Not necessarily wrote:
Somehow, I think that the members of the U.S. mens Olympic basketball team from 1972 would tell you that it is NOT always that simple!
Losers who can't admit they lost are sore losers. Were they cheated for the whole game or just the last moments. If just the last moments, they should have put it away earlier.
Lakers fans are sore losers. They still make excuses about the 2008 NBA Finals and the "weak" Eastern Conference which is better than the Western Conference this year. The 2008 NBA Celtics aren't as good as the 2001 LA Lakers or 1980's Sixers - huh?? That's true and has nothing to do with anything but the 2008 Celtics were better than the 2008 Lakers. Let's make more stupid comparisons, how's this one - the 2009 Lakers aren't as good as the '96 Bulls LoL.
dark knight wrote:
Boston = more wins than LA = higher winning percentage than LA
Boston 28-5, .848
LA Lakers 25-5, .833
You were saying? LoL!!! Losing to the KNICKS by double digits?!? Seriously? On top of that, your boys are 2-4 since Kobe killed their winning streak. Doc Rivers had better look into taking some lessons on how to properly administer the Heimlich Maneuver!!!
dark night, indeed! wrote:
You were saying? LoL!!! Losing to the KNICKS by double digits?!? Seriously?
Is that worse than the Lakers losing to Sacramento by double digits? (Knicks: 13-19, Kings: 8-27)
A for effort wrote:
Is that worse than the Lakers losing to Sacramento by double digits? (Knicks: 13-19, Kings: 8-27)
I notice that you conveniently left out the fact that the Celtics have currently lost 4-out-of-6. Please refresh my memory... when have the Lakers done that this season? ;-)
F for effort wrote:
I notice that you conveniently left out the fact that the Celtics have currently lost 4-out-of-6. Please refresh my memory... when have the Lakers done that this season? ;-)
I don't think they have THIS season. The last time would be the NBA Finals.
Cha-ching!
F for effort wrote:
I notice that you conveniently left out the fact that the Celtics have currently lost 4-out-of-6. Please refresh my memory... when have the Lakers done that this season? ;-)
A for effort wrote:
I don't think they have THIS season. The last time would be the NBA Finals.
Cha-ching!
You're absolutely right. Last year, the Lakers faced a VERY good Celtics team! This year? Not so much.
ow my head wrote:
Not necessarily wrote:Somehow, I think that the members of the U.S. mens Olympic basketball team from 1972 would tell you that it is NOT always that simple!
Losers who can't admit they lost are sore losers. Were they cheated for the whole game or just the last moments. If just the last moments, they should have put it away earlier.
When one is cheated, one did not "lose". By definition. You need to review your terminology
How about you macho men put this conversation on hold till June, when things will be decided.
sdfsd wrote:
How about you macho men put this conversation on hold till June, when things will be decided.
Of course, you're right. Nobody on these boards ever discusses football before the Super Bowl, or for that matter, track & field before the NCAA/USATF meet.
Added perspective wrote:
You're absolutely right. Last year, the Lakers faced a VERY good Celtics team! This year? Not so much.
If the Celtics win at Charlotte tonight, their record will be 30-6. That would match the record through 36 games of last season's "VERY good Celtics team."
terminal wrote:
When one is cheated, one did not "lose". By definition. You need to review your terminology
I suggest you check the medal tables again. Russians won, USA lost... by definition. No problem with my terminology, just your revisionism.
Seriously? Celtics lose to Charlotte? What the hell is wrong with this team? How do you win that many in the row, then lose this much?
Added perspective wrote:
You're absolutely right. Last year, the Lakers faced a VERY good Celtics team! This year? Not so much.
i know wrote:
If the Celtics win at Charlotte tonight, their record will be 30-6. That would match the record through 36 games of last season's "VERY good Celtics team."
But, they DIDN'T! LoL!!!
Added perspective wrote:
But, they DIDN'T! LoL!!!
So they are now 1 game off the pace of last year's very good team (your term). Not bad.
Really Celtics? You lost again? The Rockets are good, but you guys were at home... What the hell is happening?
F for effort wrote:
I notice that you conveniently left out the fact that the Celtics have currently lost 4-out-of-6. Please refresh my memory... when have the Lakers done that this season? ;-)
A for effort wrote:
I don't think they have THIS season. The last time would be the NBA Finals.
Cha-ching!
News flash to Celtic fanatics. Celtics have currently LOST 6-OUT-OF-8. A true figment of their fan's imaginations. So much pain.
Cavaliers now have the best record, for all you Lakers and Celtics fans.
by the way wrote:
Cavaliers now have the best record, for all you Lakers and Celtics fans.
Wow! Are the Cleveland fans just a bit desperate for attention? They held the best record for an entire 3½ hours, until the Lakers won their game tonight. Good job squeezing this post into that tiny little window when the Cavs actually were the best!
HAHAHA. great post hahahaha, and i'm a bulls fan.