"The campaign against me was about more than one university and one leader," said Gay. "This was merely a single skirmish in a broader war to unravel public faith in pillars of American society. Campaigns of this kind often start with attacks on education and expertise, because these are the tools that best equip communities to see through propaganda."
She continued, "It is not lost on me that I make an ideal canvas for projecting every anxiety about the generational and demographic changes unfolding on American campuses: a Black woman selected to lead a storied institution."
-
24
-
Gay elaborated on her comments in a later statement, saying: "There are some who have confused a right to free expression with the idea that Harvard will condone calls for violence against Jewish students."
"Calls for violence or genocide against the Jewish community, or any religious or ethnic group, are vile, they have no place at Harvard," she said, adding, "Those who threaten our Jewish students will be held to account."What Harvard students threatened other Jewish Harvard students????
Stefanik is on BS
38 -
The Harvard Corporation responded in a Dec. 12 statement that Dr. Gay requested an independent review of her published work in light of the allegations. The results revealed a few instances of "inadequate citation" but "no violation of Harvard's standards of research misconduct," the statement read.
The corporation announced that Gay would be requesting four corrections in two articles to insert citations and quotation marks that were not present in the original text. However, the corporation initially affirmed its support for Gay amid the allegations in the statement.
"Our extensive deliberations affirm our confidence that President Gay is the right leader to help our community heal and to address the very serious societal issues we are facing," the statement read.Dr. Gay resigned on her own accord. She wasn't fired. She was called every vile racial epithet with death threats.
28 -
As usual wrote:
The Harvard Corporation responded in a Dec. 12 statement that Dr. Gay requested an independent review of her published work in light of the allegations. The results revealed a few instances of "inadequate citation" but "no violation of Harvard's standards of research misconduct," the statement read.
The corporation announced that Gay would be requesting four corrections in two articles to insert citations and quotation marks that were not present in the original text. However, the corporation initially affirmed its support for Gay amid the allegations in the statement.
"Our extensive deliberations affirm our confidence that President Gay is the right leader to help our community heal and to address the very serious societal issues we are facing," the statement read.Dr. Gay resigned on her own accord. She wasn't fired. She was called every vile racial epithet with death threats.
She was pressured to resign because her plagiarism is indefensible not because idiots were mean to her on the internet.
84 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
As usual wrote:
The Harvard Corporation responded in a Dec. 12 statement that Dr. Gay requested an independent review of her published work in light of the allegations. The results revealed a few instances of "inadequate citation" but "no violation of Harvard's standards of research misconduct," the statement read.
The corporation announced that Gay would be requesting four corrections in two articles to insert citations and quotation marks that were not present in the original text. However, the corporation initially affirmed its support for Gay amid the allegations in the statement.
"Our extensive deliberations affirm our confidence that President Gay is the right leader to help our community heal and to address the very serious societal issues we are facing," the statement read.Dr. Gay resigned on her own accord. She wasn't fired. She was called every vile racial epithet with death threats.
She was pressured to resign because her plagiarism is indefensible not because idiots were mean to her on the internet.
No violation of standards of research misconduct.
So you are saying Harvard and the independent review are lying? You are the one who is the habitual liar.
25 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
As usual wrote:
The Harvard Corporation responded in a Dec. 12 statement that Dr. Gay requested an independent review of her published work in light of the allegations. The results revealed a few instances of "inadequate citation" but "no violation of Harvard's standards of research misconduct," the statement read.
The corporation announced that Gay would be requesting four corrections in two articles to insert citations and quotation marks that were not present in the original text. However, the corporation initially affirmed its support for Gay amid the allegations in the statement.
"Our extensive deliberations affirm our confidence that President Gay is the right leader to help our community heal and to address the very serious societal issues we are facing," the statement read.Dr. Gay resigned on her own accord. She wasn't fired. She was called every vile racial epithet with death threats.
She was pressured to resign because her plagiarism is indefensible not because idiots were mean to her on the internet.
Wrong.
37 -
Trollminator wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
You would agree that Claudine Gay is a fraud, yes?
1) For inconsequential plagiarism infractions, instances where the 2) original authors have openly said they felt they were appropriately credited and that it did not amount to theft of their ideas, and for what 3) Harvard does not consider violation of their standards for research misconduct? No, for that it's disingenuous to broadly call her a fraud.
Great job. Three blatantly false statements in a single sentence.
You do better with your anti-Semitic musings. At least you believe those statements are true. You can’t really believe the BS you posted above.
101 -
Hynis wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
1) For inconsequential plagiarism infractions, instances where the 2) original authors have openly said they felt they were appropriately credited and that it did not amount to theft of their ideas, and for what 3) Harvard does not consider violation of their standards for research misconduct? No, for that it's disingenuous to broadly call her a fraud.
Great job. Three blatantly false statements in a single sentence.
You do better with your anti-Semitic musings. At least you believe those statements are true. You can’t really believe the BS you posted above.
Per number 2, Carol Swain did not seem happy about having her work plagiarized. She wrote an opinion in the Wall Street Journal about it.
"When scholars aren’t cited adequately or their work is ignored, it harms them because academic stature is determined by how often other researchers cite your work. Ms. Gay had no problem riding on the coattails of people whose work she used without proper attribution. Many of those whose work she pilfered aren’t as incensed as I am. They are elites who have benefited from a system that protects its own."
72 -
As usual wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
She was pressured to resign because her plagiarism is indefensible not because idiots were mean to her on the internet.
Wrong.
You argue like she does.
73 -
what the............ wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
She was pressured to resign because her plagiarism is indefensible not because idiots were mean to her on the internet.
No violation of standards of research misconduct.
So you are saying Harvard and the independent review are lying? You are the one who is the habitual liar.
I'm saying you need to quit reading what her defenders say happened and read what actually happened.
The only people left defending her are people who don't understand what she actually did and racists.
122 -
As usual wrote:
The Harvard Corporation responded in a Dec. 12 statement that Dr. Gay requested an independent review of her published work in light of the allegations. The results revealed a few instances of "inadequate citation" but "no violation of Harvard's standards of research misconduct," the statement read.
The corporation announced that Gay would be requesting four corrections in two articles to insert citations and quotation marks that were not present in the original text. However, the corporation initially affirmed its support for Gay amid the allegations in the statement.
"Our extensive deliberations affirm our confidence that President Gay is the right leader to help our community heal and to address the very serious societal issues we are facing," the statement read.Dr. Gay resigned on her own accord. She wasn't fired. She was called every vile racial epithet with death threats.
You are lying. Up to half of her thesis was plagiarized. Quit lying.
103 -
Trollminator wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
You would agree that Claudine Gay is a fraud, yes?
For inconsequential plagiarism infractions, instances where the original authors have openly said they felt they were appropriately credited and that it did not amount to theft of their ideas, and for what Harvard does not consider violation of their standards for research misconduct? No, for that it's disingenuous to broadly call her a fraud.
You are fine and dandy if 100 of the presidents of the top universities in America plagiarized others for their these? They are all fraud but you are okay with that? Since "not consequential?" YOu jumped the shark on this one, Ginamator.
83 -
Sally Vix wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
For inconsequential plagiarism infractions, instances where the original authors have openly said they felt they were appropriately credited and that it did not amount to theft of their ideas, and for what Harvard does not consider violation of their standards for research misconduct? No, for that it's disingenuous to broadly call her a fraud.
You are fine and dandy if 100 of the presidents of the top universities in America plagiarized others for their these? They are all fraud but you are okay with that? Since "not consequential?" YOu jumped the shark on this one, Ginamator.
He said before that he didn’t mind that she was guilty of plagiarism multiple times in multiple published works. He said he’s just upset at how she got caught. Then he blamed others for attacking higher ed. He’s an idiot.
51 -
Sally Vix wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
For inconsequential plagiarism infractions, instances where the original authors have openly said they felt they were appropriately credited and that it did not amount to theft of their ideas, and for what Harvard does not consider violation of their standards for research misconduct? No, for that it's disingenuous to broadly call her a fraud.
You are fine and dandy if 100 of the presidents of the top universities in America plagiarized others for their these? They are all fraud but you are okay with that? Since "not consequential?" YOu jumped the shark on this one, Ginamator.
It’s also a shame how people like him are trying to redefine plagiarism.
62 -
Hynis wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
You are fine and dandy if 100 of the presidents of the top universities in America plagiarized others for their these? They are all fraud but you are okay with that? Since "not consequential?" YOu jumped the shark on this one, Ginamator.
It’s also a shame how people like him are trying to redefine plagiarism.
True, just ask Rufo's wife
11 -
As usual wrote:
The Harvard Corporation responded in a Dec. 12 statement that Dr. Gay requested an independent review of her published work in light of the allegations. The results revealed a few instances of "inadequate citation" but "no violation of Harvard's standards of research misconduct," the statement read.
The corporation announced that Gay would be requesting four corrections in two articles to insert citations and quotation marks that were not present in the original text. However, the corporation initially affirmed its support for Gay amid the allegations in the statement.
"Our extensive deliberations affirm our confidence that President Gay is the right leader to help our community heal and to address the very serious societal issues we are facing," the statement read.Dr. Gay resigned on her own accord. She wasn't fired. She was called every vile racial epithet with death threats.
Brother man, why are defending a sub-competent fraud? It has zero to with race or ideology and everything to do with ETHICS. (It wasn't even a "white" guy who wrote that book, rather a "swarthy" Greek, check it out sometime, you might learn something.)
Meanwhile, if you want to "uplift the race" for real-- which I highly doubt-- why don't you tell us about Robin D.G. Kelley, or George Lewis at Columbia, or any # of high profile, brilliant, original scholars few people gaf about because knuckleheads of privilege like Gay got caught?
Maybe it was the burritos?! #Equity
62 -
As usual wrote:
"The campaign against me was about more than one university and one leader," said Gay. "This was merely a single skirmish in a broader war to unravel public faith in pillars of American society. Campaigns of this kind often start with attacks on education and expertise, because these are the tools that best equip communities to see through propaganda."
She continued, "It is not lost on me that I make an ideal canvas for projecting every anxiety about the generational and demographic changes unfolding on American campuses: a Black woman selected to lead a storied institution."“I plagiarized a few papers , failed to denounce rabid antisemitism at Harvard when asked, but I’m the real victim”.
62 -
Reading is fundamental
25 -
Never Heard of John Hope Franklin Nope wrote:
As usual wrote:
The Harvard Corporation responded in a Dec. 12 statement that Dr. Gay requested an independent review of her published work in light of the allegations. The results revealed a few instances of "inadequate citation" but "no violation of Harvard's standards of research misconduct," the statement read.
The corporation announced that Gay would be requesting four corrections in two articles to insert citations and quotation marks that were not present in the original text. However, the corporation initially affirmed its support for Gay amid the allegations in the statement.
"Our extensive deliberations affirm our confidence that President Gay is the right leader to help our community heal and to address the very serious societal issues we are facing," the statement read.Dr. Gay resigned on her own accord. She wasn't fired. She was called every vile racial epithet with death threats.
Brother man, why are defending a sub-competent fraud? It has zero to with race or ideology and everything to do with ETHICS. (It wasn't even a "white" guy who wrote that book, rather a "swarthy" Greek, check it out sometime, you might learn something.)
Meanwhile, if you want to "uplift the race" for real-- which I highly doubt-- why don't you tell us about Robin D.G. Kelley, or George Lewis at Columbia, or any # of high profile, brilliant, original scholars few people gaf about because knuckleheads of privilege like Gay got caught?
Maybe it was the burritos?! #Equity
not your brother.
If it wasn't about race, then explain the thousands of vile racial threats she received?
24 -
Belarussiya wrote:
As usual wrote:
"The campaign against me was about more than one university and one leader," said Gay. "This was merely a single skirmish in a broader war to unravel public faith in pillars of American society. Campaigns of this kind often start with attacks on education and expertise, because these are the tools that best equip communities to see through propaganda."
She continued, "It is not lost on me that I make an ideal canvas for projecting every anxiety about the generational and demographic changes unfolding on American campuses: a Black woman selected to lead a storied institution."“I plagiarized a few papers , failed to denounce rabid antisemitism at Harvard when asked, but I’m the real victim”.
fake ass quote. you aren't funny, you are a racist POS who wishes they were a tenth as accomplished as Dr. Gay
28
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun