Listen to this episode from The XC Report on Spotify. The Northwest Region is one of the most competitive and historically deep regions in High School XC. Today we're going to be taking a look at both the boys and girls teams...
RunningIdaho put out their 5A boys and girls predictions.
Boys: 1. CDA
2. Rocky 3. Boise
4. Eagle
5. Centennial
6. Mountain View
7. Highland
8. Thunder Ridge
9. Timberline
10. Capital
Girls:
1. Boise
2. Timberline 3. Highland
4. Rocky
5. Thunder Ridge
6. CDA 7. Mountain View
8. Owyhee
9. Meridian
10. Post Falls
Suprises? Mine are Centennial at 5 and Timberline at 9 on the boys, and Timberline over Highland and Rocky on the girls, as well as Mountain View being that low.
For the boys, says CDA should be one of the top 2, names Rocky as the next tier, says that they have a lot of depth but a lot of that depth is too far back to really help. Doesn't name Boise as a dark horse on the boys. Didn't get a chance to get to the girls.
For the boys, says CDA should be one of the top 2, names Rocky as the next tier, says that they have a lot of depth but a lot of that depth is too far back to really help. Doesn't name Boise as a dark horse on the boys. Didn't get a chance to get to the girls.
I've listened to the other podcasts and they seem to like depth more than most people do.
Don't necessarily blame them, but don't completely agree
For the boys, says CDA should be one of the top 2, names Rocky as the next tier, says that they have a lot of depth but a lot of that depth is too far back to really help. Doesn't name Boise as a dark horse on the boys. Didn't get a chance to get to the girls.
With Luke Athay back, depending on his fitness, Idaho Falls would be in that next tier too. They have a solid 1-4 without him
I ran the Steens 5k a few years back. It’s very uphill and isn’t a great indicator of anything other than who is a pretty good climber. Also, if you don’t get out fast you can get buried and the leaders can get way ahead of you early.
Rocky ran a time trial yesterday. A few of their boys posted about it although none of them posted an actual GPS readout which always makes me a little skeptical if the distance was actually right. I see that one boy ran 7:46 for 1.5. He has a 5:04 1600 PR and ran 11:00 in the 3200. Either he got a ton better or the course is probably a little short. It was also 103 out, so I’d be really shocked if someone had that big of a day. 7:46 in 103 is worth 7:30 or faster. I don’t think a guy is running faster than his 1600 PR by 6 seconds a mile on a cross country course once the heat is factored in. It will be interesting to see how they look at Bogus.