"In distance running, patterns matter. Consistency across the season, progression that makes sense, and and transparency are what keep performances believable"
What are you saying? (no caps). Do you read what you write? You should have someone who knows what their talking about proof read your posts. My "CAPS" were meant for you so you can CLEARLY understand what I'm saying. There's is no argument to be had, you're clueless, and what I posted was accurate and true. If your original post had any logic we could then maybe have an intelligent exchange, but it doesn't. The above statement, which has some good points don't apply to Cole Hocker. What "pattern" are you referencing? What "consistency" are you talking about? What "progression" are you talking about?, and finally, what "transparency" are you looking for?
If we were to take your view on Cole Hocker, or any other successful runner, no one would be acknowledged or commended for running well. You would just regurgitate some more reasons not to give them credit. Here's my take, don't forget that this was an extended season which lasted through the middle of September. Training, race scheduling, peaking, etc...had to be adjusted and altered by all of the athletes. Managing a long season which began in January (indoors) for 10 plus months is going to have an effect on "patterns" and "consistency" which directly impacts "progression". Are you still with me? Cole's season, and any other distance runner who showed well in Tokyo were put together so as to work for what's best for them, somewhat unconventional compared to a normal season. With regard to "transparency", I'm not sure where you're going with that. If you're referencing Cole's overall career, you're really clueless and need to go back and do some research. Probably one of the most consistent career progressions of any elite runner.