Fat hurts wrote:
Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:
People were certain Richard Jewell committed "his" crimes. How did that end up for you rush-to-judgementers?
Jewell was never even indicted or charged. And I never passed judgement on him.
Tiny was indicted with overwhelming evidence. Tiny has offered no evidence in his defense. Worse than that, Tiny has blocked the testimony of people who could easily testify that he didn't do it.
He committed those crimes.
Why would it be bad that "Tiny" has not offered evidence in his defense? Does the presumption of evidence not apply to the "Orange one?"