Pete Carroll is apparently a 9/11 truther

Why do you even comment? "Hey everybody!, I'm successful guy! I was there! It was definitely 19 arab guys with box cutters. Trust me!"

Leon Trollsky wrote:

Why do you even comment? "Hey everybody!, I'm successful guy! I was there! It was definitely 19 arab guys with box cutters. Trust me!"

I just fact checked your first claim and it is completely wrong. So I won't check the rest since you have no credibility.

1) the insurance policy was taken out a year before, not a few weeks.

2) was made out for less than the value. Why would he insure for less if he knew?

3) and, let's just say that the towers had ALREADY BEEN BOMBED ONCE (in 1993)! wouldn't you, um, want to insure against a second attack?

As for your ability to judge a guy via his statements on tv - well, more power to you. You are a true genius and should no doubt make millions playing poker.

More later maybe.

K5 wrote:

TAA wrote:

2/10

I almost responded seriously.

How about the Third Tower that was not struck, that was reported as having collapsed on TV before it had. You know, the one we have a recording of Silverstein saying "pull it" about? R U going to almost respond seriously about that?

The New York Fire Department knew it was going to collapse and the BBC jumped the gun in reporting it. Even if it was the government, do you think they would just tell the BBC too early?

Several fight fighters died trying to put out the massive fire in WTC 7. Both the Fire Department and Silverstein knew the building was going to collapse. Here's the whole quote: "I remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me they were not sure they were going to be able to control the fire. I said 'You know we've had such terrible lose of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull."

personally, I think the British royal family was behind 9/11 -- sarah ferguson was very very conveniently LATE to work that day at her office in the twin towers. ha. Like I am stupid enough to believe that concoction!

The Duchess of York, Sarah Ferguson was in New York City on September 11, 2001. She was in NBC studios being interviewed by Matt Lauer when the first plane hit. Lauer later recalled he was told by his director that a plane had just hit the WTC, and they would be cutting away from the interview with Ferguson. Ferguson’s charity, “Chances for Children,” was located on the 101st floor of 1 World Trade Center. She was scheduled to be in the building with the charity but she was running late. None of the charity’s employees were trapped in the building, but nearly 700 employees of Cantor Fitzgerald, the financial firm providing free office space to the duchess’ charity, were killed in the aftermath of the attack.

abandon hope wrote:

At least birthers have faded away.

We're still around. I'm a convicted Birther and I know others in real life.

So, you believe a real estate guy over literally 1000's of architects, engineers, and physicists that disagree this can happen? I'll put my money on the science side.

The building's vertical support gave way at virtually the exact same time. This was not a small structure... as a matter of fact, only a small portion of the building received structural support damage. A MAJORITY of vertical support DID NOT suffer ANY damage, whatsoever.

Other surrounding structures that also received impact damage DID NOT go down.

And the term "pull it" is commonly used in demolition circles... there is PLENTY of video evidence and demolition expert testimony to support this.

The reason that people mislabel conspiracies is because they don't understand them. The REAL reason for the JFK murder and 9/11 is NOT the government vs. the people it is man vs. woman! If you watch the high resolution video of the Zapruder film you will see that JACKIE KENNEDY shoots JFK in the head! She was DURGA the Hindu God that is summoned when the Devil (JFK) is out of control. 9/11 is the "unveiling of Isis" (the Statue of liberty is Isis). The USA then invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, two countries where woman are treated badly. "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned!"

Hey dumbo, here is VIDEO of a F4 Phantom traveling at 500mph into a concrete wall. It completely disintegrates...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZjhxuhTmGk

Yes

Larry Silverstein wrote:

Hey dumbo, here is VIDEO of a F4 Phantom traveling at 500mph into a concrete wall. It completely disintegrates...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZjhxuhTmGk

Right, so all of the passengers that died on the 757 that hit the Pentagon were just made up. You're sick.

When I saw the subject of this thread, I knew it would devolve into adiscussion about what "really happened" on September 11. When posters say they "don't believe in conspiracy theories, but.." what inevitably follows is a far fetched conspiracy theory.

Whether it's the September 11 attack, the JFK assassination, or any other subject, we should always ask ourselves one question when anyone puts forth a conspiracy theory: how many people would have to have inside knowledge of the conspiracy and keep it secret in order to pull it off? If that number is more than ahalf dozen, it's a safe bet the purported conspiracy never happened.

I once met a woman who believed the entire Apollo lunar landing program was a hoax and the entire thing was staged on a Hollywood film lot. Let's consider this: who would have had to be on the inside of this hoax? Thousands of NASA employees, Congressmen and their staffs, hundreds of administrators in the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations, hundreds in the news media, hundreds more in Hollywood and countless others. Now, 45 years later, not one of these people ever leaked word of this hoax.

Now ask the same question about various stories people spout off about the Sept. 11 attacks. Some months after the attacks, a woman told me that on the morning of Sept. 11, not one single Jew showed up for work at the World Trade Center or in nearby buildings. Less than a month later, someone told me the same tale, except said it was Palestinians or Arabs who stayed away. Depending on which version you like, thousands of Jews/Arabs/Palestinians were purportedly tipped off in advance, and not one of them blew the cover up before or after.

I'm not going to stoop to the name calling that is so commonly seen in these threads, but really, let's apply some common sense, and let's not offend thousands of relatives and friends who lost loved ones on that day. Thank you.

I didn't say that. But, since you're so sure of your stance, provide one video that shows an airplane hitting the Pent.

Seriously, with all of the cameras around the Pentagon (80+), including the surrounding businesses, gas stations etc., you should be able to give us one video that clearly shows an airplane striking the building.

Video, please...

A successful guy wrote:

A Truthful guy wrote:

Bolded text is very clearly a false statement.

Further, being in Manhattan at the time does not in any way convey knowledge of who was behind the events of that day or what type of coverup may or may not be in place.

With your post you have proven yourself to have no respect for truth. As such you are an embarrassment to human kind.

0.5/10 ~ this doesn't even merit further comment but I must say you are an awful troller... maybe I shouldn't say awful, I see people falling for poor quality trolling all the time.[

So, in other words you acknowledge that you are a liar and you up the ante by adding in coward as well.

Your words were shown to be lies. Unless of course you care to demonstrate how being in Manhattan that day somehow conveys upon you inside knowledge of how events were planned and carried out. This I would love to hear.

Oh, and one missing bolt would be enough for conspiracy theorists? Sorry, but that does not even pass the laugh test.

Your posts are so stupid that they do not even rise to the level of being wrong.

Lol, it has occurred to you that people interested in a cover-up would be capable of the disinformation required to deceive a deep-thinking farm animal like yourself?

O'Donnell wrote:

When posters say they "don't believe in conspiracy theories, but.." what inevitably follows is a far fetched conspiracy theory.

Why do you and others, like the "abandon hope" guy, have to see everything in black or white?

Questioning is the source of knowledge.

I asked questions hoping to be elucidated. Instead I get called "troofer" and now you say that what follows is a far-fetched conspiracy theory.

Can't you accept that someone may find it hard to believe one thing and yet be open to accept it in face of evidence?

But no one here has provided any evidence regarding my questions.

Please don't label people.

Larry Silverstein wrote:

So, you believe a real estate guy over literally 1000's of architects, engineers, and physicists that disagree this can happen? I'll put my money on the science side.

The building's vertical support gave way at virtually the exact same time. This was not a small structure... as a matter of fact, only a small portion of the building received structural support damage. A MAJORITY of vertical support DID NOT suffer ANY damage, whatsoever.

Other surrounding structures that also received impact damage DID NOT go down.

And the term "pull it" is commonly used in demolition circles... there is PLENTY of video evidence and demolition expert testimony to support this.

The Fire Department, not Silverstein, made the final decision to pull people out.

The building fell from a combination of a couple factors. The portion of the building that did get hit were destroyed and the weight they held had to be shifted to the other supporting columns, which couldn't handle it. The fires in the building were massive and fed by diesel generators in the lower floors of the building. The combination of the fires weakening the support plus the redistributed weight from the damage of the main towers is what caused WTC 7 to collapse. The fire fighters all knew it was going to collapse because it was obvious.

I've already explained the "pull it" conspiracy. It's obvious that Silverstein meant "take the fire fighters out of the building". You really think Silverstein would go on national tv and just say admit to everyone that he brought the tower down with bombs if it was a conspiracy?

Larry Silverstein wrote:

I didn't say that. But, since you're so sure of your stance, provide one video that shows an airplane hitting the Pent.

Seriously, with all of the cameras around the Pentagon (80+), including the surrounding businesses, gas stations etc., you should be able to give us one video that clearly shows an airplane striking the building.

Video, please...

and what is your point, anyway, troofer? a plane didn't hit the pentagon? where are those people then? what happened to the plane?

abandon hope wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzFqXbfv_yg

and what is your point, anyway, troofer? a plane didn't hit the pentagon? where are those people then? what happened to the plane?

Have you seen the size of the explosions on the Towers?

Have you seen the size of the fireworks on the Pentagon, that don't even rock the plastic cones?