Shelby's side of the story from wapo

Well-known phenomenon wrote:

It’s a well-known phenomenon that people will think a news source to be knowledgeable a trustworthy. However, when the news source does a piece on a topic that a person knows well, the person will think the news source really bungled that one because they got it all wrong! However, the person will assume that this was an extremely rare and coincidental anomaly, and that the news source is practically always right. The reality is that the news source gets it wrong almost all the time!

This instance with Shelby and the degree that they got it right is emblematic of virtually all the WaPo stories. I’m shocked that anyone would trust any of these news sources.

Diddyo wrote:

TheRealTaro wrote:

This is so revealing. And predictable.

Revealing because it shows that people like you lack the character even to provide her full quote (which makes it clear that she knows she didn't deliberately take a PED).

Predictable because this is how people like you always operate. Honesty is a foreign concept to you and your ilk.

The tragedy is that such dishonesty isn't even surprising anymore. After all, you're a product of your culture, one in which a notorious pathological liar and con man has been elected to the country's highest office.

I am not going to reprint the entire article you imbecile.

twoggle wrote:

TestResultsAreSolid wrote:

The nandro was definitely from an artificial source. You can't fake isotope ratios. Draw your own conclusions.

Just wanted to point out that there are at least two studies showing isotope ratio results producing false positives with uncastrated pig pork ingestion — one small study with 40% false positive and one study showing 12.5% false positive (and high urine nandroline metabolite despite waiting 16 hours until the test was conducted). Smaller studies, but still much larger than some of the studies WADA relied on.

Diddyo wrote:

TheRealTaro wrote:

This is so revealing. And predictable.

Revealing because it shows that people like you lack the character even to provide her full quote (which makes it clear that she knows she didn't deliberately take a PED).

Predictable because this is how people like you always operate. Honesty is a foreign concept to you and your ilk.

The tragedy is that such dishonesty isn't even surprising anymore. After all, you're a product of your culture, one in which a notorious pathological liar and con man has been elected to the country's highest office.

I am not going to reprint the entire article you imbecile. Shelby admits guilt here.

Tommy2Nuttz wrote:

Diddyo wrote:

I am not going to reprint the entire article you imbecile. Shelby admits guilt here.

I read the entire article too and nowhere does she admit guilt In fact quite the opposite.

Remember that if she had admitted guilt she could have saved a yr. of suspension and she refused.

Diddyo wrote:

Tommy2Nuttz wrote:

I read the entire article too and nowhere does she admit guilt In fact quite the opposite.

Remember that if she had admitted guilt she could have saved a yr. of suspension and she refused.

You need to Eileen how to read. She admits she is dealing with feeling guilt and shame. This is not what happens to someone who has not committed wrongdoing.

solid test results wrote:

twoggle wrote:

Just wanted to point out that there are at least two studies showing isotope ratio results producing false positives with uncastrated pig pork ingestion — one small study with 40% false positive and one study showing 12.5% false positive (and high urine nandroline metabolite despite waiting 16 hours until the test was conducted). Smaller studies, but still much larger than some of the studies WADA relied on.

LOL. You know very well that the isotope ratio depends on the food. Those studies were about freely roaming pigs, not about farm-fed pig where the isotope ratio is predictable.

You left that out, rekrunner. Such dishonesty from you again, tsk tsk, Taro will get mad.

solid test results wrote:

twoggle wrote:

Just wanted to point out that there are at least two studies showing isotope ratio results producing false positives with uncastrated pig pork ingestion — one small study with 40% false positive and one study showing 12.5% false positive (and high urine nandroline metabolite despite waiting 16 hours until the test was conducted). Smaller studies, but still much larger than some of the studies WADA relied on.

LOL. You know very well that the isotope ratio depends on the food. Those studies were about freely roaming pigs, not about farm-fed pig where the isotope ratio is predictable.

You left that out, rekrunner. Such dishonesty from you again, tsk tsk, Taro will get mad.