yxxyyxxy wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
So timing is "nonsense"?
No, but your calculation is.
So the difference between 1:44 and 1:46.4 isn't 2.4 secs? What sort of arithmetic do you use? Counting on your fingers - and still losing count?
There so far has been no proof what the OP is stating is true. So take everything you read with a grain of salt.
yxxyyxxy wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
So timing is "nonsense"?
No, but your calculation is.
So the difference between 1:44 and 1:46.4 isn't 2.4 secs? What sort of arithmetic do you use? Counting on your fingers - and still losing count?
The OP posted a typo. It was a 2:42 1k time trial. Expected underwhelming things in Tokyo.