Ruxton Towers XC wrote:
I agree that the previous women's record was not "in line" with the men's. Given that in every event from the 100m up, the women are 9.5%-10.5% slower, the women's marathon record should have been about 2:12-2:13.
But sub-2:10 is not really in line with anything as far as the numbers go... it is out of this world.
You seem like an intelligent guy. How about you and I have a discussion about the nature of performance improvements?
Because the general discussion is the same old misunderstandings of biology repeated over and over, since before either of us was born and it just reinforces institutionalised ignorance.