Charlie Kirk killed at campus event in Utah

Can you provide a single instance in which Kirk espoused "violent speech."?

In fairness, I am not sure what "violent speech" is. Sounds like nonsensical double-speak that equates an opposing view to violence. I am open to be proven wrong though.

What he said was

“I want to send our support and our deepest sympathies to the victims and families touched by the terrible school shooting yesterday in Perry, Iowa,” Trump said during a campaign rally.
“It’s just horrible, so surprising to see it here. But have to get over it, we have to move forward,” he added.

You people are f*cked in the head.

I read this to admitting all of these liberal dumbf**ks are simply incompetent and cannot successfully complete an assignment🤣. With all of their education, I simply cannot comprehend this🤔. Is this what you are saying?

As ordered by Trump.

Want a pedestrian example?
Taylor Swift submit to your husband!
like, you can read that and laugh it off, but he’s preaching oppression and coercion.
His gun views and careless views towards victims of gun violence is inherently promoting and tacitly approving of violence
Even ADolt speaks violently. He wants the Democratic Party destroyed. Like how? Kill them? What does he mean?

There are myriad examples. Kirk poorly veils his violent speech and people like you won’t think twice about it

Which is all the proof we need to be sure that this was a false flag operation, intended to gin up hate for liberals and trans people, while at the same time distracting from the fact that Trump is a pedophile and the Guardians of Pedohiles (GOP) party is covering for him.

Right Wing Violence!

You love a misleading stat, don't you? I think a big problem you've got (and your angry little pal on this thread) is that you don't have many (any?) friends and you don't really talk to many people in the real world.

It leaves you with this false sense of your own high intelligence, particularly compared to those you're arguing with.

Counties won? Really? Come on man.

You people have me agreeing with Adult and I almost never agree with him. Kirk was like a glorified debate kid in high school. He would go to campuses and invite people to change his mind. He sometimes had his mind changed. I didn't follow him closely because I am not terminally rage clicking, but I too would like to see instances of his alleged hate speech.

I looked into his comment on empathy and people are taking it totally out of context. All you need is the next line, which was "Sympathy is a better word, because empathy means you are actually feeling what another person felt, and no one can't feel what another person feels."

I know this will change no one's mind, but it is important context. Please provide examples of him being evil.

1 apple > 6 raisins

That somebody doesn’t represent anyone besides himself. Yeah, someone will pick up the slack, but it will have no effect on the left. It’s appalling that Kirk was murdered, but the story will run its course and politics will go on as before.

I've merged this thread with the original Kirk shooting thread.

The details matter. Why do you have to make things up and rely on exaggerations?

I have no problem with you criticizing their use of “fascist” or deciding that it’s irresponsible for them to say “democracy is at stake.” Irresponsible hyperbole is OK for you, but I realize that they should be held to a higher standard because they are asking the citizenry to trust them. They purport to be leaders. they have much greater reach.

Nevertheless, that’s vastly, vastly, vastly different from wanting Civil War.

No matter whom you would consider the winner of the war, America would lose the war, and enemies of America would win the war.

And it takes a solid bit of delusion to bypass the thought of parents explaining to their children why their neighbors had to be murdered for the greater good.

And you have an overly optimistic sense of how America’s rivals on the global stage would be bolstered while American prospects diminish through the loss of the trust of our allies, and through the lengthy process of building back out of the rubble and the much longer and less likely process of trying to restore some semblance of social cohesion.

You talk about the mental instability of leftists. Any talk of Civil War arises from deep and unsettling instability.

Your party has a 19% approval rating and you think anyone who doesnt agree with you doesnt live in the real world.

LOL

The lack of self awareness in your post is hysterical.

Youre the idiot living in a bubble.

It's pretty relevant that 85% of the counties in the country disagree with you.

There is only a limited amount of people you can crap on for living and only a limited time untill you get hurt. I guess, his time just came.

At the same time, the powers from the right sector can't be excluded from suspects here. Gaining traction with larger audiences can make someone powerful jelous and uncomfortable.

Charlie Kirk taught me that empathy is a disease. I'm not upset at his death or the pain his family is going through.

Both parties are filled with whack jobs and extremists.

Have we forgotten about Minnesota House Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman who was assassinated in her home alongside her husband Mark in a politically motivated attack by a far-right extremist on June 14?

What about what happened to Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, a Democrat whose home was attacked and set ablaze in April while his family slept inside?

Shapiro did have this to say about the assassination of Kirk: "Political violence has no place in our country. We must speak with moral clarity. The attack on Charlie Kirk is horrifying and this growing type of unconscionable violence cannot be allowed in our society".

Shapiro is right. None of this has any place but anyone that believe that both parties don't have extremists, as is being suggested by somme in this thread, is being dishonest.

Why so much all or nothing?