Fat hurts wrote:
Treadhead wrote:
Whatever troll dude, people have caught onto you.
Bye bye tedious troll.
Lately, I almost always skip anything written by Sally. Also, I usually skip anything written in response to Sally.
That’s exactly what I do also. Skip right over his dishonest worthless input.
Fat hurts wrote:
Treadhead wrote:
Whatever troll dude, people have caught onto you.
Bye bye tedious troll.
Lately, I almost always skip anything written by Sally. Also, I usually skip anything written in response to Sally.
Great, Fat Hurts. This thread has become soley about trashing Trump. You and Flagpole, and Trolliminator and everyone else come on 24/7 and just trash Trump all day long and all week long. Rigged might provide some blowback but it is basically a liberal circle jerk where you Libs rag on Trump non-stop. My last post had some valid questions but you guys don't want that. You want to just rag on Trump all day and all night long and you will call me a troll which is your perogrative but ths thread reallly sucks when you have no one rebutting what you say. Enough.
Sally Vix wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Lately, I almost always skip anything written by Sally. Also, I usually skip anything written in response to Sally.
Great, Fat Hurts. This thread has become soley about trashing Trump. You and Flagpole, and Trolliminator and everyone else come on 24/7 and just trash Trump all day long and all week long. Rigged might provide some blowback but it is basically a liberal circle jerk where you Libs rag on Trump non-stop. My last post had some valid questions but you guys don't want that. You want to just rag on Trump all day and all night long and you will call me a troll which is your perogrative but ths thread reallly sucks when you have no one rebutting what you say. Enough.
l love you guys but you can't just rag on Trump all day long and rag on everything and everyone who may support Trump. Kinda pathetic and getting old. Go ahead and rip me a new one - I will be okay. You don't want altnernative viewpoints. I get it you want everyone to just trash Trump all the time.
Sally Vix wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Lately, I almost always skip anything written by Sally. Also, I usually skip anything written in response to Sally.
Great, Fat Hurts. This thread has become soley about trashing Trump. You and Flagpole, and Trolliminator and everyone else come on 24/7 and just trash Trump all day long and all week long. Rigged might provide some blowback but it is basically a liberal circle jerk where you Libs rag on Trump non-stop. My last post had some valid questions but you guys don't want that. You want to just rag on Trump all day and all night long and you will call me a troll which is your perogrative but ths thread reallly sucks when you have no one rebutting what you say. Enough.
Is English your second language? Do you even know how to spell this?
Sally Vix wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Great, Fat Hurts. This thread has become soley about trashing Trump. You and Flagpole, and Trolliminator and everyone else come on 24/7 and just trash Trump all day long and all week long. Rigged might provide some blowback but it is basically a liberal circle jerk where you Libs rag on Trump non-stop. My last post had some valid questions but you guys don't want that. You want to just rag on Trump all day and all night long and you will call me a troll which is your perogrative but ths thread reallly sucks when you have no one rebutting what you say. Enough.
l love you guys but you can't just rag on Trump all day long and rag on everything and everyone who may support Trump. Kinda pathetic and getting old. Go ahead and rip me a new one - I will be okay. You don't want altnernative viewpoints. I get it you want everyone to just trash Trump all the time.
Is English your second language? Do you even know how to spell alternative?
The Irishman wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
l love you guys but you can't just rag on Trump all day long and rag on everything and everyone who may support Trump. Kinda pathetic and getting old. Go ahead and rip me a new one - I will be okay. You don't want altnernative viewpoints. I get it you want everyone to just trash Trump all the time.
Is English your second language? Do you even know how to spell alternative?
Touche. My apologies for ripping for your misspelling.
Sally Vix wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
There have been some interesting articles about what happens in case of a tie vote during this trial. And we could be headed for a tie vote on witnesses. If Romney, Collins, and Murkowski vote for witnesses with all 47 Democrats then it would be a 50-50 tie.
The Vice President can not break a tie in an impeachment trial.
A Chief Justice has broken a tie before, but that was over 150 years ago.
If Roberts declines to break a tie, the motion will not carry and we will not have witnesses.
Friday's vote on witnesses could be epic in more ways than one.
We have already had witnesses. The Dems in the House had 17 witnesses and allowed none for the Repubs. How peculiar they would dominate the proceeding like that and then bellyache that the Pubs in the Senate are now allowing witnesses. The House already had 17 witnesses and the Senators have been able to read those testimonies. Every thing the House did the Senate has all the documents and EVERYTHING. The witnesses the House want now - Bolton et al. - were available to testify in the House. If the Senate allows witnesses and Bolton turns out to be a dud - how long and how many witnesses will the House managers demand? This has already gone on for 3 years. You want endless investigations of Trump? That is what this has become.
You are wrong about the Republicans having no witnesses in the house impeachment but you know that.
You used to troll more effectively.
Truth b told2 wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
We have already had witnesses. The Dems in the House had 17 witnesses and allowed none for the Repubs. How peculiar they would dominate the proceeding like that and then bellyache that the Pubs in the Senate are now allowing witnesses. The House already had 17 witnesses and the Senators have been able to read those testimonies. Every thing the House did the Senate has all the documents and EVERYTHING. The witnesses the House want now - Bolton et al. - were available to testify in the House. If the Senate allows witnesses and Bolton turns out to be a dud - how long and how many witnesses will the House managers demand? This has already gone on for 3 years. You want endless investigations of Trump? That is what this has become.
You are wrong about the Republicans having no witnesses in the house impeachment but you know that.
You used to troll more effectively.
This is what one of the defense defenders said. Also, one of the pundits said it as well. That the House had 17 of their own witnesses and the defense had none. I don't make up this stuff for jolies - please .
Sally Vix wrote:
The Irishman wrote:
Is English your second language? Do you even know how to spell alternative?
Touche. My apologies for ripping for your misspelling.
Yeah it was very petty troll.
Truth b told2 wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
We have already had witnesses. The Dems in the House had 17 witnesses and allowed none for the Repubs. How peculiar they would dominate the proceeding like that and then bellyache that the Pubs in the Senate are now allowing witnesses. The House already had 17 witnesses and the Senators have been able to read those testimonies. Every thing the House did the Senate has all the documents and EVERYTHING. The witnesses the House want now - Bolton et al. - were available to testify in the House. If the Senate allows witnesses and Bolton turns out to be a dud - how long and how many witnesses will the House managers demand? This has already gone on for 3 years. You want endless investigations of Trump? That is what this has become.
You are wrong about the Republicans having no witnesses in the house impeachment but you know that.
You used to troll more effectively.
Ignore this trolling dude.
Sally, your view point is appreciated.
But the deflection and lies get old.
If you don’t think Trump should be removed, the only remotely acceptable excuse is that you know he did what he is accused of, you agree that it was wrong, but you don’t feel that punishment fits the crime.
Then try to say with a straight face that you wouldn’t want a Democrat removed for the same thing.
Gaaaaarrrryyyy! Names changed but same old sh!t.
LL - thanks for your post.
I am sincere in my posts. It doesn't seem that anything I say will not be ripped by you guys. Many of you guys I respect very much and we have different viewpoints. I firmly believe that many of you have been out to rid Trump from day one. You guys can rip be all day long but my thoughts are sincere. Many of you are very smart and I respect your viewpoints. God bless you!
L L wrote:
Sally, your view point is appreciated.
But the deflection and lies get old.
If you don’t think Trump should be removed, the only remotely acceptable excuse is that you know he did what he is accused of, you agree that it was wrong, but you don’t feel that punishment fits the crime.
Then try to say with a straight face that you wouldn’t want a Democrat removed for the same thing.
A variety of opinions and views are of course welcome, but when you’re dealing with a man pretending to be a woman who doesn’t act in good faith and has a habit of personal attacks then what’s the point?
I’m sticking with my policy of ignoring him.
Ciro wrote:
L L wrote:
Sally, your view point is appreciated.
But the deflection and lies get old.
If you don’t think Trump should be removed, the only remotely acceptable excuse is that you know he did what he is accused of, you agree that it was wrong, but you don’t feel that punishment fits the crime.
Then try to say with a straight face that you wouldn’t want a Democrat removed for the same thing.
A variety of opinions and views are of course welcome, but when you’re dealing with a man pretending to be a woman who doesn’t act in good faith and has a habit of personal attacks then what’s the point?
I’m sticking with my policy of ignoring him.
Great, Ciro. Just ignore me. Personal attacks? You do know that I have been called outrageously stupid like 10000 timeons. Are those not personal attacks? Again, I am only here for honest discourse. If you choose to ignore me, I wish you the best! God bless you. Everything I post here is sincere but many would say it is trolling. Again, god bless you.
Ok, we’ve been out to get him from day one.
Because he’s been vile from day one.
The tape of him bragging about sexually assaulting women came out before the election - and millions still voted fir him. Kind of hard to take.
He openly asked Russia to interfere in the election.
He sent Flynn to Russia before his inauguration to promise sanctions would be relieved.
And on day one he sent his press secretary to lie about the crowd size.
A couple months in, his own party started an investigation into him.
You keep reminding us that you don’t think he’s a good person.
So I look to your posts to understand how partisanship and tribal hate of Democrats lead you to constantly defend a person you really don’t like, simply because he chose to call himself a Republican.
You can’t like his deficit spending. You can’t like his tariffs. His policies are not conservative and free market. But he calls Democrats enemies so you like him for that.
L L wrote:
Sally, your view point is appreciated.
But the deflection and lies get old.
If you don’t think Trump should be removed, the only remotely acceptable excuse is that you know he did what he is accused of, you agree that it was wrong, but you don’t feel that punishment fits the crime.
Then try to say with a straight face that you wouldn’t want a Democrat removed for the same thing.
Well Lamar just announced he’s voting to reject witnesses. That’s not surprising but good to see one of them accept that trump bribed. They are all going on the record that they agree he did what he did but not grounds for removing him. The cover up will hurt them. I told you guys they have been happily walking the plank right behind trump this whole time. There will be no witnesses. Bolton’s book will come out, and perhaps he’ll man up and make the rounds on TV and of course we will continue to get the daily sprinkle of trump’s continued criminality right up until election.
Get ready to see him even more unhinged if that’s even possible. He will likely openly commit impeachable acts to try to beat down his opponents and squeeze a few more bucks out his position.