Salvitore Stitchmo wrote:
fact czech wrote:
Something like 5/50 posters said that Brazier would run sub 1:42 at that meet. GTFOH.
Cool, and another 30 said 1.42 and change with the American record definitely under threat. Since you are a fact checker why don't you go count and report back sl@pnuts?
Because that wasn't your original claim. which was way the f*ck off.
Wow. WR. Great result. Great runner.
It might be an all time great Letsrun prediction.
Too bad it wasn’t with a registered name.
Salvitore Stitchmo wrote:
Jambo Cabao wrote:
And as for the original question, I'd be shocked to see a sub 12:50.
I'm guessing a 12:55 winning time. Two other sub 13:00. And a bunch of 13:08-13:12s.
You are right on. This thread reminds me of the "Donovan Brazier is a lock to run sub 1.42 on a high school track in front of 30 people in a time trial" sentiment expressed on another thread a few weeks ago, thus legitimately showing how at least 3/4 of posters here truly know f%$k-all about track and field at this level.
But I like this prediction, I'm with you.
Looks like you are the one who knows f$#k-all about track and field at this level.