Regina Jacobs the Greatest American female distance runner EVER!

JET-SON!!!!

You again, "Vipam"? Well, I am loathe to embarrass you further and unintentionally lead you you think that I am attacking you in some unknown way again, so please don't cry, but if you look really, really, REALLY closely, you'll see that I had included the term "aside" at the end of that passage, indicating that rather than make "issues regarding your struggles with the English language", a point of contention like other contributors to this board have done, that I was recognizing their existence yet choosing to skip over them and instead address the substance at hand.

It's clear from your COMPLETE AND UTTER FAILURE to address any of the questions that you don't have the time (or is it capability?) to engage in an honest discussion on the topic.

I will give you one final chance to redeem yourself by re-posting them below.

"Is it logical to assume that anyone or everyone who tests negatively does not ever nor have ever used banned performance enhancing substances and is therefore 'proven innocent'? Is it logical to assume that the system is without flaw? Please explain why. Also, is it fair to the truly clean athletes, and to the sport and its fans for that matter, that rival cheaters escape detection and punishment?"

What's your daughter Judy been up to, Jetson?

Cosgrove Jackass

For someone who want to appear so smart, your last sentence does not make any sense. Yes it is true that there are individuals who are dirty and test negative, yes it is true the test(s) have a window for error; however, with all that said and done how can you tell if one is clean or not?

So until a cheater is tested positive, we have no way of knowing if the clean athletes are competing against dirty ones!

Just curious do you weigh yourself by tons or pounds? Is your IQ as high as you think it is?

Hmmmm

Except Regina underwent testing at the Oly Trials and she also underwent testing in setting the WR (mandatory for any record performance).

I think it could be Anna Kournikova (if she would just change sports).

Regina can't hold a candle to me and Cosgrove knows it.

There must be a level playing field in some of the critic

on Regina Jacobs; therefore, if it is safe to ASSUME Regina is dirty than its also safe to ASSUME Suzy "Webble Wobble and I'm Going to Fall Down" Hamilton and the GREAT Paula Radcliffe are also!

The majority of the accusations against Regina are unfounded and based soley upon speculation! I guess it will be more to talk about when she runs sub 3:57 outdoors in 2003! Is it possible she's on drugs, yes-but I personally don't think so.

Vipam

WOW!did anyone see this post? Whoda thunk that?

The surprise Regina spoke is surely to be in the 3000m and I am guessing she has in mind the World Record and not the American Record. Lets she what happens, it would be nice if she informed everyone of her intentions before the race!

b-u-m-p.

Anyone that thought I was clean is an idiot.

wait for it.

I hate to rain on your parade...

Who the hell says that?

Another example of how worthless Vipam's posts are.....

Bump

Well does anybody believe that Regina is the greatest American female distance runner? Anybody. How about Regina's mom? Regina herself. Vipam?

Does anyone know how her new real estate career is going?

Regina is a drug cheat....her accomplishments are due to her cheating. Only Regina can run 4:00 flat and 4 weeks later barely run 4:45 in a road mile. hmmm ...really a great female distance runner.

Vipam seems to think differently, however. What are his thoughts on this subject? Or is he too intellectually coward to admit that he foolishly defended a drug cheat.

Loser.