such is the bias wrote:
Why don't people refer to anti-life instead of pro-choice?
Why don't people refer to pro-life as anti-choice? Why don't people refer to pro religious freedom as anti human rights? We can play this fun little game any number of ways
My comment was in reference to a prior post within the thread, Mr/Mrs. "your too dumb."
Insane Dolt wrote:
ISBN wrote:4) EL G ran fast times, close to WR times, not once or twice during a 2 or 3 year peak period, but on a regular, fort nightly basis, throughout a season, for many seasons. His rate of recovery has never been seen before or since. It was super human.
Fallacious. Allah placed his hands upon El Guerrouj to honor The Almighty's Glory.
You racists are obsessed.
Sleepy wrote:
Before 1985 for sure-per one of their sprinters in the early 1970's the Russians were already requiring their sprinters who wanted to compete on their national team to take steroids. That's probably how Valery Borzov came out of nowhere.
I don't know if the claim about steroids is true, but Borzov hardly came out of nowhere.
http://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/athletes/bo/valeriy-borzov-1.htmlRevolutionaryThinker wrote:
Some say he did, some say he didn't, but with Kiprop's potential to take down his 18-year-old record, I think it's time we ask this question again:
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=1915626&page=1What do his records mean for distance running? What, if he gets it, will Kiprop's?
His records mean that the IAAF went as far as trying to scrub away the entire history of track up to the year he retired.
If Kiprop had broken his record it would have meant that Kiprop had paid his testers their tea money on time.
So many people in this thread think absence of evidence is evidence of absence.
It’s like saying: I didn’t see the sun today, therefore there is no sun.
Take a maths class, FFS.
The overwhelming body of evidence suggests he doped. To think that the fact that he never tested positive constitutes proof that he’s clean is just dumb.
(He could be clean but it’s highly highly unlikely)
This post was removed.
dumb argument wrote:
skeptical? wrote:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XvCsj7eJKKAWatch this race. Unreal. Specifically watch after he finishes...not even tired!!!
neither is the second place guy......
Look at Steve Cram after his WR - not looking tired either:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXn6fbdsFKMSorry but whether someone looks tired after a middle distance race should not be a method to evaluate doping allegations - period!
This is Cram being interviewed at least 2 minutes after the race, visibly fatigued and breathing hard.