Cram, Ovett and Coe were absolutely all doped. The UK of thd late 70s and 80s had an organised doping programme in middle distance comparable to East Germany (where they likely got theur inspiration).
Some refer to the 90s as the EPO era of middle D but the 80s were way worse because of England, and EPO was already available.
You haven’t got a clue. Synthetic EPO was not around in the 1980’s. First used in cycling in early 90’s, then moved to T&F. UKA carried out random out of season testing from 85 and had in competition testing from early 80’s. Not a single shred of evidence that any of the Brit middle distance guys were on an organised doping program. If there was, then why was it limited to just MD and the men? Why weren’t UK women put on the same program to match the Soviet and GDR women?
I'll turn it round - why do you think she was clean?
It took respectively 27 yrs, 31 yrs and 29 yrs for a British woman to beat Cooks times at 100m, 200m, and 400m, and even now, well into the era of professional athletics, faster tracks and super shoes, only one British woman has even run faster than Cook's 200m best (Asher-Smith) and only one British woman has run faster than her 400m best (Ohuruogu) and only then, by just 2/100ths. Cooks 100m time still ranks 6th all-time on the UK lists!
She ran something like just one 400m in 82 and one in 83, then in 84, after a couple of mediocre 51.4's - 51.5's in June, she runs 49.43 in LA.
She may not have been on steroids, but she was on something
Good arguments! On the same token, the last one to match Coe's and Cruz's 1:41 was... Amos in 2019. 35 years of improvements including super shoes barely make up for the doping of the 1980s, evidently. Still waiting for the first Brit to match Coe's 1:41...
And we are still waiting for some NZ guy to better Snell’s 60 year old time over 2 laps! Surely by your reasoning that makes him the biggest doper of all time? Some people are more talented than others and someone has to be the best. Shoes have a disproportionate benefit the longer the event and that is why we see a lot more men having beaten 3:30 for 1500m than 1:42 for 800m. Athletics was also a much bigger sport in the UK and Europe (and the US) in the 70’s and 80’s than now, where a lot more talent goes into other sports.
None of those who raced him thought he doped. His talent was clearly not achieved through drugs. Jim Spivey even named his own kid Sebastian.
And how the hell did he get these drugs in Yorkshire when he was 20 as you claim? You are a moron.
None? Then you name only one man, J Spivey. What would J Spivey, a U.S. guy from Illinois know what P Coe placed in S Coe's body from mid-1970's going forward? Nineteen-eighty-one, S Coe set 800m world record for the second time. What was J Spivey doing in 1981? In 1981 J Spivey was concerned about Drake Relays, Big 10 T&F Championship and U. of Illinois sorority ladies. J Spivey would have had zero knowledge regarding actions of P Coe & S Coe. You need to stay focused. J Spivey competed against S Coe in 1500m races. S Coe's 1500m performances, years later do not puzzle us. Many of us are puzzled by S Coe's 400m & 800m development. How old were you poster, mid-1970's to early 1980's? You must not have know about some of the comments Steve Ovett made about S Coe, late 1970's & early 1980's. Paraphrase: They put him together in a lab ... .
A. Don't call people unflattering names simply because they disagree with you.
B. If you do not know, you can do like most let'srun readers, do not post.
Not very well read are you? Try ‘The Perfect Distance’ for a start, where there is plenty of comments from the likes of Wessinhage, Scott, Coghlan and Walker, stating that they did not believe either Coe or Ovett doped.
Secondly, you are totally misquoting what Ovett said re Coe, and he certainly never applied that Coe was in some way doping. He alluded to the fact that Coe did weights, plyometrics, a lot of gym work and was regularly tested for lactic threshold and VO2 max on a treadmill by scientists. He was very open and transparent about that at the time and is quite commonplace nowadays. Ovett never used that system, hence his dismissive comments. He is on record on several documentaries (easily found on YouTube), for stating that he believed Coe was “far more naturally gifted than I was.”
I most certainly am not wrong re those times given for a teenage Coe. The ones for 100, 200 and 400 (up to the 51.8) are totally made up. Again, I ask, show us the source ! Because I can tell you now, the only place you got those stats from can be found somewhere between Saturn and Neptune!
Aren't you over 70 years old? You are the biggest or second biggest S Coe find on this site. You should know how fast S Coe raced 400m when he was age 14, considering how much you praise the guy.
Those books by Peter Coe and David Martin PhD were not extremely popular. The books are difficult to obtain: Training for Distance Runners; Better Training for Distance Runners.
Read both books. It's in there in one of the books.
All pretty much sedentary. My PRs were basically close to his at every age. And I’m positive I trained both lower volume and with lower benefit than he did.
But yet, by the time I turned 20, I knew track wasn’t for me and for him, by 22, he was a world beater.
My guess is he started doping around 19-20.
Half of these times, especially for shorter events, have been made up. There is no record anywhere of what Coe was running over 100, 200 or 400m at those ages. The first listed time for 400m was 51.8 at 16. There is nothing below that before that. So unless you can offer some provenance for your 'splits', I'm calling your post BS!
I asked this too. Where does the 14 year old 400m time come from.
Half of these times, especially for shorter events, have been made up. There is no record anywhere of what Coe was running over 100, 200 or 400m at those ages. The first listed time for 400m was 51.8 at 16. There is nothing below that before that. So unless you can offer some provenance for your 'splits', I'm calling your post BS!
I asked this too. Where does the 14 year old 400m time come from.
Why are you pretending ignorance? I listed the books for you to read.
Clean. His gift was obviously that perfectly balanced running stride which was a genetic gift.
To those who stupidly think he doped, what age did he begin doping?
Eight-hundred meters is correlated more to 400m performance than 1500m performance. All 400m gold medalists, Olympics & W.C. since 1960 have been (44.xx to 47.xx) 400m guys or guys capable of (44.xx to 47.xx) 400m. Since 1960, some 800m gold medalists have been 3:42 plus 1500m men and some have been sub-3:32 1500m men. At age 14, S Coe was a 56.xx 400m guy (golf clap). A fine time. Faster 400m than most on here but, you know. By age 22, S Coe was a 46.xx 400m man. He was very thin in 1979 at age 22. That type of improvement does occur but usually not. When males go from 56.xx 400m to 46.xx 400m from age 14 to 22, they usually are strong men. S Coe reminds me of the women, 1976 & 1980 Olympics from then East Germany, then Soviet Union and satellite nations of then Soviet Union from 1976 & 1980. To directly answer your question: Sometime after age 13 but before age 22.
The really big change in Coe's speed came when he went to Loughborough University, and started doing weights and plyometrics under George Gandy. He had a tremendous vertical leap (oddly enough I believe he and Ovett were about equal on that score, Ovett naturally, given that he was an excellent schoolboy long-jumper).
This gives a flavor-
"Weight training, including barbell curls and bench pressing, was complemented by both circuit and stage training (circuits require exercises to be performed in rotation, stage training requires the same exercise’s reps and sets to be completed before moving onto a different exercise).
Plyometric work included box jumps which developed the remarkable power, balance and co-ordination which Coe would become famed for as the 1980s progressed.
In terms of focussing more on mobility and flexibility work during the competition phase of the macrocycle, Peter Coe’s approach to periodising these often overlooked components of fitness was pioneering. Much credit must also go to George Gandy in terms of his guidance while Seb was a student at Loughborough University."
In that respect, Coe and Ovett, both had explosive power (Coe through development, Ovett naturally) married to very high V02, which would enable them to performer very creditably beyond the distance that were their main focus (for example Coe beat Coghlan, McLeod and Spedding over 4 miles in a fast-time), and Ovett won the English Inter-Counties x-country (the the trials for the World x-country championship team at the time) over 7 1/2 miles.
All pretty much sedentary. My PRs were basically close to his at every age. And I’m positive I trained both lower volume and with lower benefit than he did.
But yet, by the time I turned 20, I knew track wasn’t for me and for him, by 22, he was a world beater.
My guess is he started doping around 19-20.
Half of these times, especially for shorter events, have been made up. There is no record anywhere of what Coe was running over 100, 200 or 400m at those ages. The first listed time for 400m was 51.8 at 16. There is nothing below that before that. So unless you can offer some provenance for your 'splits', I'm calling your post BS!
He had several area titles as a kid starting in 1971, and in 1973, when he'd have been 16-years-old, he beat the very good Ian Ray (eventually Commonwealth Games Marathon Medallist, and back then already a schools x-country champion) to win the English Schools 3000m Championship. Same year he won the AAA Youth (under 17) 1500m Championship. So, while you are saying he was a moderate talent at that age, he was essentially the best middle-distance runner of his age in the UK. He ran a 51.8 400m and 24.35 200m that year while a 1500/3000m runner.
The following year he ran a 36.2 300m. and won a Junior International 1500m match over the very good Abascal.
So, I don't think that at 20, he would have been thinking of quiting. In fact the following year he won the European indoor 800m and ran a British record 1:44.95 for 800m.
All pretty much sedentary. My PRs were basically close to his at every age. And I’m positive I trained both lower volume and with lower benefit than he did.
But yet, by the time I turned 20, I knew track wasn’t for me and for him, by 22, he was a world beater.
My guess is he started doping around 19-20.
Half of these times, especially for shorter events, have been made up. There is no record anywhere of what Coe was running over 100, 200 or 400m at those ages. The first listed time for 400m was 51.8 at 16. There is nothing below that before that. So unless you can offer some provenance for your 'splits', I'm calling your post BS!
An Analysis of Seb Coe’s Junior Performances and Race Selection Did Seb Coe avoid the pitfalls Australians encounter? Seb Coe, like Peter Snell, ran the 800m seriously for the first time at age 19.
Is there a shred of contemporaneous proof that Coe was a doper? Genuinely asking. Your feelings being hurt that Coe was faster than you isn't proof, btw.
Classic projection. Elite track is an entertainment business. It's on the business to prove the product is legit.
On a lighter note, it's a fact that Coe was less than 6 feet tall. Both Steve Ovett and Steve Cram were 6 feet tall. This is what make them ultimately superior to puny Coe. To be anybody you have to be at least 6 feet tall.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
Reason provided:
A well-trained rat can chew a hole through a meter of oak wood in less than one day.
Cram, Ovett and Coe were absolutely all doped. The UK of thd late 70s and 80s had an organised doping programme in middle distance comparable to East Germany (where they likely got theur inspiration).
Some refer to the 90s as the EPO era of middle D but the 80s were way worse because of England, and EPO was already available.
You haven’t got a clue. Synthetic EPO was not around in the 1980’s. First used in cycling in early 90’s, then moved to T&F. UKA carried out random out of season testing from 85 and had in competition testing from early 80’s. Not a single shred of evidence that any of the Brit middle distance guys were on an organised doping program. If there was, then why was it limited to just MD and the men? Why weren’t UK women put on the same program to match the Soviet and GDR women?
You are mostly wrong about the EPO history and its usage.
While it's true that synthetic EPO wasn't available until the late 80s, methods to extract and purify natural EPO from animals were designed in the 70s. EPO was actually available in the 80s as a doping agent.
In fact, the IOC added EPO to its list of banned substances in the year 1990. It's easy to understand why: it was USED in the 80s (and possibly even late 70s).
The absence of tests until the 2000s means that we will never know exactly who took EPO, unless they confess. But it was available as early as the late 70s, that is a fact, that can be easily verified.
Half of these times, especially for shorter events, have been made up. There is no record anywhere of what Coe was running over 100, 200 or 400m at those ages. The first listed time for 400m was 51.8 at 16. There is nothing below that before that. So unless you can offer some provenance for your 'splits', I'm calling your post BS!
He had several area titles as a kid starting in 1971, and in 1973, when he'd have been 16-years-old, he beat the very good Ian Ray (eventually Commonwealth Games Marathon Medallist, and back then already a schools x-country champion) to win the English Schools 3000m Championship. Same year he won the AAA Youth (under 17) 1500m Championship. So, while you are saying he was a moderate talent at that age, he was essentially the best middle-distance runner of his age in the UK. He ran a 51.8 400m and 24.35 200m that year while a 1500/3000m runner.
The following year he ran a 36.2 300m. and won a Junior International 1500m match over the very good Abascal.
So, I don't think that at 20, he would have been thinking of quiting. In fact the following year he won the European indoor 800m and ran a British record 1:44.95 for 800m.
I agree with everything you've written and it's great to see someone whose well read on the topic. I don't think I've ever insinuated he was a 'moderate talent' as a boy, he just took longer to fully develop into a man compared to Ovett.
I found this in his most recent biography from 2012 - ' Like every other junior school, Bridgetown Primary (Stratford, where he lived before moving to Sheffield) had its sports day, .... and that afternoon I won every race I went in for.
My victories led to me being entered for the next level up: Stratford primary schools, where I won both the long jump and 60 yards dash. A week or so later it was the turn of the South Warwickshire primary schools, and I can still remember running in Solihull and getting third place in the 60 yards. At 11 years old (N.B. before joining a club or any training), I was the quickest in the school, quickest in the town, and in the top three of a large proportion of a largish county.'
Half of these times, especially for shorter events, have been made up. There is no record anywhere of what Coe was running over 100, 200 or 400m at those ages. The first listed time for 400m was 51.8 at 16. There is nothing below that before that. So unless you can offer some provenance for your 'splits', I'm calling your post BS!
The only BS was that some of the times I posted were slightly faster than his actual PRs.
He went from a 51 400m to a 1:44 800m in 2 years as a post pubescent young adult.
And just as I stated earlier, NONE of those times for 400m or below are listed on your link for Coe at 12, 13, 14 or 15! The link only reitterates how few 400m he ran, which explains why he made a big improvement in his pb at that distance.
He didn't go from a 51 400m runner to a 1:44 800m runner in 2 years either! Totally inaccurate.
He ran 51.8 in 1973, when 16. He didn't break 1:45 (1:44.95 to be precise, which is more like a 1:45 runner) until 1977, EXACTLY 4 YEARS LATER. Coe was built like a boy at 16 and grew several inches in the 4 years that followed.
In the 4 years in between he didn't run another competitive 400m until 24.8.77, when he ran a 49.1, quickly followed by a 48.9 3 days later, (except for a 50.5 relay in 75 (aged 18) and a 36.2 300m, which is equivalent to a 50.5 for 400m).
This is totally in keeping with other athletes. Cram ran a PB of 49.1 for 400m in 1982 (aged 21) and his best 800m that year was 1:44.45.
Half of these times, especially for shorter events, have been made up. There is no record anywhere of what Coe was running over 100, 200 or 400m at those ages. The first listed time for 400m was 51.8 at 16. There is nothing below that before that. So unless you can offer some provenance for your 'splits', I'm calling your post BS!
You haven’t got a clue. Synthetic EPO was not around in the 1980’s. First used in cycling in early 90’s, then moved to T&F. UKA carried out random out of season testing from 85 and had in competition testing from early 80’s. Not a single shred of evidence that any of the Brit middle distance guys were on an organised doping program. If there was, then why was it limited to just MD and the men? Why weren’t UK women put on the same program to match the Soviet and GDR women?
You are mostly wrong about the EPO history and its usage.
While it's true that synthetic EPO wasn't available until the late 80s, methods to extract and purify natural EPO from animals were designed in the 70s. EPO was actually available in the 80s as a doping agent.
In fact, the IOC added EPO to its list of banned substances in the year 1990. It's easy to understand why: it was USED in the 80s (and possibly even late 70s).
The absence of tests until the 2000s means that we will never know exactly who took EPO, unless they confess. But it was available as early as the late 70s, that is a fact, that can be easily verified.
No, you are spouting nonsense. They only cloned the gene in 1983 and established that recombinant human erythropoietin can correct the anemia of chronic renal disease in 1986. It was only FDA approved for medical use in 1989.
The idea that athletes would randomly experiment with injecting bodily fluids or substances from animals before the medical community knew what it could do for renal conditions is ludicrous. No one was using EPO before 1987, when it was first available to doctors in Europe. The first known case of it used in sport was in the early 90's in cycling; despite the deaths of several elite cyclists between 1987 and 1990, these were never proved to be down to EPO.
So if the very earliest that it was used in cycling was 1987, the firts year it was available medically, it was certainly not around in 1981 when Coe was breaking world records.
Where does it state that EPO was used by sportsmen in the 70's or early 80's as a doping agent as you claim? Please give a link.
The only BS was that some of the times I posted were slightly faster than his actual PRs.
He went from a 51 400m to a 1:44 800m in 2 years as a post pubescent young adult.
And just as I stated earlier, NONE of those times for 400m or below are listed on your link for Coe at 12, 13, 14 or 15! The link only reitterates how few 400m he ran, which explains why he made a big improvement in his pb at that distance.
He didn't go from a 51 400m runner to a 1:44 800m runner in 2 years either! Totally inaccurate.
He ran 51.8 in 1973, when 16. He didn't break 1:45 (1:44.95 to be precise, which is more like a 1:45 runner) until 1977, EXACTLY 4 YEARS LATER. Coe was built like a boy at 16 and grew several inches in the 4 years that followed.
In the 4 years in between he didn't run another competitive 400m until 24.8.77, when he ran a 49.1, quickly followed by a 48.9 3 days later, (except for a 50.5 relay in 75 (aged 18) and a 36.2 300m, which is equivalent to a 50.5 for 400m).
This is totally in keeping with other athletes. Cram ran a PB of 49.1 for 400m in 1982 (aged 21) and his best 800m that year was 1:44.45.
Oh. But did he go from 51 to 1:44 in 2 years. That fact that he improved marginally from age 16 to age 18 doesn’t negate the fact that 1) his official PR was 51.8, 2) he ran a fairly paltry 36.2 which converted to 50.5 and 3) he ran a relay in 50.5 which his dad says was worth about 51.2 open.
However you slice it, he was roughly a 51 400m runner.
Didn't know much about UK athletics in the 80s but I'm learning a lot on this thread.
To summarize what you all discussed and agreed on:
- Sebastian Coe was an average runner until 1977-1978
- EPO became available in British research labs and Coe, as well as the rest of the UK team, had spectacular progress in the 80s, beating East germans.
- The UK participated in the 1980 olympics, which the US boycotted, where no testing of any kind was done. They won plenty medals in middle D, beating East germans.
- UK Athletics covered up the doping domestically (as they did in the 2012 olympics) and struck a deal with the US: you get the sprints, we get middle D.
- In the 1984 LA games, the US covered up positive tests results from their own team and the UK's.
- Post 1990, EPO became available world wide, and the UK no longer had an advantage. They lost their dominance.
Didn't know much about UK athletics in the 80s but I'm learning a lot on this thread.
To summarize what you all discussed and agreed on:
- Sebastian Coe was an average runner until 1977-1978
- EPO became available in British research labs and Coe, as well as the rest of the UK team, had spectacular progress in the 80s, beating East germans.
- The UK participated in the 1980 olympics, which the US boycotted, where no testing of any kind was done. They won plenty medals in middle D, beating East germans.
- UK Athletics covered up the doping domestically (as they did in the 2012 olympics) and struck a deal with the US: you get the sprints, we get middle D.
- In the 1984 LA games, the US covered up positive tests results from their own team and the UK's.
- Post 1990, EPO became available world wide, and the UK no longer had an advantage. They lost their dominance.
We have to acknowledge the extraordinary success of the Brits in athletics from 1975 to 1990. From 800m to marathon steeplechase and cross-country. I'd love to compile a list.