Seems utterly random written by someone without much knowledge of or experience with science. Science is not tied to or care about anything other than the scientific method, which implicitly relies on a system of quantification and logical refutability (aka math).
The fact that all modern higher knowledge has its roots in philosophy is irrelevant to the practice of science today.
The actual issue here is that you have learned the scientific method, but you don’t understand the philosophy behind it. This leads people to fetishize particular methods (quantification, experiments) and erroneously reject potentially effective methods. Not all science is based on probability. Likewise, not all knowledge is grounded in science.
Ask yourself how you get through day-to-day life without quantifying everything if math-based science is the only way to generate knowledge about the world. Ask how you know anything about Joe Rogan or his show if you haven’t administered him and his guests a battery of validated psychological tests or quantified their interactions. Your entire worldview and the scientific enterprise itself are based primarily on liberalism. That system is under threat today because people no longer understand what it is and why we adopted it in the first place. My point is, once again, that science is part of a much larger knowledge-producing system grounded in liberal principles.
Your arguments make no sense. Science is self sufficient and scientists don’t care what broader philosophical framework you think encapsulates science.
Statistically, the state of dating today is that more and more straight women would rather be single than be in a relationship with an unsuitable man.
So it is indeed likely that they ‘rule out that many men.’
If you're a woman who refuses to date men then you're by definition either 1) lesbian or 2) female incel/femcel. But I think the latter is an unnecessary insult and I try not to be insulting.
Statistically, the state of dating today is that more and more straight women would rather be single than be in a relationship with an unsuitable man.
So it is indeed likely that they ‘rule out that many men.’
If you're a woman who refuses to date men then you're by definition either 1) lesbian or 2) female incel/femcel. But I think the latter is an unnecessary insult and I try not to be insulting.
This is wild. Implying that women exercising their autonomy by choosing not to date you and you're brain rotten friends are all incels and lesbians is insane.
Lesbians are only attracted to women (duh) Incels by definiton are involunetary celibate.
What you're describing is just a single woman exercising her autonomy. I know that's super scary for you coddled, immature brain, brain-dead chuds. Grow up and join the rest of us in the real world, you tiny, ineffectual man.
Joe Rogan is an idiot. I wouldnt wanna date someone who values the opinion of idiots either.
If you're a woman who refuses to date men then you're by definition either 1) lesbian or 2) female incel/femcel. But I think the latter is an unnecessary insult and I try not to be insulting.
This is wild. Implying that women exercising their autonomy by choosing not to date you and you're brain rotten friends are all incels and lesbians is insane.
Lesbians are only attracted to women (duh) Incels by definiton are involunetary celibate.
What you're describing is just a single woman exercising her autonomy. I know that's super scary for you coddled, immature brain, brain-dead chuds. Grow up and join the rest of us in the real world, you tiny, ineffectual man.
Joe Rogan is an idiot. I wouldnt wanna date someone who values the opinion of idiots either.
What you call "incels" are just "single people exercising their autonomy." Whether men or women, they are just people who have set standards for romantic partners that none of their options have met. Nothing wrong with that imo, it's a distinction without a difference.
He is not very funny, or insightful. He reminds me of Rush Limbaugh. But I get listening to him for the echo chamber effect.... If you sort of think that way and he says it, then you are validated. No harm done, just another entertainer.
He is not very funny, or insightful. He reminds me of Rush Limbaugh. But I get listening to him for the echo chamber effect.... If you sort of think that way and he says it, then you are validated. No harm done, just another entertainer.
The fact that you think Joe Rogan and Rush Limbaugh are in any way similar proves you're just a partisan who's lashing out because you know Rogan isn't in your cult.
In someways Joe Rogan is dumb and he often adopts the opinions of well educated guests. He can start a podcast with one strong opinion, and by the end of the podcast he’s had his mind changed. So his original strong opinion isn’t really based on anything… and maybe not his new strong opinion either.
However, Joe Rogan is willing to have any guest with any ideology on his show. And he does not try to control the conversation or direct conversation in a particular way. He’s open to having a conversation about anything and really tries to understand the other person’s point of you. Most people who hate Rogan would never do this. Ironically, this makes Joe Rogan more enlightened than his haters.
For my taste, he has way too many meat heads and unfunny comics on his show. Plus, who’s going to sit there and watch something for three hours?
I have to give credit to Joe Rogan for inviting ultra runners including Courtney Dawaulter, Zach Bitter, and the wannabe ultra runner David Goggins. Definitely a fair call for a chick to not want to date an ultra runner or even a guy who likes ultras.
I recently saw an article that said if a man says on a date he listens to Joe Rogan, the woman sees it as a red flag. ??? Why would this be bad?
The funniest part is that if you’re an adult and need to ask that question in seriousness, you’re obviously deep into the pompous pseudo-intellectual world that women (or anyone with critical reading skills) view as a red flag.
maybe don’t mention Andrew Tate or Tucker Carlson on that first date either.
to me he's fear factor junk food. he allows a wide variety of people on his show including platforming a lot of right wing stuff and junk science. in that weird way it is promoting of broad free speech. but to me the people he's platforming are junk food who make the world worse. it's an emerging version of libertarianism that's rude, crude, and socially unacceptable. the marriageability problems associated with being a crude conservative boor should be fairly obvious. you don't match up with liberated liberal women. you don't match up with churchgoing type straight laced conservative women. i don't think there are a ton of crude tomboy type conservative women to be had, and meanwhile the men who have gone down this rogan/ peterson road see it as their true authentic self. everyone i know like this who has a relationship rides a rollercoaster as they tend to lack or not believe in social restraint.
i respect the supposed sincerity of it all but when you're like"why don't women like me/like my media" it's absurd.
to me he's fear factor junk food. he allows a wide variety of people on his show including platforming a lot of right wing stuff and junk science. in that weird way it is promoting of broad free speech. but to me the people he's platforming are junk food who make the world worse. it's an emerging version of libertarianism that's rude, crude, and socially unacceptable. the marriageability problems associated with being a crude conservative boor should be fairly obvious. you don't match up with liberated liberal women. you don't match up with churchgoing type straight laced conservative women. i don't think there are a ton of crude tomboy type conservative women to be had, and meanwhile the men who have gone down this rogan/ peterson road see it as their true authentic self. everyone i know like this who has a relationship rides a rollercoaster as they tend to lack or not believe in social restraint.
i respect the supposed sincerity of it all but when you're like"why don't women like me/like my media" it's absurd.
>>platforming a lot of right wing stuff<<
So, since it appears you have a vast knowledge of Rogan's guests, you should be able to say with pretty good accuracy off the top of your head what percentage of guests are "platforming a lot of right wing stuff". So what is that percentage?
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.