Not good for the case against Trump or Biden:
Not good for the case against Trump or Biden:
Sally Vix wrote:
The Dershowitz testimony is extremely compelling. I could see a few Dem Senators voting to acquit.
Go play with the traffic you tedious troll.
Dersh never found the real killers after getting OJ acquitted. But it’s only been 30 years.
jesseriley wrote:
Dersh never found the real killers after getting OJ acquitted. But it’s only been 30 years.
That was OJ scrambling around the Riviera Country Club (where the memberships are like $1 millon) looking for the likely dirt-poo rapscallions who murdered his wife and Ron.
Sally Vix wrote:
agip wrote:
yeah, the classic conservatives who would vote for Biden but not Bernie or Trump is a small group but it exists. I doubt it's a big group but who knows.
The real swing vote is suburban women who voted for Trump and then the Dems in 2018. That's the big target and I really think asking them to vote to raise their taxes and outlaw their health insurance and welcome in all the woke PC issues the Dem left represents... might be a bridge too far for them.
It is not a small group at all. Donald Trump is a terrible person but I like his policies. I do not think he has committed impeachable offenses but if he really did I would vote for Biden in a heartbeat. I am NEVER voting for Bernie or Warren. I really believe there are many, many conservatives who feel the same as I.
Yes you do know he has committed impeachable offenses and you admitted it a while ago. Own it.
Smorbun wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
How many people lost their insurance when Obamacare was implemented? I know very close friends who saw their insurance premiums go from $2,000 a year to $30,000 a year with worse coverage. is that improvement?
Liar.
Yeah that’s just a straight up lie
The real Pookie Washington wrote:
THIS JUST IN..........Trump is now saying he doesn’t really know Bolton. He has taken a few pictures with him but he does that with many people.
And perfectly timed with FOX bashing him when they were calling him a conservative hero until a few days ago
Sally Vixxxxxens wrote:
Sally Vixxxxxens wrote:
There were no polls showing him winning in 2016. Should we trust polls to be wrong again?
Hillary was a guaranteed winner in 2016. She was like a 97% guaranteed winner. What happened?
Here is 3.9 Sally calling something until 100% a guarantee... and wants us to believe he “was graduated”
Trollminator wrote:
Sally Vixxxxxens wrote:
Hillary was a guaranteed winner in 2016. She was like a 97% guaranteed winner. What happened?
Here is 3.9 Sally calling something until 100% a guarantee... and wants us to believe he “was graduated”
*under 100%
agip wrote:
I tune in to the impeachment trial when I can at work and I have yet to hear an actual defense from the trump team.
It's all 'they've been out to get trump from day 1' and 'the house was unfair'
My viewing is just a small sample but i have to think senators are smart enough to see that this is not really a defense at all.
I love that R senators are furious at trump for hiding the bolton thing - the wh let R senators insist that there was no quid pro quo and then of course Bolton proves there was. Trump let the R senators hang, and Trump will do that again and again. it's how he works.
1. All R senators know he’s guilty
2. Most of them are only paying attention to the extent they need to straighten out their narrative for when they vote to acquit. They are only looking for some cover - there is no interest in any truth.
3. Trump’s defense team is not going to waste this love time actually defending when they know the end vote. They are spending this time helping him against his opponent.
4. Most Rs are simply going to avoid the Bolton issue. If they focus on the illegitimacy of the impeachment itself, then no need to bother with substance.
The Irishman wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
First it was that Dems rammed through impeachment and didn't take their time, now defense team is saying getting Bolton's testimony would take too long and they have nothing to do with that - witnesses have no business being part of a trial... The guy WANTS to testify and was not allowed, there is no doubt about this. Also, he was a conservative champion on FOX but something changed this weekend - now they are starting to tear him down.
You’re not paying attention at all.
Bolton was asked to testify to the House and he refused. He now says through his lawyers that he’s willing to testify IF the Senate forces him to, knowing fine well they won’t.
His real motive is money. What will result in highest number of books sold? He will want to testify if it can make him rich.
One interesting observation that hasn’t been explored yet is the timing of Bolton’s change of heart”. It happened just a couple of days before trump ordered the assassination. Was it really just coincidence? Or was it a) trump trying to appease him in hopes he wouldn’t turn on him or b) somehow Bolton was filled in on the expected hit and for some reason actually didn’t agree with trump’s decision. Bolton was such a hawk on Iran so it’s hard to think it could be the latter. Regardless, the timing is interesting.
Trollminator wrote:
The Irishman wrote:
You’re not paying attention at all.
Bolton was asked to testify to the House and he refused. He now says through his lawyers that he’s willing to testify IF the Senate forces him to, knowing fine well they won’t.
His real motive is money. What will result in highest number of books sold? He will want to testify if it can make him rich.
One interesting observation that hasn’t been explored yet is the timing of Bolton’s change of heart”. It happened just a couple of days before trump ordered the assassination. Was it really just coincidence? Or was it a) trump trying to appease him in hopes he wouldn’t turn on him or b) somehow Bolton was filled in on the expected hit and for some reason actually didn’t agree with trump’s decision. Bolton was such a hawk on Iran so it’s hard to think it could be the latter. Regardless, the timing is interesting.
Yes his real motive is money.
He had a change of heart when it went to the Senate knowing that he wouldn’t actually get called.
Everyone can see this.
Also the reason Fox are turning on him is because his book throws their hero Trump under the bus.
The Irishman wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
His real motive is money. What will result in highest number of books sold? He will want to testify if it can make him rich.
One interesting observation that hasn’t been explored yet is the timing of Bolton’s change of heart”. It happened just a couple of days before trump ordered the assassination. Was it really just coincidence? Or was it a) trump trying to appease him in hopes he wouldn’t turn on him or b) somehow Bolton was filled in on the expected hit and for some reason actually didn’t agree with trump’s decision. Bolton was such a hawk on Iran so it’s hard to think it could be the latter. Regardless, the timing is interesting.
Yes his real motive is money.
He had a change of heart when it went to the Senate knowing that he wouldn’t actually get called.
Everyone can see this.
The only thing that matters would be his testimony and whether he's credible.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Point of information. AOC is not eligible to be VP because she is too young.
And stupid
And socialist
And irrelevant
. . . which is why Trumpettes never miss an opportunity to make the discussion about her. Hmmmm
Fat hurts wrote:
As a religious person myself, I like that they start with a prayer. I like the idea that our elected officials at least pretend to acknowledge being subject to a higher calling.
You like to see our elected officials lying? That is very strange.
The Irishman wrote:
Also the reason Fox are turning on him is because his book throws their hero Trump under the bus.
The Bolton hire never made sense to me. President Trump ran on ending wars and here he hires a warmonger who’s never met a conflict that he doesn’t like. It was highly predictable that they would end up at odds.
1100 wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
As a religious person myself, I like that they start with a prayer. I like the idea that our elected officials at least pretend to acknowledge being subject to a higher calling.
You like to see our elected officials lying? That is very strange.
Stuck with the handle “1100” I see, too funny.
This is turning into a thriller. Pubs want to end it, dems want to keep adding evidence!