The results of my Physical Examination, taken at Walter Reed Military Medical Center, and just released, were extremely good. Unlike other U.S. Presidents, none of whom have ever taken an approved, high difficulty, Cognitive Test, I scored a perfect 30 out of 30, considered “extreme intelligence.” Are the Dumocrats really surprised? In fact, this is my fourth such test, all PERFECT or, 120 correct answers out of 120 questions asked! It is very rare that anyone gets a Perfect Score, especially when achieved four times in a row. All people running for President and Vice President should be forced to take high difficulty Cognitive Tests. Congress, and the Dumocrats, should demand it!
the rocket scientist was able to pick a cow out of three pictures, one a snake, one a cat, one a cow, good job. He also was able to draw a circle and put the clock hands at 3:00, keep up the good work!
If any of us had predicted that Trump would demolish a third of the White House and build a UFC ring on the South Lawn, we would have been dismissed as the most unhinged conspiracy theorists to ever exist
the rocket scientist was able to pick a cow out of three pictures, one a snake, one a cat, one a cow, good job. He also was able to draw a circle and put the clock hands at 3:00, keep up the good work!
According to the doctor that administered the test, it took Trump four tries to pick the cow out of three pictures.
If any of us had predicted that Trump would demolish a third of the White House and build a UFC ring on the South Lawn, we would have been dismissed as the most unhinged conspiracy theorists to ever exist
Go back 15 years and you’d be dismissed as insane for saying that 99% of House Dems would vote to allow men in women’s sports. California gives the actual female athletes a gold to make up for losing to a male - acknowledging that it’s unfair - but has defied Trump’s executive order.
Transgender athlete AB Hernandez competed for a state title Saturday as angry parents and activists rallied outside the CIF State Track & Field Championships, demanding female events be reserve…
If any of us had predicted that Trump would demolish a third of the White House and build a UFC ring on the South Lawn, we would have been dismissed as the most unhinged conspiracy theorists to ever exist
Go back 15 years and you’d be dismissed as insane for saying that 99% of House Dems would vote to allow men in women’s sports. California gives the actual female athletes a gold to make up for losing to a male - acknowledging that it’s unfair - but has defied Trump’s executive order.
Did the Founders really not envision a situation where a majority of Congress goes along with having a king?
Did anyone really think that it was safe to have the Department of Justice under the control of a president?
Am I missing something, or are there no penalties whatsoever when a president and members of his administration blatantly violate the Constitution? And often or always, daily.
For those who say Trump will never do anything Israel doesn’t want:
Daily Mail: PM Benjamin Netanyahu is reportedly raging in private as Trump moves closer to a deal with Iran.
According to Al-Monitor, Netanyahu views the potential agreement as a disaster and blames Trump for it. The report says he’s so frustrated that he’s now longing for the days when Obama was in the White House.
“This time, the prime minister’s hands are tied. He is completely paralyzed and knows that he will not be able to do anything, even if the agreement signed between the United States and Iran remains the disaster he now defines it as”, one of Netanyahu’s close associates told the outlet.
Reminder: Federal agents executed one or two American citizens months ago in Minneapolis. To my knowledge, no federal investigations of either incident. And refusal to assist non-federal investigations.
Remember that when you’re celebrating 250 years this summer.
Did the Founders really not envision a situation where a majority of Congress goes along with having a king?
Did anyone really think that it was safe to have the Department of Justice under the control of a president?
Am I missing something, or are there no penalties whatsoever when a president and members of his administration blatantly violate the Constitution? And often or always, daily.
Rhetorical questions, but they did think that with the independent and coequal branches of government a new king could be avoided.
The sad fact is that the Constitution is just a piece of paper unless you have people of moral character and integrity to uphold it.
So here we are with the current GOP, though decades in the making.
If any of us had predicted that Trump would demolish a third of the White House and build a UFC ring on the South Lawn, we would have been dismissed as the most unhinged conspiracy theorists to ever exist
Go back 15 years and you’d be dismissed as insane for saying that 99% of House Dems would vote to allow men in women’s sports. California gives the actual female athletes a gold to make up for losing to a male - acknowledging that it’s unfair - but has defied Trump’s executive order.
^This is CLEARLY the most important issue facing the nation right now!!! 10s of billions being spent on a totally strategic blunder in Iran? GDP below 2% (Q1 just revised down….surprise, surprise)? Inflation highest in 3 years and approaching 4%? National debt racing toward 40 trillion and accelerating (what exactly did DOGE accomplish?)? American citizens being executed in the streets of Minneapolis for exercising their 1st and 2nd rights? What ever happened to the Epstein files that Trump promised to release during his campaign?
But, but, but….LOOK A TRANSGENDER SQUIRREL!!!!!!!! Now I am paying attention! We must protect women’s sports which I also constantly mock as being boring, say no one watches those sports, argue the players shouldn’t make as much money as men, etc. etc.
Did the Founders really not envision a situation where a majority of Congress goes along with having a king?
Did anyone really think that it was safe to have the Department of Justice under the control of a president?
Am I missing something, or are there no penalties whatsoever when a president and members of his administration blatantly violate the Constitution? And often or always, daily.
One of the Constitution’s major flaws is that it does not adequately control an outlaw president. And we are bleeding from that oversight.
putting doj under the control of the president is a good example of the flaw.
If any of us had predicted that Trump would demolish a third of the White House and build a UFC ring on the South Lawn, we would have been dismissed as the most unhinged conspiracy theorists to ever exist
Trump has also taken of the park behind the White House. Something is built under it. There is a yuge amount of dirt being removed from underground that made no sense. This is not the first time underground work has gone on at the White House. The method of pretending nothing is going on is different this time.
Reminder: Federal agents executed one or two American citizens months ago in Minneapolis. To my knowledge, no federal investigations of either incident. And refusal to assist non-federal investigations.
Remember that when you’re celebrating 250 years this summer.
It’s been almost 5 months since Renee good tried to run over an ICE agent. She won’t do that again.
Did the Founders really not envision a situation where a majority of Congress goes along with having a king?
Did anyone really think that it was safe to have the Department of Justice under the control of a president?
Am I missing something, or are there no penalties whatsoever when a president and members of his administration blatantly violate the Constitution? And often or always, daily.
The MAGA plan is obvious. They can't win elections because their "policies" are anchored in the 1950s. Political parties which fail to adapt die off. Rather than adapt, the MAGA goal is to take over so that only "politicians" they get chose (white, rightwing, religious) tell everyone they don't like how they will live their lives.
The party of "over my dead body" is now the party of "over your dead body" ... "you can't tell me what to do" but "you must do as I say."
Did the Founders really not envision a situation where a majority of Congress goes along with having a king?
Did anyone really think that it was safe to have the Department of Justice under the control of a president?
Am I missing something, or are there no penalties whatsoever when a president and members of his administration blatantly violate the Constitution? And often or always, daily.
Rhetorical questions, but they did think that with the independent and coequal branches of government a new king could be avoided.
The sad fact is that the Constitution is just a piece of paper unless you have people of moral character and integrity to uphold it.
So here we are with the current GOP, though decades in the making.
Well, they’re not REALLY rhetorical questions. They’re actual questions. With answers, I’m imagining, ranging from somewhere between a simple “No,” to, “Yes, this was discussed and debated a lot, but we ended up with that solution because, ________.”
