Tygart says 30% of positives are not intentional

Avocado's Number wrote:

Thank you! The other problem I've had recently is editing my own postings within a designated period of time, but maybe I've just overlooked something.

Spaniardy wrote:

Avocado's Number wrote:

Thank you! The other problem I've had recently is editing my own postings within a designated period of time, but maybe I've just overlooked something.

I have seen in other posts last week that editing still works (the editing comment appears below an edited post).

Let me check. . .

Yes, the "Edit Post" appears at the bottom after posting, and still works (I edited this post twice). Now I see "You have 27 minutes to make edits to this post" below the editing window.

Avocado\'s Number wrote:

Armweaklivs wrote:

Yes. But you wouldn't know that because your idiocy has no limits.

Trying to get the last word in an exchange with "Armstronglivs" is a fruitless endeavor. He seems to have an inexhaustible amount of time on his hands. Some time ago, I blocked all of his postings to avoid the slightest temptation to respond to, or even read, any of his postings, but that feature seems to have been removed from the message board. (If it's still somewhere on the site, I'd appreciate some help in finding it.)

rekrunner wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

So the man in the street is a virtual walking pharmacy of banned performance enhancing drugs. Your idiocy has no limits.

Not just the performance enhancing drugs, but all of the banned non-performance enhancing drugs.

Like you, the common man completely lacks the education about the risk from ordinary everyday things from normal cold remedies to anti-inflammatories to vitamin supplements to teriyaki bowls, etc., that constitutes doping.

Uhhhhh wrote:

TYgart wrote:

In the science of sport podcast at around 1:05:55h Tygart says:

We'll have let's just ballpark 30% of our positive tests and up being innocent source positive - so meat contamination or water or kissing or intimacy or using your roommate's armsleeve or whatever.

Not intentional cheats.

One third of positives just from eating the wrong food or kissing is way higher than I expected it to be.

To be fair: The quote is with regards to regular untargeted testing - for targeted testing after an investigation he estimates that about all of the positives are intentional cheats.

I can't post links, so you'll have to search for it on Spotify yourself .

Rojo, let it go already. You don’t have to keep looking for ways to try to clear SH.

Armstronglivs wrote:

rekrunner wrote:

Not just the performance enhancing drugs, but all of the banned non-performance enhancing drugs.

Like you, the common man completely lacks the education about the risk from ordinary everyday things from normal cold remedies to anti-inflammatories to vitamin supplements to teriyaki bowls, etc., that constitutes doping.

So the ordinary man has access to all these banned drugs without the need for expert medical referral. You never cease to simply make dumb sh*t up.

Armstronglivs wrote:

Avocado\'s Number wrote:

Trying to get the last word in an exchange with "Armstronglivs" is a fruitless endeavor. He seems to have an inexhaustible amount of time on his hands. Some time ago, I blocked all of his postings to avoid the slightest temptation to respond to, or even read, any of his postings, but that feature seems to have been removed from the message board. (If it's still somewhere on the site, I'd appreciate some help in finding it.)

So you admit trying to get the last word is important to you. Keep trying.

Armweaklivs. wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

So the ordinary man has access to all these banned drugs without the need for expert medical referral. You never cease to simply make dumb sh*t up.

You have no idea what you are talking about. You don't know what is banned and what isn't, or in which common medicine some of that stuff can be found.

Armweaklivs. wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

So you admit trying to get the last word is important to you. Keep trying.

No, he is saying you only shut up when people stop talking to you. Getting the last word is vital to you.

Armstronglivs wrote:

Armweaklivs. wrote:

You have no idea what you are talking about. You don't know what is banned and what isn't, or in which common medicine some of that stuff can be found.

I am not the one making the claim that the man in the street is packing away drugs on WADA's banned list. Try to follow the argument.

Armstronglivs wrote:

Armweaklivs. wrote:

No, he is saying you only shut up when people stop talking to you. Getting the last word is vital to you.

As you've just shown it is with you.

Armstronglivs wrote:

Avocado\'s Number wrote:

Trying to get the last word in an exchange with "Armstronglivs" is a fruitless endeavor. He seems to have an inexhaustible amount of time on his hands. Some time ago, I blocked all of his postings to avoid the slightest temptation to respond to, or even read, any of his postings, but that feature seems to have been removed from the message board. (If it's still somewhere on the site, I'd appreciate some help in finding it.)

So you admit trying to get the last word is important to you. Keep trying.

Spaniardy wrote:

Avocado's Number wrote:

Thank you! The other problem I've had recently is editing my own postings within a designated period of time, but maybe I've just overlooked something.

I have seen in other posts last week that editing still works (the editing comment appears below an edited post).

Let me check. . .

Yes, the "Edit Post" appears at the bottom after posting, and still works (I edited this post twice). Now I see "You have 27 minutes to make edits to this post" below the editing window.