https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EPofMoaWkAIUlfW?format=jpg&name=small
Trump acquittal is coming. Tick, tick, tick.
Trump acquittal is coming. Tick, tick, tick.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Treadhead wrote:
No, you were shown to have claimed ownership to the phrase “echo chamber” a few days ago on here, do you need to be shown up for the third time on this issue to finally accept you got it wrong?
I coined the term going on FOUR YEARS ago, long before you ever popped up here. Most likely before you were old enough to vote, LOL!
Trump acquittal is coming. Tick, tick, tick.
No you didn’t coin the term four years ago.
Echo chamber has been commonly used for a very long time.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
The Irishman wrote:
LOL, rigged isn’t the sharpest tack.
Details matter. Just like most people say "Money is the root of all evil" when the correct term is: "For the LOVE of money is..."
Trump acquittal is coming. Tick, tick, tick.
Read the full exchange above, it speaks for itself.
I said “echo chamber seems to be your sound byte today”
You replied “ You must be new here. I coined that term years ago on the deleted thread”
You got it wrong.
The Irishman wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Details matter. Just like most people say "Money is the root of all evil" when the correct term is: "For the LOVE of money is..."
Trump acquittal is coming. Tick, tick, tick.
Read the full exchange above, it speaks for itself.
I said “echo chamber seems to be your sound byte today”
You replied “ You must be new here. I coined that term years ago on the deleted thread”
You got it wrong.
Game, set and match. Trigged still as clueless as ever.
Fat hurts wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
The GOP and WH defense would have done the same song and dance if the charge was bribery. They would have just moved the goal post to adjust to the charge... "the president believed he was acting in the interest of the country", "his actions, even if deemed bribery, simply do not rise to the level of impeachment"... come on man.
They would definitely not say that. Even the sleaziest Republican senator would never say that bribery is not impeachable. It's right there in the Constitution that a president shall be removed for bribery.
I'm not saying the Democrats would win the trial. But the failure to impeach for bribery made the Republican's snow job a whole lot easier.
They wouldn't have called it bribery, but are you kidding of course they would stoop as low as needed. Just look around, its the trump era!
Ciro wrote:
Game, set and match. Trigged still as clueless as ever.
The only two things he's known for are being trigged and having predicted agent orange wouldn't be impeached
Trollminator wrote:
Ciro wrote:
Game, set and match. Trigged still as clueless as ever.
The only two things he's known for are being trigged and having predicted agent orange wouldn't be impeached
Indeed, his stubborn refusal to accept that the OP said “echo chamber” only is remarkable to observe.
L L wrote:
So, they are currently debating whether to call witnesses but everyone has already announced their decision prior to this debate.
Is that correct?
That's the way the congress rolls.
Trollminator wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
They would definitely not say that. Even the sleaziest Republican senator would never say that bribery is not impeachable. It's right there in the Constitution that a president shall be removed for bribery.
I'm not saying the Democrats would win the trial. But the failure to impeach for bribery made the Republican's snow job a whole lot easier.
They wouldn't have called it bribery, but are you kidding of course they would stoop as low as needed. Just look around, its the trump era!
That's my point. If Tiny were impeached for bribery, the Republicans would not be able to say that the charges don't rise to the level of impeachment.
They still would not convict, but they would have an even tougher time finding a rationale. They would have to stoop even lower. And that does matter to some voters.
Ciro wrote:
The Irishman wrote:
Read the full exchange above, it speaks for itself.
I said “echo chamber seems to be your sound byte today”
You replied “ You must be new here. I coined that term years ago on the deleted thread”
You got it wrong.
Game, set and match. Trigged still as clueless as ever.
If you still believe that Trump is losing in November, you are extremely deluded, have terminal TDS and have zero sense of reality. There is no cure for liberal clowns that infest this thread.
Please continue supporting fools such as Quid Pro Joe, Pocahonky or Crazy Bernie who have no chance to win. You will be triggered for another term.
Focus on the big picture:
Trump acquittal is coming.
Trump will be reelected.
KAG2020
Wouldn't it be funny if Republicans were rushing through this trial without witnesses because they already made a secret pact to convict Trump?
Stunning announcement to come ...
Treadhead wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
The only two things he's known for are being trigged and having predicted agent orange wouldn't be impeached
Indeed, his stubborn refusal to accept that the OP said “echo chamber” only is remarkable to observe.
It is even more remarkable how you keep making up lies.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Ciro wrote:
Game, set and match. Trigged still as clueless as ever.
If you still believe that Trump is losing in November, you are extremely deluded, have terminal TDS and have zero sense of reality. There is no cure for liberal clowns that infest this thread.
Please continue supporting fools such as Quid Pro Joe, Pocahonky or Crazy Bernie who have no chance to win. You will be triggered for another term.
Focus on the big picture:
Trump acquittal is coming.
Trump will be reelected.
KAG2020
I’ve never claimed that Trump will lose in November. I think depending on who the Dems nominate it could go either way. Are you confusing me with someone else? Or is this just a weak attempt to deflect since you’ve been made to look foolish by other posters?
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Treadhead wrote:
Indeed, his stubborn refusal to accept that the OP said “echo chamber” only is remarkable to observe.
It is even more remarkable how you keep making up lies.
The conversation speaks for itself, I said “echo chamber” you claimed to have coined that term and now you’re back tracking like a weasel. Cringeworthy.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Treadhead wrote:
Indeed, his stubborn refusal to accept that the OP said “echo chamber” only is remarkable to observe.
It is even more remarkable how you keep making up lies.
I read The Irishman’s actual words followed by your actual words, it’s not up for debate. You claimed you coined the term echo chamber, that’s how stupid you are.
Treadhead wrote:
The Irishman wrote:
Just how many years ago exactly did you coin the term echo chamber?
Bump...
The bold text proves it. You may have comprehended it incorrectly but either way the OP said ECHO CHAMBER (only).
The Irishman wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
It is even more remarkable how you keep making up lies.
The conversation speaks for itself, I said “echo chamber” you claimed to have coined that term and now you’re back tracking like a weasel. Cringeworthy.
Ha! No more cringeworthy as LL who backtracked on banning himself. He is a big time weasel.
Do You Remember wrote:
truth b told2 wrote:
Also check the chart of our deficit spending. This level of debt is unheard in nonwar and in healthy economic times. It is pretty irresponsible but that won't surprise anyone.
And who controls the spending...that’s right the Democrat controlled Congress.
Well that is a surprise. It seemed that Republicans are in control of the Senate.
Guys, all trigged has are weak triumphant attempts on here, any time he engages he looks stupid.
His echo chamber claim and continued denial is just embarrassing.
I’m not LL and that doesn’t make you any less wrong.