Democrats are Iran lovers!!!!
That’s disgusting!!!!!
All democrats should be rounded up and charged with treason!!!!
Since I didn’t believe you were from Ontario as you said, perhaps you can prove me right by not mourning the 63 Canadians who died in the Tehran airliner crash last night. Fog of War & all that...
176 lives lost, no one will take credit for that, but we can guess the truth.
Sally Hicks wrote:
UsedToBeKnowItAll wrote:
I don't see how this can be seen as anything but a huge win for Trump, and I hate Trump. Takes out a major leader of terrorism in the middle east in exchange for a couple bombed runways in Iraq? Great exchange. I still think it was ridiculously risky and I didn't support it, but it turned out much better than I expected.
Iran were complying with the nuclear treaty, they have now fully withdrawn and will very possible build nuclear arms.
If you look at the bigger picture, this is not a success at all.
Trump ordering Soleimani be killed is looking better and better by the minute. No Americans died last night in return and it appears there will be no war with Iran. If that’s how this ends, how can anyone criticize the decision to kill Soleimani without looking like an idiot?
Trump wins again.
America first!
KAG2020
Patriotic American wrote:
Democrats are Iran lovers!!!!
That’s disgusting!!!!!
All democrats should be rounded up and charged with treason!!!!
You are asking for more than half the voting population to be incarcerated.
Looks like Trump completely took the Iranian leadership to the woodshed and whipped their behinds. He has the second-most senior governmental figure and the most despised terrorist in the world killed. Iran responds by, drumroll please, by bombing some concrete structures. No American injuries. No nothing except this terrorist who Obama should have taken out many years ago is now rotting in hell. I would say Trump 1 Iran 0.
fentrekker wrote:
Patriotic American wrote:
Democrats are Iran lovers!!!!
That’s disgusting!!!!!
All democrats should be rounded up and charged with treason!!!!
You are asking for more than half the voting population to be incarcerated.
You have just described the method by which we can change the system. The government can't arrest and incarcerate that many people.
If you get enough people in the streets you have a very good chance of driving whatever change you are looking for.
This is how the civil rights movement played out. So many people started showing up at rallies and committing acts of civil disobedience that it forced the government's hand.
But you have to get a critical mass of people in the streets. Research suggests that the number is about 3.5% of the population. And that same research shows that non-violent civil resistance works twice as often as violent revolutions.
Check out Dr. Erica Chenoweth if you are interested.
That’s right, no war & no arrests of foreign agents! Sally has achieved another day of freedom.
Fat hurts wrote:
fentrekker wrote:
You are asking for more than half the voting population to be incarcerated.
You have just described the method by which we can change the system. The government can't arrest and incarcerate that many people.
If you get enough people in the streets you have a very good chance of driving whatever change you are looking for.
This is how the civil rights movement played out. So many people started showing up at rallies and committing acts of civil disobedience that it forced the government's hand.
But you have to get a critical mass of people in the streets. Research suggests that the number is about 3.5% of the population. And that same research shows that non-violent civil resistance works twice as often as violent revolutions.
Check out Dr. Erica Chenoweth if you are interested.
So, you are suggesting that after the Mueller investigation did not bring down Trump and the impeachment is not going to bring down Trump, you are now advocating wide-spread protests in the streets? Are you that deranged that you are pretty much advocating riots simply you hate Trump? Disgusting.
Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
You have just described the method by which we can change the system. The government can't arrest and incarcerate that many people.
If you get enough people in the streets you have a very good chance of driving whatever change you are looking for.
This is how the civil rights movement played out. So many people started showing up at rallies and committing acts of civil disobedience that it forced the government's hand.
But you have to get a critical mass of people in the streets. Research suggests that the number is about 3.5% of the population. And that same research shows that non-violent civil resistance works twice as often as violent revolutions.
Check out Dr. Erica Chenoweth if you are interested.
So, you are suggesting that after the Mueller investigation did not bring down Trump and the impeachment is not going to bring down Trump, you are now advocating wide-spread protests in the streets? Are you that deranged that you are pretty much advocating riots simply you hate Trump? Disgusting.
Fat Hurts - you are really effed up.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Sally Hicks wrote:
Iran were complying with the nuclear treaty, they have now fully withdrawn and will very possible build nuclear arms.
If you look at the bigger picture, this is not a success at all.
Trump ordering Soleimani be killed is looking better and better by the minute. No Americans died last night in return and it appears there will be no war with Iran. If that’s how this ends, how can anyone criticize the decision to kill Soleimani without looking like an idiot?
Trump wins again.
America first!
KAG2020
This is like your theory that nothing was lost by appeasing Kim and posing for photos with him. 1) Trump broke one of his election promises 2) Thousands more were deployed to the region - a sign that obviously we've made things worse and need to put even more americans at risk 3) Trump ensured that no diplomatic solution will be found 4) Trump ensured that Iran will build a nuke and 5) Trump is of course continuing to help destabilize the region. So no, it's looking more and more like a really ego driven move that backfired and could have been catastrophic. Of course for you this statement means all Dems and Liberals support terrorists, but then again no one expects you to have any functioning neurons.
Okay, you wannabe grammarian ...
Note that "widespread" is one word.
As for "simply you hate Trump" it's not clear what you were going for there.
More importantly, however, it's time to admit that Trump's foreign policy is ineffective at best, and wildly dangerous at worst. Do you really think that Iran and its agents will now stand down?
So, you are suggesting that after the Mueller investigation did not bring down Trump and the impeachment is not going to bring down Trump, you are now advocating wide-spread protests in the streets? Are you that deranged that you are pretty much advocating riots simply you hate Trump? Disgusting.
And those figures are based on likely voters. Children who die from inadequate support are just as dead because their parents vote or don’t vote. Same with elderly, not everyone votes, but they have a right to a politicians who support their basic welfare.
C0l0rado wrote:
Okay, you wannabe grammarian ...
Note that "widespread" is one word.
As for "simply you hate Trump" it's not clear what you were going for there.
More importantly, however, it's time to admit that Trump's foreign policy is ineffective at best, and wildly dangerous at worst. Do you really think that Iran and its agents will now stand down?
So, you are suggesting that after the Mueller investigation did not bring down Trump and the impeachment is not going to bring down Trump, you are now advocating wide-spread protests in the streets? Are you that deranged that you are pretty much advocating riots simply you hate Trump? Disgusting.
My bad - I know widespread is one word and I goofed. Even the Babe would whiff every now and then.
C0l0rado wrote:
Okay, you wannabe grammarian ...
Note that "widespread" is one word.
As for "simply you hate Trump" it's not clear what you were going for there.
More importantly, however, it's time to admit that Trump's foreign policy is ineffective at best, and wildly dangerous at worst. Do you really think that Iran and its agents will now stand down?
So, you are suggesting that after the Mueller investigation did not bring down Trump and the impeachment is not going to bring down Trump, you are now advocating wide-spread protests in the streets? Are you that deranged that you are pretty much advocating riots simply you hate Trump? Disgusting.
Trump's foreign policies so far have prevented any wars. It seems like he is doing an amazing job.
Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:
C0l0rado wrote:
Okay, you wannabe grammarian ...
Note that "widespread" is one word.
As for "simply you hate Trump" it's not clear what you were going for there.
More importantly, however, it's time to admit that Trump's foreign policy is ineffective at best, and wildly dangerous at worst. Do you really think that Iran and its agents will now stand down?
So, you are suggesting that after the Mueller investigation did not bring down Trump and the impeachment is not going to bring down Trump, you are now advocating wide-spread protests in the streets? Are you that deranged that you are pretty much advocating riots simply you hate Trump? Disgusting.
Trump's foreign policies so far have prevented any wars. It seems like he is doing an amazing job.
That’s like saying Trump’s domestic policy so far hasn’t resulted in any white supremacists engaging in mass lynchings.
UsedToBeKnowItAll wrote:
I don't see how this can be seen as anything but a huge win for Trump, and I hate Trump. Takes out a major leader of terrorism in the middle east in exchange for a couple bombed runways in Iraq? Great exchange. I still think it was ridiculously risky and I didn't support it, but it turned out much better than I expected.
Only morons will believe Trump when he says this is a win. Did you see the millions of Iranians so worked up with hate that they killed each in a stampede? How many of those Iranians will become terrorists?
This attack weakened our position in Iraq. This is not over, an act of war is never a win. The man we killed wasn't just associated with a terrorist group, like bin Laden, he was a general in another country.
Trollminator wrote:
Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:
Trump's foreign policies so far have prevented any wars. It seems like he is doing an amazing job.
That’s like saying Trump’s domestic policy so far hasn’t resulted in any white supremacists engaging in mass lynchings.
Trump is pro-Israel. The most hate crimes committed are against Jews. Is he at fault for those? They guy can't catch a break from you Trump haters. No matter what he does you will be critical of him and hate him. Will you ever take a step back and say - "hey, he has been doing some good!"
Trollminator wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Trump ordering Soleimani be killed is looking better and better by the minute. No Americans died last night in return and it appears there will be no war with Iran. If that’s how this ends, how can anyone criticize the decision to kill Soleimani without looking like an idiot?
Trump wins again.
America first!
KAG2020
This is like your theory that nothing was lost by appeasing Kim and posing for photos with him. 1) Trump broke one of his election promises 2) Thousands more were deployed to the region - a sign that obviously we've made things worse and need to put even more americans at risk 3) Trump ensured that no diplomatic solution will be found 4) Trump ensured that Iran will build a nuke and 5) Trump is of course continuing to help destabilize the region. So no, it's looking more and more like a really ego driven move that backfired and could have been catastrophic. Of course for you this statement means all Dems and Liberals support terrorists, but then again no one expects you to have any functioning neurons.
+1