jesseriley wrote:
Schiff: a trial before any witnesses testify is “@ss-backwards!”
No, he didn’t!!!!
He's the sharpest one on the floor by a mile
jesseriley wrote:
Schiff: a trial before any witnesses testify is “@ss-backwards!”
No, he didn’t!!!!
He's the sharpest one on the floor by a mile
Sally Vix wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
And you still wonder why you’re called a raging moron and a$$hole every day?
I am fit as a fiddle Troll. Maybe you are okay with letting yourself go - I am not. So if you want our congressladies weighing 300 pounds then that is what you like.
It’s a little weird to be obsessing about her looks don’t you think? Haven’t seen you voice this kind of superficial criticism of your orange goddess. Usually I hear women scrutinizing other women’s looks.
That’s all they’ve got is personal attack. And there are several more looking at prison time once things change; every reason to try anything but the truth.
Sally Vix wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Trump has access to the same things.
Indeed Aztec. Both do and both look like crap.
I read somewhere that Trump didn't want a child with Melania and his requirement for her, were they to have a child, was that she lose the excess weight in record time, which is a lot to ask considering she also had to have sex with him. It's obvious he didn't own a mirror at the time
Fat boy bet everything on social media, now it’s destroying him. This is fun.
agip wrote:
Trumpism.
https://twitter.com/JohnBrennan/status/1219711072233500673?s=20
Yep, that's reality...
Philbin following up w/ argument that Dems didn't show up with the evidence that the WH blocked so oh well.
Trollminator wrote:
agip wrote:
Trumpism.
https://twitter.com/JohnBrennan/status/1219711072233500673?s=20Yep, that's reality...
Philbin following up w/ argument that Dems didn't show up with the evidence that the WH blocked so oh well.
This is actually insane, their defense against accusations that trump abused his power for personal gain is to blame the House for not being able to extract additional evidence.
Rigged actually could have done better than Cippollone.
Trollminator wrote:
This is actually insane, their defense against accusations that trump abused his power for personal gain is to blame the House for not being able to extract additional evidence.
Still puzzling... they are alleging the Senate has no role in hearing additional evidence. Lets analyze this through an example. You are a plaintiff in a case and you are accusing another person of burglary. Your neighbor was a witness to the crime but they were initially afraid of speaking up as they were being threatened by the defendant. The witness decides to do their duty and becomes available on the day of the trial to give their account. You and the defendant show up for the trial and you tell the judge that you have the willingness witness. The defendant says not fair because you didn't deliver the witnesses account to the court beforehand, even though the defendant knows they prevented that from happening and knows they can decide to let the witness be heard. Is this fair?
L L wrote:
https://politics.theonion.com/kellyanne-conway-suggests-martin-luther-king-jr-would-1841137797
The lowest of the low she is...
Lost Little Girl. Age-inappropriate, Kellyanne.
jesseriley wrote:
Fat boy bet everything on social media, now it’s destroying him. This is fun.
Not so fast....
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/impeachment-increasing-support-for-trumpjesseriley wrote:
Agree, pubs only strategy is to end this before some kind of trial breaks out - but they don’t have the votes.
Wanna bet on that?
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jan/20/inside-the-beltway-oddsmakers-senate-wont-convict-/Sally and friends, tell me again why you don’t want any documents or witnesses to testify?
How is this ok in your mind?
The real Pookie Washington wrote:
Sally and friends, tell me again why you don’t want any documents or witnesses to testify?
How is this ok in your mind?
The House already impeached Trump. That is their duty. They had the opportunity to gather whatever evidence they felt necessary. They had the opportunity to have whichever witnesses they wanted to testify. They essentially indicted Trump. Impeachment is similar to an indictment in which formal charges are alleged against a defendant. In this case the president has been accused of bribery, treason or other high crimes or misdemeanors. Once impeached, the articles of impeachment are transmitted to the Senate who decides whether the president is innocent of the charges, thereby acquitting him or her, or is guilty as charged. Nancy Pelosi already has said the evidence is overwhelming. She and the rest of her Dems in the House rushed the impeachment for political reasons. They had ample opportunity for additional witnesses or testimony. The articles were sent to the Senate and the Senate now decides the fate of the president. Why are additional witnesses or testimony necessary? The evidence is overwhelming. I DO agree that the evidence and testimony from the House impeachment should be availed to the Senate. They can then use that evidence and testimony to decide the president's guilt or innocence. NO NEED for additional evidence or testimony. Pelosi already said no additional evidence or testimony was needed. The president's guilt was obvious. The Senate merely needs to examine the evidence and decide if the president is guilty or innocent. As simple as that.
The real Pookie Washington wrote:
Sally and friends, tell me again why you don’t want any documents or witnesses to testify?
How is this ok in your mind?
Pookie - Would you support the whistleblower or Hunter Biden testifying? Yes?
If your strategy is based on everyone becoming gambling addicts, I’m sure these news items are quite comforting.
Sally Vix wrote:
The real Pookie Washington wrote:
Sally and friends, tell me again why you don’t want any documents or witnesses to testify?
How is this ok in your mind?
The House already impeached Trump. That is their duty. They had the opportunity to gather whatever evidence they felt necessary. They had the opportunity to have whichever witnesses they wanted to testify.
were you asleep? Trump ordered exec branch people not to testify, and for the most part they did not. So no, the Congress could not have 'whichever witnesses they wanted to testify.'
Trump ordered the exec branch not to supply any documents. They did not supply any documents. So no, the Congress could not have 'whatever evidence they felt necessary.'
You know this but you say it anyway. you are a troll.