Mobile9,I do agree that the era of protection is on its way out but certainly not over with Gatlin's positive. When they busted him at Kansas Relay my first reaction was probably like everyone else, "Wow, that must be a false positive or somebody forgot to tell Justin." After Conte's take I'm now thinking that he failed the “intelligence test” rather than competency by testing authorities.Gatlin's story proves that even up and coming stars can be quickly tainted.Also, as long as the more lucrative sports get a "get out of jail free" card the drug industry will continue thrive, produce and market to new clients.What I'd like to see is more money put into preventive maintenance (i.e., physiological profiles, requiring coaches/handlers/agents to pass sport specific background checks, etc.).Finally, I don't think that Graham and Smith's apples all started out bad. The system created them and will create others unless we get to the root of the problem - which is being able to dope with relative impunity.
the real mobile9 wrote:
Jefe,
You can make whatever claims you like about beating USADA/WADA chemically, but wouldn't you agree that the era of protection is over? The fact that Gatlin tested positive at the goddamn Kansas Relays says as much. I know that USATF has swept things like this under the rug before, but those days are gone, wouldn't you agree?
As far as what comes out in the next few weeks, I doubt if it'll extend much beyond Graham's (and now it's looking like Smith's) stable. I'm sure that Crawford, the Barber girls, LaTasha Collander, etc, are all done. But those are a group of bad apples that are soon to be excised from our sport. There's a new generation of stars that have no links to the old ones and while track is facing up to it's short comings of the last decade, the more lucrative sports (the ones with unions) continue to ignore it.