It looks like the same seriously stupid and childish response you gave to the skier.
But if you aren't an elite runner you aren't qualified to comment - so he says. I understand that you are a bit upset though, because you showed in that thread you had no idea what you were talking about when said collapse is not evidence of fatigue, and yet you also claim to know athletes are exhausted without any evidence for their said exhaustion.
Again -- you did the same seriously stupid and childish thing.
It's amusing how often you obliviously play the pot calling the kettle black.
But if you aren't an elite runner you aren't qualified to comment - so he says. I understand that you are a bit upset though, because you showed in that thread you had no idea what you were talking about when said collapse is not evidence of fatigue, and yet you also claim to know athletes are exhausted without any evidence for their said exhaustion.
Again -- you did the same seriously stupid and childish thing.
It's amusing how often you obliviously play the pot calling the kettle black.
You still can't get around the fact that you put forward a contradictory argument. However amusing you find that.
Let's not rule you that maybe you are the remarkably dim and/or dishonest one and simply unable to judge. Everything I said verifiably happened -- there is video evidence.
You said runners don't get exhausted enough to collapse, while now you argue strongly for it.
The question was if you noticed runners collapsing -- something you said doesn't happen anymore for runners.
After you ducked the question two times, I have my answer now.
The goal-posts shift - as you always have to do. You claimed the runners collapsed after their "warm-up" of the first 1200. I pointed out the obvious - they didn't collapse then; those that did so did it after after the 300m sprint to the finish of the race. So you were wrong about that.
I previously said that runners collapsing at the end of a md or distance race is a rarity now. That view isn't changed by this race but is reinforced by it. We don't see it often. What it tends to demonstrate is that events where competitors go into sudden oxygen debt may be more likely to see athletes collapse at the finish or otherwise show signs of extreme fatigue. It is still far less observable in top md and distance running than it used to be.
The goal post in the beginning "Did you notice two of the finishers collapsed to the ground ...".
I did said "after" and indeed it was "after". Note that that goal post says "finishers", so we are clearly talking about athletes that finished a 1500m race. Note that 1500m and the finish also comes *after* 1200m, according to the "transitive property".
Maybe it makes more sense for you to replace "after that warmup" with "despite that warmup". If I do that -- will you finally answer the original question, or will you find another less than subtle way to duck it again?
I don't care what your race is. But I do feel you should be in a zoo. Another peanut coming.
So tell me, what has been your contribution to this thread, apart from your following me around like a demented ape?
Given that you have admitted using racial terms your continued monkey taunts can only be interpreted as racism as they were originally and persistently given to people of colour .Your racism has moved beyond casual or uneducated racism to deliberate knowing racism.
This thread was about a fast 200m split in a 1500m race.
FWIW, I think that 23.63s, or whatever the exact split was, is impressive in a 1500m race, regardless of how fast the first 1200m was.
When you say "regardless of how fast the first 1200 was" you show you utterly miss the point about that level of achievement. What if the 1200 was 3.04 or even 2.54 and not 3.14? Or maybe 3.24? Makes no difference to you? Of course not. Everything is just stats to you - not real.
I don't care what your race is. But I do feel you should be in a zoo. Another peanut coming.
So tell me, what has been your contribution to this thread, apart from your following me around like a demented ape?
Given that you have admitted using racial terms your continued monkey taunts can only be interpreted as racism as they were originally and persistently given to people of colour .Your racism has moved beyond casual or uneducated racism to deliberate knowing racism.
So I ask you again, what have you contributed to the subject of the thread - any thread - other than following me around like a yapping puppy?
The goal-posts shift - as you always have to do. You claimed the runners collapsed after their "warm-up" of the first 1200. I pointed out the obvious - they didn't collapse then; those that did so did it after after the 300m sprint to the finish of the race. So you were wrong about that.
I previously said that runners collapsing at the end of a md or distance race is a rarity now. That view isn't changed by this race but is reinforced by it. We don't see it often. What it tends to demonstrate is that events where competitors go into sudden oxygen debt may be more likely to see athletes collapse at the finish or otherwise show signs of extreme fatigue. It is still far less observable in top md and distance running than it used to be.
The goal post in the beginning "Did you notice two of the finishers collapsed to the ground ...".
I did said "after" and indeed it was "after". Note that that goal post says "finishers", so we are clearly talking about athletes that finished a 1500m race. Note that 1500m and the finish also comes *after* 1200m, according to the "transitive property".
Maybe it makes more sense for you to replace "after that warmup" with "despite that warmup". If I do that -- will you finally answer the original question, or will you find another less than subtle way to duck it again?
What I did notice was that you have contradicted yourself without acknowledgement and made a claim without evidence. Your modus operandi. Then, curiously, you think that a couple of runners in an elite race were out of breath proves a general point about the demands of md running. I guess we need to see if it becomes the norm again across the board.
I don't care what your race is. But I do feel you should be in a zoo. Another peanut coming.
So tell me, what has been your contribution to this thread, apart from your following me around like a demented ape?
Given that you have admitted using racial terms your continued monkey taunts can only be interpreted as racism as they were originally and persistently given to people of colour .Your racism has moved beyond casual or uneducated racism to deliberate knowing racism.
What I do know is that your obsession with me is without limits.
Given that you have admitted using racial terms your continued monkey taunts can only be interpreted as racism as they were originally and persistently given to people of colour .Your racism has moved beyond casual or uneducated racism to deliberate knowing racism.
What I do know is that your obsession with me is without limits.
The goal post in the beginning "Did you notice two of the finishers collapsed to the ground ...".
I did said "after" and indeed it was "after". Note that that goal post says "finishers", so we are clearly talking about athletes that finished a 1500m race. Note that 1500m and the finish also comes *after* 1200m, according to the "transitive property".
Maybe it makes more sense for you to replace "after that warmup" with "despite that warmup". If I do that -- will you finally answer the original question, or will you find another less than subtle way to duck it again?
What I did notice was that you have contradicted yourself without acknowledgement and made a claim without evidence. Your modus operandi. Then, curiously, you think that a couple of runners in an elite race were out of breath proves a general point about the demands of md running. I guess we need to see if it becomes the norm again across the board.
“ evidence “ say Armstronglivs.
The man who denies the evidence in medical text books; the principles of scientific research and every peer reviewed reference presented.
This thread was about a fast 200m split in a 1500m race.
FWIW, I think that 23.63s, or whatever the exact split was, is impressive in a 1500m race, regardless of how fast the first 1200m was.
When you say "regardless of how fast the first 1200 was" you show you utterly miss the point about that level of achievement. What if the 1200 was 3.04 or even 2.54 and not 3.14? Or maybe 3.24? Makes no difference to you? Of course not. Everything is just stats to you - not real.
Apparently a 3:34-3:35 runner produced the fastest 200m split ever in a 1500m.
That is impressive in and of itself, whether the first 1200 was 2:54 or 3:24 or 2:24 or 3:54.
When you say "regardless of how fast the first 1200 was" you show you utterly miss the point about that level of achievement. What if the 1200 was 3.04 or even 2.54 and not 3.14? Or maybe 3.24? Makes no difference to you? Of course not. Everything is just stats to you - not real.
Apparently a 3:34-3:35 runner produced the fastest 200m split ever in a 1500m.
That is impressive in and of itself, whether the first 1200 was 2:54 or 3:24 or 2:24 or 3:54.
So it is just as impressive if it came off 3.54 than if it was off 2.54? I guess it depends on whether you think a 1500 is a race over the full distance and not just the last 200. Let's see if he is better than 3.34-35.
What I did notice was that you have contradicted yourself without acknowledgement and made a claim without evidence. Your modus operandi. Then, curiously, you think that a couple of runners in an elite race were out of breath proves a general point about the demands of md running. I guess we need to see if it becomes the norm again across the board.
“ evidence “ say Armstronglivs.
The man who denies the evidence in medical text books; the principles of scientific research and every peer reviewed reference presented.
Given that you have admitted using racial terms your continued monkey taunts can only be interpreted as racism as they were originally and persistently given to people of colour .Your racism has moved beyond casual or uneducated racism to deliberate knowing racism.
So I ask you again, what have you contributed to the subject of the thread - any thread - other than following me around like a yapping puppy?
Silence. He has nothing to offer on the subject of thread and indeed wouldn't know what it is.