Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

This rally is peaceful no matter how desperate the media is wishing for the opposite.

That's pretty sick to wish for violence.

White supremacists have already been arrested on the way to Richmond so there is a fear to who has made it there without being arrested.

If you don't think I should post then stop replying to me.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

If Senile Quid Pro Joe wins the nomination, Trump is going to absolutely destroy him in every single debate.

I'm not the first to opine that Donald Trump would be a fool to engage in debates. He has literally nothing IMO to gain from them.

You KNOW he would make a misstatement or ten--not necessarily from any kind of bad motive, but just because that's what he does. And the various media are getting better and better about fact-checking in real time; his falsehoods might be trumpeted even while the debate is in progress.

He's the President. He has the bully pulpit. He'll get tremendous media coverage--probably even more than the estimated $2 billion worth of free pub that they gave him in 2016--just by being President and campaigning. Why should he share that with the Dem candidate? Why debate the Dem candidate and make it appear, even momentarily, that s/he is on his level?

Trollminator wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/20/politics/alan-dershowitz-trump-defense-criminal-like-conduct/index.html

Irrelevant--the President *has* committed crimes.

present, esq. wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/20/politics/alan-dershowitz-trump-defense-criminal-like-conduct/index.html

Irrelevant--the President *has* committed crimes.

https://theintercept.com/2019/10/10/trump-crimes-law/

Remember, the standard has shifted.. in the dystopian trump present a potus has only only done something wrong if his party says so.

Wrong, I’m a liberal and I care that he wore black face.

L L wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

This rally is peaceful no matter how desperate the media is wishing for the opposite.

That's pretty sick to wish for violence.

White supremacists have already been arrested on the way to Richmond so there is a fear to who has made it there without being arrested.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/men-discussed-opening-fire-at-pro-gun-rally-in-richmond-officials-say-11579291691

If you don't think I should post then stop replying to me.

Shut up, you racist piece of trash.

You’re supposed to be banned!!!!!

Totally lacking in integrity.

Trollminator wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Your boy stutters, loses his train of thought when making a point and goes off on incoherent tangents. His brain is toast and Trump going wipe the floor with him.

You were saying...

https://twitter.com/i/status/1098921008684126208https://twitter.com/i/status/1210385911994814464https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9kX3ZFFtbohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5HHZI_pe3whttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lHDI2fbNmE

An absolute embarrassment ??

Treadhead wrote:

An absolute embarrassment ??

Remember how everyone couldn't wait until Bush jr GTFO of dodge? He was Einstein and Superman combined compared to impotus.

Our prez isn't the only embarrassment... I found Gary in the crowd.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EOutyP0W4AAuwvB?format=jpg&name=small

Treadhead wrote:

Wrong, I’m a liberal and I care that he wore black face.

You don't care that he still kept his job.

Purdue is 100% Trumper. You can cross him off your list.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Treadhead wrote:

Wrong, I’m a liberal and I care that he wore black face.

You don't care that he still kept his job.

Wrong AGAIN, I do.

agip wrote:

Even the NYT edit board, which really doesn't like Biden, agrees that the 'biden is senile' claim is complete nonsense. They went out of their way to say biden was all there. Dude is sharp. But is not a good debater. Dont' confuse the two.

Biden used to be a very, very good debater.

Biden is not senile, but he has definitely lost a step or two rhetorically.

Why did the House not charge Trump with an impeachable crime spelled out in the Constitution? Bribery or treason because you still have members of the House saying that Trump committed bribery. Why did they go with such vague articles of Impeachment as Abuse of power and Obstruction of Justice? I saw member of Congress as recently saying he committed bribery but he was never charged with that. Abuse of power - any president could be charged with such a vague accusation especially when they are political hacks that the House Dems currently are. Obstruction of Justice - Seriously?

Also, Jerry Nadler refused a quid pro quo. He insists on the Senate Repubs allowing possible damning witnesses to Trump but refused to offer up Hunter Biden. If Hunter has been cleared (and THAT IS A BIG-TIME LIE) just let him testify and his innocence will be borne through. What are all Dems so afraid of Hunter testifying? Oh, maybe it would be the end of the Joe Biden presidential campaign? LOL - Yeah - I think that too. We both agree. Uncle Joe has too many skeletons in his closet.

Sally Vix wrote:

He insists on the Senate Repubs allowing possible damning witnesses to Trump but refused to offer up Hunter Biden.

What's strange is that no one has offered or called for Trump to testify under oath. Of course he'd probably perjure himself before he could finish taking the oath.

Next witness please wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

He insists on the Senate Repubs allowing possible damning witnesses to Trump but refused to offer up Hunter Biden.

What's strange is that no one has offered or called for Trump to testify under oath. Of course he'd probably perjure himself before he could finish taking the oath.

His handlers would never allow that no matter how much Trump would love to testify. Perjury is one of the most easily proved crimes.

Trollminator wrote:

Treadhead wrote:

An absolute embarrassment ??

Remember how everyone couldn't wait until Bush jr GTFO of dodge? He was Einstein and Superman combined compared to impotus.

Agreed. I have such a different view of him now that we have this idiot nightmare in the White House.

Sally Vix wrote:

Next witness please wrote:

What's strange is that no one has offered or called for Trump to testify under oath. Of course he'd probably perjure himself before he could finish taking the oath.

His handlers would never allow that no matter how much Trump would love to testify. Perjury is one of the most easily proved crimes when you are trump the chronic liar.

Fixed your post and would add that he was giving his former counsel a very hard time about not letting him speak to Mueller, claiming he would quickly clear himself...