ventolin^3 wrote:
Fundamentally wrote:Are you purposely obtuse?are you purposely stoopid ???
You clearly have comprehension problems
better than dumb
Faster than a 46.9 relay leg does not mean 45 flat open ability
learn fool
3'55.8 on quagmire
3'51.3 on dry dirt soon after
therefore a 46.9 440y likely in ballpark of 45.9 440y on dry dirt
that with fatigue of a near intrinsic 2s wr in the mile earlier in day & still 18y !!!
that is 45-flat open on synthetic when fully rested
Did J Ryun say that he was a 45 flat, 1:39 man?
fool
he has probably never even thought about it
If you can't see the huge gulf between the 2 then you have nothing of relevance to offer
drivel
learn even cursory analysis
you offer nothing
Are you really using this as evidence?
It doesn't mean he ran to his limit when running his 3:55 mile. You assume he was trying to run his fastest and that the conditions slowed him down by 4 secs, as he ran a 3:51 weeks later. It was a low level meet for a start and there is no reason for him trying to run his fastest. You therefore cannot use the fact he ran 4 secs faster from one track to another as any sort of evidence that this means his 400m would be 1/4 faster. Lol. I can't believe that you are seriously suggesting such a tenuous link as any sort of evidence.
It is also not a fact that the track was a 'quagmire', this is your own embellished description based on bias, and where is the research/ analysis that it would have slowed him down by 2 secs as you fantasise about?
Your entire fantasy is based on tenuous supposition, exaggeration and opinion. There is not a shred of factual evidence whatsoever.
Yes we all agree that Ryun was capable of much faster on synthetic and with ideal conditions. But the nonsense you use to bring him down to being capable of 45.0, 1:39, 3:24, 3:41 is absolutely hysterical. There is no one who ever lived and probably no one who ever will in the next 50 years that is capable of such times.
You do not live in any sort of real world.
