Trump acquitted!!!!

Suck on that, you disgusting piece of trash.

You are far from the Truth.

You are an absolute disgrace!!!

If you don't think that Steve Jobs was an expert in computer science, then YOU, Fat Hurts, did not go to college! Besides the surfeit of grammatical errors you continue to make, you need to "woke" to the fact that Steve Jobs was a computer science expert.

I'm sure you are just trolling, but you obviously don't know what computer science is.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

Racket wrote:

Fair enough. I accept the premise and choose to vote third party.

No, you should figure out who you hate the least of the major party candidates. If it's an exact tie, then vote for the 3rd party candidate.

Sad that the election has become voting for the candidate we hate the least.

Fat hurts wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

If you don't think that Steve Jobs was an expert in computer science, then YOU, Fat Hurts, did not go to college! Besides the surfeit of grammatical errors you continue to make, you need to "woke" to the fact that Steve Jobs was a computer science expert.

I'm sure you are just trolling, but you obviously don't know what computer science is.

Was Steve Jobs an expert in computer science or was he not? I say he was and you say he was not? Fair?

There are several parties for trump refugees. More every day!

Swing Voter wrote:

Racket wrote:

Well since that's literally not true, it basically comes down to however you want to define "is," and since we can move that definition back and forth on a continuum to suit almost any legitimate ethical framework you can conceive of, I see no reason to even bother arguing it except to point out that a more acceptable action, if one found both candidates equally appalling and bad for the country, would be to not vote at all, so I'll let you chew on that for a while.

Here is a simple math version for you.

Trump gets 100 votes

Bernie gets 99 votes became Racket refused to vote for him or Trump.

Wrong. It would 98 since I would vote for either one as well.

Sally Vix wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

I'm sure you are just trolling, but you obviously don't know what computer science is.

Was Steve Jobs an expert in computer science or was he not? I say he was and you say he was not? Fair?

The co-founder of the perhaps the biggest computer company EVER was not adept at computer science? That is what you are saying?

Racket wrote:

agip wrote:

in a democracy not voting is unacceptable. It's our responsibility to choose our leaders.

Fair enough. I accept the premise and choose to vote third party.

FFS

listen to yourself equating sanders and trump. Write that down, put it in your calendar for Feb 6, 2030. You will be ashamed.

agip wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Who are these swing voters?

Is there one person in America who hasn't made up his or her mind about which way they will vote in the general election?

well, racket for one.

hundreds of thousands or even millions of white suburban women who won the House in 2018.

hundreds of thousands of black voters who would vote for Biden but not Sanders.

sure there are swing voters. Esp if you consider people who won't vote for a Socialist.

Racket just said he's not a swing voter. A swing voter is someone who can be convinced to vote for Trump instead of Sanders or instead of Biden.

The same is true of black voters and suburban women and anyone else. None are swing voters. Everyone either loves Trump or loathes him.

It's all about turnout. So there are those like Racket who will stay home if it's Bernie. There are others who will stay home if it's Biden.

So who can generate more enthusiasm and turn out more of the anti-Trump vote? I think that's Bernie for sure.

Sally Vix wrote:

jesseriley wrote:

In the end, most people will have to vote against trump to avoid making him dictator of a country run by trolls, russia, and offshore money that never gets taxed.

You guys have no idea what socialism is like. Have you ever been to Sweden? You need to think long and hard about having a Socialist at the helm. America would be changed forever, and not for the better. As bad a scoundrel that Trump is, Bernie as president would do everlasting damage to the country.

It looks like you've never been to Sweden

Ok, so what you just said, how critical is it to you that he doesn't get 4 more years?

Trollminator wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

You guys have no idea what socialism is like. Have you ever been to Sweden? You need to think long and hard about having a Socialist at the helm. America would be changed forever, and not for the better. As bad a scoundrel that Trump is, Bernie as president would do everlasting damage to the country.

It looks like you've never been to Sweden

I have not but often go to Belgium and other countries in the region. i know what paying people to do nothing can dampen the economy. You ever been to Europe?

jesseriley wrote:

Trumpanzees are certainly proving that they will troll whoever is the opposition, ha ha.

Yes, vote for trump & trolls.

ding ding ding

agip wrote:

Racket wrote:

Fair enough. I accept the premise and choose to vote third party.

FFS

listen to yourself equating sanders and trump. Write that down, put it in your calendar for Feb 6, 2030. You will be ashamed.

You are giving Trump way too much credit.

agip wrote:

Racket wrote:

Fair enough. I accept the premise and choose to vote third party.

FFS

listen to yourself equating sanders and trump. Write that down, put it in your calendar for Feb 6, 2030. You will be ashamed.

Policy-wise? Yes, I believe they're pretty equivalent. Both platforms are thinly veiled cries to authoritarianism with little (if any) indication that they actually read a book on history, economics, or politics after the age of 20. Bernie is no doubt a nicer person though so I'll give him that.

Anything else?