Sally Vix wrote:
Bring on the truth! I love the truth.
This would seem to not be the case.
Sally Vix wrote:
Bring on the truth! I love the truth.
This would seem to not be the case.
The Fokus wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Bring on the truth! I love the truth.
This would seem to not be the case.
Do you want to find out the Joe Biden/Hunter Biden corruption scheme? Or do you want to gloss over that? Sweet it under the rug like it never happened? I would love to delve more in to it. Would you not too?
Sally Vix wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
It's still an interpretation with some exagerations and additions, but the gist was that Schiff thought it was a shake down. The WH never released the full transcript so we don't know if the asking 8 times is true.
Trump's interpretation was that it was a perfect phone call. Trump said that he was asking for investigations into the Bidens and CrowdStrike on behalf of the country. Is that not a lie?
Aztec - did you see Dodgers' fans are buying tickets to the Astros/Angels game? Can you imagine how strongly the AStros's players will be booed wherever they play? Just going to be a crazy year for the Stros.
How about if Cora managed again and his team visited Dodger Stadium? He would have to wear body armour when he came out to change pitchers.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Aztec - did you see Dodgers' fans are buying tickets to the Astros/Angels game? Can you imagine how strongly the AStros's players will be booed wherever they play? Just going to be a crazy year for the Stros.
How about if Cora managed again and his team visited Dodger Stadium? He would have to wear body armour when he came out to change pitchers.
Cora is never managing again at least for 2 or 3 years. The Astros had the best 1/2 punch in Hinch and Luhnow. I am an ardent Astros fan but am really wondering how I will support the team when they have been cheating. Altuve - cheater? Springer - cheater? Bregman - cheater? I was never a fan of the Patriots cheating but they are doing the same stuff that the Astros have been doing.
Sally Vix wrote:
The Fokus wrote:
This would seem to not be the case.
Do you want to find out the Joe Biden/Hunter Biden corruption scheme? Or do you want to gloss over that? Sweet it under the rug like it never happened? I would love to delve more in to it. Would you not too?
Assuming there is corruption, I'd like to find out about anyone who's been involved in anything corrupt/illegal or disingenuous since before and after the election of 2016. This includes all of the avoidance of information/witnesses etc. which the POTUS has undertaken including the release of his tax returns.
You're not going to win asking for "finding out" about schemes if you're a Trump fan.
agip wrote:
I wish I had even the slightest faith in Dems getting this message out to voters.
Here's one way that's already been *proven* to work:
https://postcardstovoters.org/But it does count on people using their time and energy (and a little money) to do something more than just complain.
Trump wrote:
Where’s Hunter? ?
https://shop.donaldjtrump.com/products/wheres-hunter-tee
Found him parked in front of the Waldorf.
Look at that Porsche Panamera GTS- a cool $129K or a hefty lease but he can't afford child support for his other baby momma.
https://pagesix.com/2020/01/24/hunter-biden-snapped-grabbing-lunch-with-pregnant-wife-at-waldorf-astoria/amp/?__twitter_impression=trueIt should bbe impossible for the Republicans to prevent Bolton from testifying:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
It should bbe impossible for the Republicans to prevent Bolton from testifying:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/policy/national-security/480014-bolton-book-alleges-trump-tied-ukraine-aid-freeze-to-biden%3famp
While you are correct, it should also be noted that Bolton is a coward. He could have testified to the house, but he put book sales and profit ahead of the country.
He is a fake patriot and history will judge him harshly.
The whole Biden thing happened under the light of public disclosure during the Obama administration station without issue.
Trump has had years to look into this.
The senate can subpoena them for questioning whenever they want.
Trump’s AG can investigate whenever Trump gives the order.
No Democrat is stopping this from happening. You are acting like Congress is blocking something here.
Why did Trump wait for Biden to announce his candidacy to pretend to care about this?
Why did Trump ask a foreign leader to announce an investigation into this?
What exactly is stopping Trump from looking into this scheme you are saying you are so concerned about?
Treadhead wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
It should bbe impossible for the Republicans to prevent Bolton from testifying:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/policy/national-security/480014-bolton-book-alleges-trump-tied-ukraine-aid-freeze-to-biden%3fampWhile you are correct, it should also be noted that Bolton is a coward. He could have testified to the house, but he put book sales and profit ahead of the country.
He is a fake patriot and history will judge him harshly.
He refused to testify to the House at the direction of the WH. It's stated in his book that Trump did exactly what he is accused of doing . You think he is a coward. Is he a liar as well?
L L wrote:
The whole Biden thing happened under the light of public disclosure during the Obama administration station without issue.
Trump has had years to look into this.
The senate can subpoena them for questioning whenever they want.
Trump’s AG can investigate whenever Trump gives the order.
No Democrat is stopping this from happening. You are acting like Congress is blocking something here.
Why did Trump wait for Biden to announce his candidacy to pretend to care about this?
Why did Trump ask a foreign leader to announce an investigation into this?
What exactly is stopping Trump from looking into this scheme you are saying you are so concerned about?
If Trump was genuinely concerned with corruption he’d have used the DOJ and not a personal lawyer, Les Parnas and Igor Fruman.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Treadhead wrote:
While you are correct, it should also be noted that Bolton is a coward. He could have testified to the house, but he put book sales and profit ahead of the country.
He is a fake patriot and history will judge him harshly.
He refused to testify to the House at the direction of the WH. It's stated in his book that Trump did exactly what he is accused of doing . You think he is a coward. Is he a liar as well?
Correct me if my assumption is wrong. Could he have testified even though the WH directed him not to?
L L wrote:
The whole Biden thing happened under the light of public disclosure during the Obama administration station without issue.
Trump has had years to look into this.
The senate can subpoena them for questioning whenever they want.
Trump’s AG can investigate whenever Trump gives the order.
No Democrat is stopping this from happening. You are acting like Congress is blocking something here.
Why did Trump wait for Biden to announce his candidacy to pretend to care about this?
Why did Trump ask a foreign leader to announce an investigation into this?
What exactly is stopping Trump from looking into this scheme you are saying you are so concerned about?
Don't waste your time explaining anything to that idiot. Sally has no capacity to understand anything.
Treadhead wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
He refused to testify to the House at the direction of the WH. It's stated in his book that Trump did exactly what he is accused of doing . You think he is a coward. Is he a liar as well?
Correct me if my assumption is wrong. Could he have testified even though the WH directed him not to?
I'll admit that the legal aspects of his possible testimony to the House go over my head, but he's ready to go now and the Senate should call him.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Treadhead wrote:
Correct me if my assumption is wrong. Could he have testified even though the WH directed him not to?
I'll admit that the legal aspects of his possible testimony to the House go over my head, but he's ready to go now and the Senate should call him.
I’m 90% sure he could have testified to the house if he choose to.
I’ve read analysis about his willingness to testify now as nothing more than attention seeking as he has book coming out very soon. Basically he knows fine well that the Republican controlled senate will not call for him to testify.
Again I am open to correction, but it seems plausible even likely to me.
Treadhead wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
I'll admit that the legal aspects of his possible testimony to the House go over my head, but he's ready to go now and the Senate should call him.
I’m 90% sure he could have testified to the house if he choose to.
I’ve read analysis about his willingness to testify now as nothing more than attention seeking as he has book coming out very soon. Basically he knows fine well that the Republican controlled senate will not call for him to testify.
Again I am open to correction, but it seems plausible even likely to me.
Idk, I'll never read his book, but I sure as hell want him to testify. Not all Republicans are idiots and blocking an obviously incriminating witness from testifying should be impossible to justify. If they want to call Bolton a liar then bring in Mulvaney.
Sally Vix wrote:
The Fokus wrote:
This would seem to not be the case.
Do you want to find out the Joe Biden/Hunter Biden corruption scheme? Or do you want to gloss over that? Sweet it under the rug like it never happened? I would love to delve more in to it. Would you not too?
Donald Trump through William Barr controls the Justice Department and the Republicans via Mitch McConnell control the Senate and there is nothing stopping them from opening a formal investigation into the alleged "Joe Biden/Hunter Biden corruption scheme".
Not all Republicans are idiots?
So far, all House Republicans voted to not even have an impeachment inquiry.
All House Republicans voted not to impeach Trump.
All Senate Republicans voted to not enter new evidence.
They voted to not hear new witnesses.
And it looks like they will all vote that Trump did not abuse his power nor obstructed Congress.
They also voted to remove the Affordable Care Act with the replacement they promised.